John Bajkowski
John Bajkowski is president of AAII.
Areas of Expertise: stock screening, dividend investing, model portfolios, Stock Superstars Report
Topics Presented in Speeches: “Finding a Stock Winner: First Step Screening” and “AAII Shadow Stock Portfolio: From Theory to Application”
Biography:
John Bajkowski is president of AAII. As financial analyst for AAII, John writes a column on screening stocks. He also serves on the Dividend Investing and Stock Superstars advisory committees. He earned a bachelor’s degree in finance and management from DePaul University. He has been with AAII for over 25 years.
Articles by this Author
-
Stock Screens »
Implementing a High-Yield Screen to Invest in Stocks With DRPs
Many individuals are attracted to companies with DRPs as a low-cost way to buy shares. But limiting investment to only DRPs tends to exclude certain sectors from your portfolio, including higher-growth stocks. June 2003 | Journal
-
Stock Screens »
The Muhlenkamp Stock Screen: High ROEs at a Reasonable Price
Muhlenkamp uses a bottom-up approach to selecting stocks, but adjusts his benchmarks based upon the broad economic environment, using prevailing inflation and interest rates to help establish his investment hurdles. May 2003 | Journal
-
Computerized-investing »
Portfolio Management Software Programs
An in-depth look at seven disk-based portfolio managers that are best suited for individual investors. May 2003 | Computerized-investing
-
Computerized-investing »
Comparison: Portfolio Management Software Programs
An in-depth look at seven disk-based portfolio managers that are best suited for individual investors. May 2003 | Computerized-investing
-
Computerized-investing »
Thoughts on asset allocation and computer tools that help track and analyze your portfolio. May 2003 | Computerized-investing
-
Stock Screens »
How to Use the CAN SLIM Approach to Screen for Growth Stocks
AAII's interpretation of the CAN SLIM approach has been one of the most consistent and strongest-performing screens during both bull and bear markets. An update on the CAN SLIM strategy. April 2003 | Journal
-
Computerized-investing »
The CAN SLIM Approach: Revising a Screen
A step-by-step guide to building a screen using William O’Neil’s recently updated approach. Three stock screeners are used to compare the practicalities of implementing screen criteria. March 2003 | Computerized-investing
-
Computerized-investing »
Thoughts on re-examining the CANSLIM approach. March 2003 | Computerized-investing
-
Stock Screens »
Stock Strategy Performance: Winners and Losers in 2002
The Graham Enterprising Investor screen led the pack in 2002 in total gains. This value approach looks for dividend-paying stocks with low price-earnings ratios. January 2003 | Journal
-
Computerized-investing »
Comments on personal finance programs. January 2003 | Computerized-investing
-
Computerized-investing »
Feature: Building a Computer for Investing
Our annual look at the hardware you'll need for most typical computer investing tasks and how much you can expect to pay. November 2002 | Computerized-investing
-
Stock Screens »
Dividends Count: Screening for Undervalued Stocks With Lower Risk
If a stock's price rises faster than its dividend, the dividend yield will fall, indicating the price may have been bid up too far. Conversely, if the yield rises to a high level, the stock may be poised for an increase. October 2002 | Journal
-
Stock Screens »
Building a Screen for Reasonably Priced ADRs
Performance of an ADR will closely monitor that of the underlying stock traded on a foreign exchange. And for U.S.-based investors, ADRs are subject to the same currency risk as the underlying stock. September 2002 | Journal
-
Computerized-investing »
A look at how four Web sites with interactive calculators help you to check the progress of your retirement goals. September 2002 | Computerized-investing
-
Fundamentals »
EBT, EBIT, EBITDA: Will the Real Earnings Figure Please Stand Up?
All of the various earnings measures have their value, especially when applied consistently across a given industry. But they must still be examined in the context of all three corporate financial statements. August 2002 | Journal
