Close

Letters

Letters Splash image

ETFs and the Model Fund Portfolio

Comments posted to “Frontier Markets Exposure Added to the Model Fund Portfolio,” by James B. Cloonan, in the August 2013 AAII Journal:

Is there a pure ETF portfolio in which we could inve

—Diane Sracic from Florida

I have been researching exchange-traded funds. Vanguard has really low expense ratios and Morningstar seems to like a lot of them. What is the reason for not having any Vanguard ETFs, except the Vanguard REIT Index fund?

—Barbara Kristoff from California

James Cloonan responds:

We previously had separate model fund and ETF portfolios. But there are different areas where each is most effective, so we combined them into one model portfolio.

Exchange-traded funds are still primarily for index investing, and some approaches to the market cannot be indexed.

Gain exclusive access to all of AAII.com, PLUS our market-beating Model Stock Portfolio — currently trouncing the S&P 4-to-1!

TRY US FREE for 30 DAYS!

Vanguard is dominated by an index approach, and cap-weighted indexes at that. If one wants to go with an index, Vanguard is great, although equal-weighted indexes will do better.

Understanding ETFs

Comment posted to “The Individual Investor’s Guide to Exchange-Traded Funds 2013” in the August 2013 AAII Journal:

Written well for the average investor to understand the world of ETFs.

—Arnold Chong from Iowa

Navigating the Bid/Ask Spread on ETFs

Comment posted to “ETFs and ETNs: Knowing What You Own,” by Neil Leeson, in the August 2013 AAII Journal:

Since I am a novice investor, I invest in index mutual funds that have low expense ratios. ETFs appear to have the additional expense of dealing with the spread between the bid and asked prices. How much does the spread add to the expense ratio? Is there any way to get a handle on which ETFs or family of ETFs have the narrowest spreads?

Are inverse ETFs just for short-term use? I am tempted to invest in an inverse long-term bond fund for an ex

—Arnie Zimmer from Virginia

Editor Charles Rotblut responds:

The bid-ask spreads are transaction costs, which you only pay when you buy or sell an ETF. Conversely, the management and other fees, which are measured by the expense ratio, are paid every year you own the fund. I would be far more concerned with picking the best fund for the asset class that you are trying to target than trying to seek the narrowest bid-ask spread.

As far as inverse ETFs are concerned, read the prospectus. Many only give you the opposite return for a single day. After one day, the ETF’s return starts to differ increasingly from that of the underlying security.

Variable Spending in Retirement

Comment posted to “Safe Withdrawal Rates and Certainty-Equivalent Spending,” by Druce Vertes, in the July 2013 AAII Journal:

I’m not clear as to the meanings for the columns in Table 1, showing the initial spending shortfall severity frontier. How would the 4% line in the table play out for a $100,000 portfolio?

—RDV from Florida

Druce Vertes responds:

I wouldn’t get too hung up on the math. The point is, historically a 4% fixed rule worked. But since, as tested by William Bengen, that rule never goes up as the portfolio goes up, it doesn’t lead to high lifetime spending. If you incorporate a variable term, you get higher lifetime spending, but you have to accept some risk of a shortfall.

It’s interesting to chart that relationship and see how much additional lifetime spending you get by accepting different degrees of shortfall risk.

“Certainty-equivalent spending” is a concept that 1) lets you compare different strategies based on your level of risk aversion and 2) shows us that if you’re highly risk-averse, you’ll stick with something like the fixed 4% rule. If you’re risk-neutral, you’ll just try to maximize lifetime spending with a strategy that varies based on the size of the portfolio.


Discussion

Richard Smith from IL posted 10 months ago:

I couldn't find out how to send a note regarding another subject, so I took this avenue. I subscribe to Dividend Investors. Whenever I sign on, I go directly to that website. I wanted to make a comment about Stock Screens, but "couldn't get there from here".

My question is regarding the September 2013 issue. I am quite interested in stock screening as I thought using on would be a great help for someone like myself that doesn't have a lot of experience in dividend stock selection. I was thrilled to find this issue mentioned the process on the inside cover.

In my naivety, I thought all one had to do was enter the stock symbol and the software did the rest. I am now a little better educated, but still do not know what to do to utilize the program. What do I do now? Thanks,

Richard Smith (please don't print this, thx)


Jean Henrich from IL posted 10 months ago:

Richard Smith,
As the article explained, you can use the Stock Screen Characteristics table to help you choose a screen that fits your investing philosophy - there are a couple of dividend screens. Then, you can go to that screen's page (by clicking on the screen name) and choose "Passing Companies" to see a list of stocks that currently meet the criteria for your chosen screen. Use these lists to choose stocks that you think merit further investigation. Go to http://www.aaii.com/stock-screens for more help on how to use the AAII Stock Screens. Thanks for your interest.
-Jean at AAII


Larry Taylor from SC posted 10 months ago:

Good morning, I am interested in providing a mortgage of 130K on a office building.
20yr @ 6% 5 year Balloon.
I have a Roth IRA which I would like to use for this purpose.
It's asset allocation is very diversified containing US Stocks International Stocks Bonds and Cash.
What would be the best way to achieve this?


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In