Though I don’t put much weight on forecasts and I invest for the long term, I do keep an eye on how attractive or risky the market appears to be. Partially, I do this because I work in the investment industry and am periodically asked what I think about the market. But I also do this because I think an awareness of the current market conditions can help with portfolio decisions.
None of this is about market timing. Market timing involves buying and selling securities based on what you think will happen. While I have spoken to some investors who say they avoided the last bear market, far more have told me that they have missed out on part or most of the current bull market out of fear about what they thought might happen. I don’t think investors, individual or institutional, should use market timing strategies, and the reason is simple: The future typically unfolds in ways we do not expect it to.
What paying attention to the market’s potential rewards and risks can do is assist you with your portfolio decisions. During periods of greater risk, it can make sense to ensure your portfolio does not have an excessive allocation to overvalued asset classes (relative to your long-term strategy), to tighten your sell rules, and to avoid riskier or more aggressive strategies and investments. During periods of greater potential reward, it can make sense to boost your allocations to the undervalued asset classes (again, relative to your long-term strategy), to be more willing to put up with short-term price volatility in exchange for long-term gains, and to act in a manner that may be contrary to how your emotions may want to you to act (e.g., buying stocks in February 2009). The goal is not to time the market or try to determine when to get in or out of certain asset classes (e.g., stocks), but rather to move within the boundaries of your long-term investment strategy. Even disciplined strategies can allow for some flexibility as long as you don’t violate the spirit or the key underlying premise of your approach.
With this background in mind, here are a few indicators I keep an eye on. This is not meant to be a comprehensive list, but rather some factors, in alphabetical order, you may find useful.
Economic Data: Broad changes in the economy can make conditions more favorable or more troublesome for various asset classes. The challenge is that the financial markets can move in anticipation of a change in the economic backdrop. Thus, though it is tempting to rely on economic data to make portfolio decisions, making correct calls based on the prevailing data is difficult. Evidence of this can be seen in the routinely incorrect forecasts about when the Federal Reserve will start raising interest rates.
One notable indicator may be housing starts. All six of the past market tops (starting in 1973) have coincided with a year-over-year decline in housing starts, according to Sam Stovall at S&P Capital IQ. Housing starts were increasing on a year-over-year basis during the 1961, 1966 and 1968 market tops, so the data cannot be viewed as a flawless indicator of an impending drop in stock prices.
Enthusiasm: One characteristic of a bubble is when expectations of good long-term returns are high and prevalent. Consider the tech bubble of the late 1990s and last decade’s housing bubble. I heard many people talk about rising prices and what great investments tech stocks and real estate were, respectively. Even more recently, the fringe currency bitcoin made many headlines before crashing in price. When enthusiasm is high, valuations often are as well. Conversely, when everybody seems worried about losing their shirt (as they were near the end of the last bear market), opportunities abound.
It’s difficult to fully measure enthusiasm. Our Sentiment Survey gives some insight, as do other similar surveys such as the Investors Intelligence U.S. Advisors’ Sentiment Report. I pay attention to the conversations I have with members, friends and investment professionals. What the media discusses is also helpful. Right now, I still don’t view the current bull market as having a high level of enthusiasm.
Seasonal Trends: Since World War II, stocks have performed better between November and April then they have between May and October. I use these seasonal shifts to see if rebalancing is needed, though the changes can be also used as a prompt to switch between being more aggressive and more conservative. I’m also eyeing how the market ends this month. While the S&P 500’s performance in January does not cause the full-year return for stocks to be up or down, the odds for a good year are higher when the large-cap index ends January with a gain.
Stock Screens: The more than 60 stock screens tracked on AAII.com collectively provide insight into prevailing market conditions. For instance, last year was tough for active managers, and the performance for many of our screens lagged. I can’t say that I’ve noticed a strong correlation between the number of passing stocks for certain screens and the market direction, but I do notice trends.
For example, it’s been tough to find good value stocks over the past several months. Due to the length of the current bull market, many stocks are trading at higher valuations, especially relative to the average valuation ratios that investors have been willing to pay over the past five years. Many stocks are simply no longer cheap. They’re not necessarily expensive, but they’re not cheap either.
Technical Analysis: I am not a chartist, but I do think charts are useful for determining whether momentum is favorable or unfavorable. A significant change in momentum can be a sign that something positive or negative has happened and would be reason to investigate further. From a big-picture view (and ignoring security-specific analysis), combining chart patterns with fundamental characteristics like valuations can be used as a prompt to become more aggressive or more conservative.
For example, the S&P 500 has experienced an up-and-down month and has tested the lows set in December. Even with the fluctuations, however, the index remains above its 200-day moving average, which is a positive. I view the current trend as remaining bullish overall with the recent up-and-down movement being more of a normal fluctuation than anything else. Charts are, of course, open to interpretation, and the opinions of others may differ.
Valuations: Valuations are a useful long-term investment tool. The sharp rise in technology stock prices in the late 1990s and the jump in housing prices last decade were both followed by significant drops. Valuations matter because the higher they are, the more room for disappointment there is. Put another way, valuations reflect the returns investors “expect” to get (high valuations = high expectations) and the returns they “should” anticipate realizing (high valuations = greater chance for disappointing returns).
Right now, large-cap stocks look neither cheap nor expensive. Thomson Reuters lists the trailing price-earnings ratio for the S&P 500 as being 16.9. Some argue that Robert Shiller’s cyclically adjusted price-earnings (CAPE) ratio of 26.7 implies that stocks are overvalued. In the new third edition of Shiller’s “Irrational Exuberance” (Princeton University Press, 2015), there is a chart showing that since 1986, the majority of January CAPE readings above 20 have been followed by market gains over the following 10 years. Three notable exceptions are CAPE readings above 35, which occurred in January 1999, January 2000 and January 2001.
Again, keep in mind that this is not meant to be a definitive list. It is merely some of the indicators I look at. More importantly, understand that none of these indicators will tell you with any certainty what Mr. Market will do next week, next month or next year. Trying to react to each anticipated market move not only increases your transaction costs, but also raises the risk of making the wrong decision at the wrong time, including the abandonment of a long-term allocation strategy out of fear of losing money over the short term. It’s not uncommon for the financial decisions that feel the most comfortable in the moment to end up causing long-term harm to your net worth.
- Charles Dow’s Theory Still Valid for the 21st Century – One of the oldest methods still used for analyzing the stock market is the Dow Theory, which tracks the movement of the Dow Jones industrials and transports.
- The Market Timing Approach: A Guide to the Various Strategies – Though I’m critical of market timing, I saw this 1994 AAII Journal article in our archives and thought some of you would be interested in reading it.
- What Market Indicators Do You Look At? – Tell us on the AAII.com Discussion Board.
About 100 S&P 500 member companies will report their quarterly (and annual) results as earnings season stays busy. Included in this group are Dow Jones industrial components Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) on Monday, Walt Disney Co. (DIS) on Tuesday and Merck & Co. (MRK) on Wednesday.
The week’s first economic reports will be December personal income and spending, the January ISM manufacturing index, the January PMI manufacturing index and December construction spending, all of which will be released on Monday. Tuesday will feature December factory orders. The January ADP Employment Report and the January ISM non-manufacturing index will be released on Wednesday. Thursday will feature December international trade data and fourth-quarter productivity data. The January jobs report, including the change in non-farm payrolls and the unemployment rate, will be released on Friday.
Several Federal Reserve officials are scheduled to make public appearances, as is typical following a Federal Open Market Committee meeting. St. Louis president James Bullard and Minneapolis president Narayana Kocherlakota will speak on Tuesday. Cleveland president Loretta Mester will speak on Wednesday. Boston president Eric Rosengren will speak on Thursday. Atlanta president Dennis Lockhart will speak on Friday.
- A Comprehensive Approach to Covered Call Writing
- What Exactly Do Online Investment Advisory Services Offer?
- How Much Is Needed to Start Investing?
Optimism about the short-term direction of stock prices among individual investors is back above its historical average, according to the latest AAII Sentiment Survey. Neutral sentiment rose as well, while pessimism dropped.
Bullish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will rise over the next six months, rose by 7.0 percentage points to 44.2%. The increase puts optimism above its historical average of 39.0% for the 22nd time in the past 25 weeks.
Neutral sentiment, expectations that stock prices will stay essentially unchanged over the next six months, rose 1.4 percentage points to 33.4%. This is the second-highest reading since early October. The historical average is 30.5%.
Bearish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will fall over the next six months, plunged 8.4 percentage points to 22.4%. The drop puts pessimism back near the lower the end of its typical range. Bearish sentiment has been below its historical average of 30.5% for 14 out of the past 15 weeks.
Neutral sentiment is now above its historical average for four consecutive weeks. This is the longest such streak since neutral sentiment stayed above average for 32 consecutive weeks between January 9 and August 14, 2014.
Keeping AAII members encouraged is the overall upward momentum of stock prices, falling energy prices, earnings growth and sustained economic expansion. Causing other members to be cautious or pessimistic are geopolitical events, the impact of falling oil prices on energy stocks, a sense that prevailing valuations for stocks are too high, the pace of economic growth and worries that a large decline in stock prices could occur.
This week’s special question asked AAII members what type of influence the direction of stock prices has on their six-month market outlook. More than a third (36%) said price movement does not or only minimally influences their short-term outlook. Several of these respondents described themselves as buy-and-hold investors. About 20% said other factors, including the economy and valuations, influence their outlooks. Nearly 18% said the direction of stock prices either significantly or partially influences their short-term outlook.
Here is a sampling of the responses:
- “Not very much. I’m more influenced by macro-economic factors.”
- “Not much. Buy good stocks and you’ll get good results.”
- “None. I’m a buy and hold investor.”
- “Significant. I believe prices are a relevant input.”
- “Some consideration, but not the only factor.”
Bullish: 44.2%, up 7.0 points
Neutral: 33.4%, up 1.4 points
Bearish: 22.4%, down 8.4 points
Local Chapter Meetings
January 22, 2015 Oil Shows the Folly of Forecasts
January 15, 2015 The Tools I Use for Managing My Finances
January 8, 2015 A Fourth Good Year for Stocks?
January 1, 2015 14 Investing Resolutions for the New Year