Our model portfolio of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) is benefiting handsomely from the positive movement in the stock market this year.
As of the end of the third quarter, the AAII Model ETF Portfolio is having an excellent year. The year-to-date return is 38.2%, compared to a return of 22.7% for our ETF benchmark.
The longer-term results can be seen in Table 1 and Figure 1. The portfolio remains slightly behind the benchmark over the complete time period since it was started. However, the primary reason for the difference in long-term performance is that the benchmark does not have a real estate component.
The Model ETF Portfolio’s real estate components are iShares Cohen & Steers Realty Majors (ICF) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate (RWX). While these two funds continue to lag, they seem to be catching up. Long-term real estate has proven to be an important part of a portfolio for both return and risk reduction.
I am disappointed in the performance of First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index (FDM; see the bottom of Table 1 for a description), but it appears the best of only three micro-cap ETFs (the other two micro-cap ETFs are PowerShares Zacks Micro Cap Portfolio and iShares Russell Microcap Index Fund).
In my judgment the weakness in First Trust is too much emphasis on growth factors, ignoring the most important value measure (price relative to book) and eliminating too many smaller companies. The alternative funds have much the same problems.
I feel that including a micro-cap ETF in the portfolio is essential, but wish there was an ETF that performed closer to the AAII Shadow Stock Model Portfolio (our own portfolio of micro-cap value stocks).
There are no changes being made to the Model ETF Portfolio at this time, and we continue to believe that these funds will outperform the benchmark over the short and intermediate term. Over the long term, we would expect some things to change and will adjust accordingly.
During much of the three-and-a- half years of the portfolio’s existence, smaller cap and value stocks have performed below their long-term averages. This appears to be reverting back to normal, and we continue to believe that value stocks, and small- and micro-cap stocks, will be the best performers over the long run. For that reason, they should be over-weighted—as they are in our ETF Portfolio.
The stock market continues to do its own thing and all of the various explanations and/or predictions from analysts and market pundits seem baseless.
According to the election year cycle, next year (2010) should be an average year (meaning about a 12% S&P 500 return). But 2008, and 2009-to-date, have made election-year cycle predictions seem silly. Of course, that may mean they will start to be meaningful again. I can see no market reason to deviate from your long-term asset allocation.
I will be reviewing the Model ETF Portfolio in this column again in May 2010, but you can follow it on a continuing basis at AAII.com. You can also view performance figures for the entire universe of ETFs in the AAII Guides area of AAII.com.
The rationale used in building the Model ETF Portfolo is to achieve diversification across the equity classes listed below while maintaining a weighting that, in our assessment of historical data, will provide the maximum opportunity for long-term rates of return. We have a bias toward smaller-cap and value stocks and so does history.
Across national boundaries—U.S. versus foreign:
We begin with an 80% U.S. and 20% foreign portfolio but this could change. Foreign stock returns involve currency relationships as well as the usual equity analysis. The initial weighting takes into consideration the fact that many U.S. companies have significant foreign involvement.
In foreign investments:
In U.S. investments:
Which specific ETFs?
Although the above outlines the areas in which we will look for ETFs, it does not explain how we will choose specific ETFs when there are multiple ETFs in an area.
It will be many years before we have enough history to develop a solid set of criteria as we have for the Model Mutual Fund Portfolio. Many of the sponsors of ETFs, however, have a history with other investment vehicles that can provide a guide, as can liquidity, expense ratios, and the philosophy espoused in prospectuses. Over time, we should be able to harden our criteria.
How the portfolio is managed
We will not make trades solely for the purpose of rebalancing, except under unusual conditions. When we make trades for other reasons, we will do so in a way that repositions the portfolio back toward the initial weighting.
The current recommended initial weighting is to give each domestic holding an equal weight (for a total of 80% in domestic ETFs) and each foreign issue an equal weight (for a total of 20% in foreign stock ETFs). If you choose not to hold a particular ETF, maintain the equal weightings in each of the domestic and foreign areas, and keep the balance of 80% domestic stock ETFs and 20% foreign stock ETFs.