Close

A Lack of Openness Between Advisers and Investors

A report from analytics firm Cerulli Associates revealed differences in how investors and financial advisers perceive their financial relationship. Investors either misunderstand or don’t understand how their advisers are being compensated. Advisers, on the other hand, often control a smaller portion of their client’s portfolio than they otherwise believe.

On the subject of compensation, Cerulli reported, “Overall, more than 60% of investor households believe they are receiving fair value from their advice providers, though nearly two-thirds of investors either believe the advice they receive is free, or do not understand how their providers are paid. In many cases, advisers and providers fear what the reactions of clients would be if they understood how an adviser was being paid, essentially doubting their own value. By embedding fees within portfolio management costs or deducting revenues from accounts, providers are able to avoid the perceived pain-point of having investors write discrete checks to pay for the services they receive. However, in reality, if the client does not understand what they are paying, they are more likely to assume it excessive.”

Advisers, conversely, either misconstrue or are in the dark about how much of their client’s assets they actually oversee. Again from Cerulli, “Overall, 74% of investors report owning a direct investing account in addition to their primary provider relationship; however, advisers believe that just 17% of their clients hold these accounts. This discrepancy clearly underscores the difference between reality and advisers’ perceptions of their relationship with clients. The goal of traditional advisers is to manage the entirety of their clients’ portfolios, but the majority of investors prefer to keep at least a portion of their assets a secret from their advisers.”

Clearly, the report’s findings show a large communication gap between advisers and their clients. Blame for the misunderstandings is shared by both sides. Advisers are reluctant to discuss how they are compensated and investors are reluctant to reveal their entire financial picture.

For an adviser-client relationship to work properly, both parties must be upfront and open. The responsibility for this openness lies primarily on the individual investors who both must give their advisers enough information to receive proper advice and need to understand how and what they are paying in return for the adviser’s services.

Source: “Cerulli Finds More Than 60% of Investors Don’t Know How Their Providers Are Paid,” Cerulli Associates, February 26, 2013.


Discussion

Steve from Florida posted about 1 year ago:

Most investors have no idea their advisor is a salesman whose goal is to make the most commissions. Their companies measure their success by the commissions and revenue they bring to the firm. They are not measured at all by how well they do for their clients. Many clients also do not know whether they are doing well or not. Many do not even know their annual performance numbers.


Loading... from Loading... posted about 1 year ago:

Advisers never get hurt or give back part of the commission when they make bad recommendations. That creates the incentive for them to oversell investments that pay them the highest return.


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In