AAII, the American Association of Individual Investors
After lagging small stocks for so long, the larger stocks are trying to catch up.
The year-to-date return through August for the Model Shadow Stock Portfolio is 1.4%, compared to the S&P 500 index’s 9.8% return, as measured by Vanguard 500 Index fund (VFINX).
The results for longer periods can be seen in Figure 1 and Table 3. In Table 3, you can also see that larger-cap stocks have outperformed in six of the last 21 years.
Table 1 lists the current holdings in the Model Shadow Stock Portfolio.
We continue to experience a shortage of qualifying stocks. This month the only qualifiers were stocks we already owned and Chinese stocks, which we eliminate because of data uncertainty.
Due to the lack of candidates, we did not sell REX American Resources (REX), even though its price-to-book-value ratio is over the 2.4 maximum. (As shown in the Model Portfolio Rules, a stock is sold if there is a replacement for it when its price-to-book-value ratio goes above three times the initial criterion, which is currently 0.80.) Therefore, there are no buy or sell transactions to the portfolio for this period, as shown in Table 2. [Note: On October 1, 2014, Medical Action Industries (MDCI) was acquired by Owens & Minor (OMI), triggering its removal from the portfolio.]
It can be frustrating to have no qualifying stocks when following a process. If we had more than 5% in cash, we would have stretched the price-to-book-value ratio criterion to a limit of 0.90 to 0.95, since in an absolute sense anything less than 1.00 is a bargain (on average). Raising the price-to-book limit would have led to additional qualifying stocks.
| Current | 52-Week | Market | P/E | P/B | Div | |||
| Price | High | Low | Cap | Ratio | Ratio | Yield | ||
| Company (Ticker) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($ Mil) | (X) | (X) | (%) | Notes |
|
Alamo Group, Inc. (ALG)
|
49.34
|
61.27
|
44.26
|
599.4
|
17.9
|
1.61
|
0.6
|
|
|
CSS Industries Inc (CSS)
|
25.31
|
31.94
|
21.57
|
236
|
12.7
|
0.92
|
2.4
|
|
|
Ducommun Incorporated (DCO)
|
30.06
|
32.00
|
22.45
|
327.6
|
29.8
|
1.29
|
0.0
|
|
|
Ennis, Inc. (EBF)
|
14.56
|
19.59
|
13.54
|
380.6
|
29.7
|
1.03
|
4.8
|
|
|
Five Star Quality Care (FVE)
|
4.68
|
6.09
|
4.41
|
227.5
|
27.5
|
0.71
|
0.0
|
|
|
Flexsteel Industries (FLXS)
|
34.47
|
40.44
|
22.40
|
252
|
17.5
|
1.52
|
1.7
|
|
|
Hardinge Inc. (HDNG)
|
11.32
|
16.03
|
11.11
|
145.2
|
47.2
|
0.68
|
0.7
|
|
|
Hooker Furniture Corp. (HOFT)
|
15.56
|
17.81
|
13.35
|
167.3
|
19.5
|
1.22
|
2.6
|
|
|
International Shipholding (ISH)
|
22.29
|
32.91
|
20.75
|
162.8
|
29.7
|
0.50
|
4.5
|
|
|
Key Tronic Corp. (KTCC)
|
11.11
|
11.50
|
9.60
|
117.2
|
16.1
|
1.13
|
0.0
|
|
|
Kimball International (KBALB)
|
15.93
|
20.10
|
9.61
|
612.3
|
18.5
|
1.39
|
1.3
|
|
|
LMI Aerospace, Inc. (LMIA)
|
14.93
|
16.40
|
10.81
|
194.8
|
nmf
|
1.37
|
0.0
|
|
|
Marlin Business Services (MRLN)
|
19.83
|
29.58
|
17.10
|
256.1
|
14.6
|
1.48
|
2.5
|
|
|
Medical Action Indus (MDCI)*
|
13.76
|
13.85
|
5.04
|
227.3
|
229.3
|
2.01
|
0.0
|
|
|
Mitcham Industries (MIND)
|
13.34
|
17.87
|
12.65
|
169.1
|
83.4
|
0.98
|
0.0
|
|
|
Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS)
|
23.43
|
31.68
|
20.88
|
257.3
|
41.8
|
0.85
|
0.3
|
|
|
PC Connection, Inc. (PCCC)
|
22.80
|
25.94
|
14.47
|
597.9
|
15.5
|
1.76
|
0.0
|
|
|
PCM Inc. (PCMI)
|
10.17
|
11.82
|
8.95
|
125.9
|
15.0
|
0.94
|
0.0
|
|
|
RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT)
|
7.30
|
7.36
|
5.47
|
91.6
|
33.2
|
1.40
|
0.0
|
|
|
Renewable Energy Group (REGI)
|
11.88
|
16.09
|
8.51
|
502.6
|
3.2
|
0.73
|
0.0
|
|
|
REX American Resources (REX)
|
95.33
|
102.92
|
26.70
|
780
|
14.8
|
2.56
|
0.0
|
approaching value & size limit |
|
Rocky Brands Inc (RCKY)
|
14.66
|
19.97
|
13.32
|
110.6
|
15.9
|
0.84
|
2.7
|
|
|
SigmaTron International (SGMA)
|
11.28
|
12.92
|
4.26
|
45.5
|
15.7
|
0.81
|
0.0
|
|
|
Salem Communications (SALM)
|
8.23
|
10.34
|
5.04
|
207.8
|
12.9
|
1.02
|
2.9
|
|
|
Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL)
|
21.42
|
29.75
|
17.30
|
439.5
|
16.5
|
1.31
|
1.1
|
|
|
Standard Motor Products (SMP)
|
37.97
|
45.8
|
29.72
|
869.0
|
17.4
|
2.39
|
1.4
|
approaching value & size limit |
|
TravelCenters of America (TA)
|
10.52
|
11.17
|
7.01
|
396.3
|
10.0
|
0.68
|
0.0
|
|
|
VOXX International (VOXX)**
|
9.59
|
18.00
|
6.84
|
234.3
|
nmf
|
0.55
|
0.0
|
|
|
Willis Lease Finance (WLFC)
|
23.07
|
26.19
|
13.80
|
193.4
|
10.3
|
0.84
|
0.0
|
|
|
*Acquired by Owens & Minor (OMI) on October 1, 2014. |
||||||||
Approaching Size Limit: Stocks are sold if their market capitalization goes above three times the initial maximum criterion and there is a stock to replace it. The current market capitalization maximum for initial screening is $300 million. Stocks are marked “approaching size limit” if their current market cap exceeds 2½ times the initial criterion, or $750 million.
Approaching Value Limit: Stocks are sold once their price-to-book-value ratio goes above three times the initial criterion and there is a stock to replace it. The current initial price-to-book ceiling is 0.80. Stocks are marked “approaching value limit” if their current price-to-book-value ratio exceeds 2½ times the initial criterion, or 2.00.
Earnings Probation: If the last 12 months’ earnings from continuing operations are negative, the stock is put on probation; if a subsequent quarter has negative earnings prior to 12-month earnings becoming positive, the stock is sold. The date in parentheses is the fiscal quarter during which the company first reported negative trailing 12-month earnings.
Qualified as of: Stock still qualified as a buy when the screen was run with current data. Stocks that don’t currently qualify as a buy are held until they meet one of the sell rules.
Stock purchases must meet these criteria:
Stocks are sold if any of the following occur:
See the Model Shadow Stock Portfolio area of AAII.com for more information.
The election cycle indicates an above-average return in the year prior to the U.S. national election; this has been widely discussed and will be in the news as we approach 2015. Twenty years ago, I came across another cycle for which I can find no rationale but that has been pervasive for the last 100 years. It is the positive impact on the market of years ending in 5. This cycle is particularly important in years when it coincides with the election cycle. This combination occurs only every 20 years, and the year 2015 is one of those years.
I have always been suspicious of data like this that indicates a possible anomaly when I can’t find a rationale for the behavior. In the election cycle we have the rationale that government spending and talk of government spending prior to the election boosts expectations, but I cannot think of any cycle for years ending in 5, or any 10-year cycle, to explain this rather dramatic impact. While it could be coincidence, it is also possible that I simply can’t find the explanation. Note that although the data covers a large number of years, the actual sample size is small.
| Company (Ticker) | Reason |
| Buy | |
| No buys for third quater | |
| Sell | |
| No sells for third quater |
I must admit that in 1995, I was extra bullish and was rewarded. I will be a little extra bullish in 2015, although I hesitate to suggest that anyone else should do the same. But here are the numbers.
Average annual returns since 1935:
11.0% = S&P 500 index
20.7% = year 3 of the election cycle
28.4% = years ending in 5
42.4% = year 3 + years ending in 5
0 = number of times year 3 was negative
Just an observation.
Very little has changed from last quarter. The strong stock market continues. Those crying for a correction will eventually get one, but they may have missed most of a very strong upsurge before they get it. Strangely, interest rates are staying low and even going down a bit. This may be due to expectations that a really strong economy is still a year or more away. In my opinion, it’s more likely that in a mixed-up world investors are putting their money in U.S. Treasuries whether they get any return at all except for the return of their investment.
| Average Annual Return (%) | Cumulative Value of $10,000 ($) | |||||
| Model | Vanguard | Vanguard | Model | Vanguard | Vanguard | |
| Shadow | 500 | Small Cap | Shadow | 500 | Small Cap | |
| Stock | Index | Index | Stock | Index | Index | |
| Year | Portfolio | (VFINX) | (NAESX) | Portfolio | (VFINX) | (NAESX) |
|
1993
|
32.3
|
9.9
|
18.7
|
13,230
|
10,989
|
11,870
|
|
1994
|
2.0
|
1.2
|
-0.5
|
13,492
|
11,118
|
11,810
|
|
1995
|
20.7
|
37.4
|
28.7
|
16,291
|
15,282
|
15,204
|
|
1996
|
22.3
|
22.9
|
18.1
|
19,927
|
18,775
|
17,959
|
|
1997
|
44.3
|
33.2
|
24.6
|
28,756
|
25,010
|
22,375
|
|
1998
|
-8.9
|
28.6
|
-2.6
|
26,188
|
32,168
|
21,790
|
|
1999
|
0.0
|
21.1
|
23.1
|
26,187
|
38,945
|
26,831
|
|
2000
|
-7.7
|
-9.1
|
-2.7
|
24,163
|
35,418
|
26,116
|
|
2001
|
21.4
|
-12.0
|
3.1
|
29,325
|
31,160
|
26,926
|
|
2002
|
10.8
|
-22.1
|
-20.0
|
32,506
|
24,259
|
21,535
|
|
2003
|
73.1
|
28.5
|
45.6
|
56,268
|
31,174
|
31,360
|
|
2004
|
43.7
|
10.8
|
19.9
|
80,843
|
34,530
|
37,587
|
|
2005
|
17.9
|
4.8
|
7.4
|
95,353
|
36,180
|
40,376
|
|
2006
|
29.4
|
15.6
|
15.6
|
123,363
|
41,832
|
46,687
|
|
2007
|
-1.8
|
5.4
|
1.2
|
121,166
|
44,083
|
47,227
|
|
2008
|
-50.8
|
-37.0
|
-36.0
|
59,582
|
27,764
|
30,217
|
|
2009
|
72.3
|
26.5
|
36.1
|
102,665
|
35,120
|
41,130
|
|
2010
|
45.4
|
14.9
|
27.7
|
149,238
|
40,358
|
52,529
|
|
2011
|
6.3
|
2.0
|
-2.8
|
158,701
|
41,155
|
51,067
|
|
2012
|
33.3
|
15.8
|
18.0
|
211,588
|
47,666
|
60,274
|
|
2013
|
61.0
|
32.2
|
37.6
|
340,599
|
63,009
|
82,966
|
|
YTD
|
1.4
|
9.8
|
6.1
|
$345,501
|
$69,156
|
$88,063
|
|
Since Incep
|
17.8
|
9.3
|
10.6
|
$345,501
|
$69,156
|
$88,063
|
| Data as of 8/31/2014. | ||||||
Mid-term elections will be over before the next Model Shadow Stock Portfolio column in January 2015. No matter how it turns out, it seems unlikely we will have a cohesive government. But there may be more pressure to work together before 2016. In the meantime, you may follow updates to the portfolio in the Model Portfolios area at AAII.com.