Editor's Outlook: Microsoft's Dirty Vista Secret
by Wayne A. Thorp
What was undoubtedly a major headache for Microsoft made for some interesting reading for the rest of us. As part of a class-action lawsuit against Microsoft, E-mails between company executives surfaced at the end of January regarding problems with bringing the Vista operating system to market.
The E-mails provide a revealing look into Microsofts relationships with other corporate heavyweights, including Intel, HP, Dell, and even Wal-Mart. They also serve to intensify the glare on Vistas less-than-smooth rollout.
In this article
Share this article
The lawsuit is related to Microsofts Windows Vista Capable logo program, launched in 2006, ahead of Vistas release in January 2007. It alleges that Microsofts Vista-capable marketing plan misled consumers.
Systems labeled as capable contained Intels 915 integrated chipset, which boosts a systems ability to display multimedia effects but lacks the necessary features to support Vistas 3-D Aero interface. Vista Premium ready systems used the more advanced 945 chipset. However, only a month before Vistas release, Microsoft Senior VP Steve Sinofsky warned CEO Steve Ballmer that even the 945 chipset could barely run Vista.
According to the E-mails, Microsoft certified these chipsets under pressure from Intel. In a February 2007 E-mail, Microsoft GM John Kalkman wrote In the end, we lowered the [Vista Capable] requirement to help Intel make their quarterly earnings . Another E-mail, from a senior director at Microsoft to the head of its Windows division reads, We are caving to Intel. We worked hard for the last 18 months to drive the UI [user interface] experience and we are giving this up.
By lowering the standards for what constituted Vista-capable, Microsoft also upset HP: We are really burning HPwho committed to work with us to drive the UI experience across platforms and have already made significant investments.
Even Wal-Mart voiced its concern over the Vista-capable label. A February 23 E-mail from a Microsoft consumer sales manager relates, They are extremely disappointed in the fact that the standards were lowered and feel like customer confusion will ensue. Interestingly, many industry experts believe that Microsoft lowered their Vista standards to capture a greater portion of the budget PC market, an arena in which Wal-Mart flourishes.
Finally, there is an E-mail from October 2005 from Padmanand Warriercurrently director of services for Windows Mobilethat provides an excellent summary: This does not make sense to me if I read this correctly, a customer could buy a Ready PC and think that is what he/she is getting. However, it will not even meet the requirements for running standard Vista thats just bad.
Even Microsoft executives were not immune, as Windows Product Management VP Mike Nash wrote, I personally got burned by the Intel 915 chipset issue on a laptop. I chose my laptop because it had the Vista logo and was pretty disappointed. I now have a $2,100 E-mail machine.
No matter where the blames lies, many consumers can tell you that systems labeled Vista-capable or Premium-ready did not deliver the experience they were expecting.