Peter Katt CFP, LIC, is sole proprietor of Katt & Co., a fee-only life insurance advising firm located in Kalamazoo, Michigan (269/372-3497); www.peterkatt.com.


Discussion

Ken from GA posted over 4 years ago:

Very interesting article. I find it interesting that there is no mention of the impact of "tax free" loans and withdrawals -- often the major emphasis from agents in pitches for these types of policies -- and the author focuses on life insurance, in fact, being life insurance. So that does beg the age old question -- would a policy holder have been better off buying term or more conventional whole life insurance and avoiding the risk associated with variable life. On a personal note, I do own one of these types of polices, albeit much, much smaller than the example given. Although I have not been terribly happy with cash values performance, I have tried to make "lemonade out of lemons" by taking loans for purposes such as IRA contributions and premiums on other insurance policies while monitoring the account to make sure it is adequate to maintain the policy (I do pay back the loans).


Ryan from WA posted over 3 years ago:

I don't understand. Why would anyone ever buy universal life insurance?

Term insurance costs a tiny fraction of what universal costs (for identical coverage), and if I invest the difference that I've saved, I'll make WAY more money than the policy ever will.

Plus, under some policies, your benefitiaries don't even get to keep the "cash value" when you die. The insurance company just pockets it!


J Altenburg from NJ posted about 1 year ago:

I am still struggling to understand this product years after someone first tried to sell it to me. My view is that for most people, including myself, life insurance products should be straigtfoward and provide a high degree of certainty in both payments and proceeds. That is certainly not the case here. There are tax advantages, but after commissions to the insurance agent and management fees on a limited number of investment fund choices, I'm doubtful that those tax advantages make it worthwhile. As for the guaranteed variable universal life premium product, I would rather by a 10 to 20 year level premium term policy and a deferred annuity policy, each from different companies. At least you know what you are getting and you can obtain the coverages at the lowest price.


John Kollhoff from KS posted about 1 year ago:

@J Altenburg- You are not limited on investment choices. My wife and I are using the cash value in our life insurance for multiple investments: rental properties, purchasing a small business, and soon we will be using it to invest in a hotel project. Each of these investments is returning over 10%, which is a leveraged return, so cash-on-cash return is almost 100 percent. I'll get back to you on the hotel once it is operating.


Sorry, you cannot add comments while on a mobile device or while printing.