The Good and Bad of Large 401(k) Plans

Large 401(k) plans, ones with numerous investment choices, can be good for the employer, but bad for the employee, according to University of Mississippi Law School assistant professor Mercer Bullard. Citing both case law and various studies, Bullard says a paradox exists.

Retirement plans, including 401(k)s, are covered by the Employee Retirement Security Income Act of 1974 ERISA. ERISA requires employers to follow the “prudent man rule,” which means making decisions with care, skill and diligence. In simpler terms, the standard requires fiduciaries to make decisions similar to what a prudent person would otherwise make in the same situation. This requirement has been used in litigation over the construction of and fees within 401(k) plans.

Bullard observes a trend in such cases of allowing employers to argue a “large menu defense.” Courts have concluded a large selection of investment options places the employee in charge of his investment decisions. Under such rulings (including Hecker v. Deere & Co.), the employer cannot be held liable for the inclusion of expensive or poor-performing funds. Conversely, Wal-Mart was found liable of managing its plan imprudently for offering a “relatively limited menu of funds which were selected by Wal-Mart executives despite the ready availability of better options.” (This case was Braden v. Wal-Mart.)

...To continue reading this article you must be registered with AAII.

Gain exclusive access to this article and all of the member benefits and investment education AAII offers.
JOIN TODAY for just $29.
Log in
Already registered with AAII? Login to read the rest of this article.

Register for FREE
to read this article and receive access to future articles.


Jack Kennard from Georgia posted 9 months ago:

Thank you, This is very timely. Monday I will be talking with out 401k manager. We do have a good assortment of stock funds to choose from, 2 bond funds, but no money market or fixed funds (never heard of that before). When I called up Nationwide they were puzzled too. My main concern of course is what will happen when the feds change their policy on rates. I feel like I'm in a dingy in the eye of a hurricane.

We will see how the “prudent man rule” applies.

Charles Schwartz from Texas posted 8 months ago:

I don't care what "humans do". I'm not in the 80% group. I'm not a group! I want options!
Charles Schwartz

You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In