Sifting through countless of stocks in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry can be tedious, and sometimes two stocks are just too similar to judge which is the better investment. If you’re on the fence about investing in Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Texas Pacific Land Corporation because you’re not sure how they measure up, it’s important to compare them on a few factors before making your decision.

Read on to learn how Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation compare based on key financial metrics to determine which better meets your investment needs.

About Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation

Diamondback Energy, Inc., an independent oil and natural gas company, acquires, develops, explores, and exploits unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas, the United States. The company primarily focuses on the development of the Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations of the Midland Basin; and the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations of the Delaware Basin, both of which are part of the Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico. Diamondback Energy, Inc. was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Texas Pacific Land Corporation engages in the land and resource management, and water services and operations businesses. The Land and Resource Management segment manages surface acres of land, and oil and gas royalty interest in Permian Basin. This segment also engages in easements, such as transporting oil, gas and related hydrocarbons, power line and utility, and subsurface wellbore easements. In addition, this segment leases its land for processing, storage, and compression facilities and roads; and is involved in sale of materials, such as caliche, sand, and other material, as well as sells land. The Water Services and Operations segment provides full-service water offerings, including water sourcing, produced-water treatment, infrastructure development, and disposal solutions to operators in the Permian Basin. This segment also holds produced water royalties. The company owns a 1/128th nonparticipating perpetual oil and gas royalty interest (NPRI) under approximately 85,000 acres of land; a 1/16th NPRI under approximately 371,000 acres of land; and approximately 33,000 additional net royalty acres, total of approximately 224,000 NRA located in the Permian Basin. The company was founded in 1888 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Latest Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Diamondback Energy, Inc., Texas Pacific Land Corporation Stock News

As of September 2, 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. had a $57.0 billion market capitalization, compared to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels median of $2.7 million. Diamondback Energy, Inc.’s stock is up 35% in 2026, up 1.2% in the previous five trading days and up 35.74% in the past year.

Currently, Diamondback Energy, Inc.’s price-earnings ratio is 39.7. Diamondback Energy, Inc.’s trailing 12-month revenue is $16.2 billion with a 9.0% net profit margin. Year-over-year quarterly sales growth most recently was 52.5%. Analysts expect adjusted earnings to reach $20.461 per share for the current fiscal year. Diamondback Energy, Inc. currently has a 2.2% dividend yield.

As of September 2, 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation had a $25.3 billion market cap, putting it in the 88th percentile of all stocks. Texas Pacific Land Corporation’s stock is up 27.6% in 2026, down 0.9% in the previous five trading days and up 16.94% in the past year.

Currently, Texas Pacific Land Corporation’s price-earnings ratio is 46.9. Texas Pacific Land Corporation’s trailing 12-month revenue is $897.5 million with a 60.3% net profit margin. Year-over-year quarterly sales growth most recently was 31.3%. There are no analysts providing consensus earnings estimates for the current fiscal year. Texas Pacific Land Corporation currently has a 0.7% dividend yield.

How We Compare Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation Stock Grades

Stock evaluation requires access to huge amounts of data and the knowledge and time to sift through it all, make sense of financial ratios, read income statements and analyze recent stock movements. AAII created A+ Investor, a robust data suite that condenses data research in an actionable and customizable way suitable for investors of all knowledge levels, to help investors streamline and work through such data.

AAII’s proprietary stock grades come with A+ Investor. These offer intuitive A‐F grades for each of five key investing factors: value, growth, momentum, earnings estimate revisions and quality. Here, we’ll take a closer look at Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation’s stock grades to see how they measure up against one another.

Learn more about A+ Investor here!

Sign Up to Receive a Free Special Report Showing How A+ Grades Can Help You Make Smarter Investment Decisions

Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation Growth Grades

Company	Ticker	Growth
Diamondback Energy, Inc.	FANG	C
Texas Pacific Land Corporation	TPL	C

The foundation of growth investing is seeking out stocks of companies exhibiting strong, consistent and prolonged growth that is expected to continue into the future.

In order to compute the growth score and assign it a letter grade, the percentile ranks for each of three components‐consistency of annual sales growth, five-year sales growth rankings adjusted for extreme levels, and consistency of positive annual cash from operations‐must be determined. These three rank figures are added together, and the sum is ranked against the entire stock universe to arrive at a company’s Growth Score to create an equal distribution of grades.

The companies in the bottom 20% of the stock universe receive Growth Grades of F, considered to be very weak, while those in the top 20% receive A grades, which are considered very strong.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a Growth Score of 59, which is Average. Texas Pacific Land Corporation has a Growth Score of 59, which is Average.

The Growth Stock Winner: No Clear Winner

Neither Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Texas Pacific Land Corporation has a high enough Growth Grade to be considered a “winner.” Investors who are considering these companies should do additional due diligence and research to see if either could be a good addition to their portfolios. It’s important to look at a wide range of financial metrics in order to determine if Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Texas Pacific Land Corporation is the better investment when it comes to sustainable growth.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation’s Momentum Grades

Company	Ticker	Momentum
Diamondback Energy, Inc.	FANG	B
Texas Pacific Land Corporation	TPL	B

Momentum grades help to uncover stocks experiencing anomalously high rates of return; research finds that stocks with high relative levels of momentum tend to outperform, whereas those with low levels of momentum tend to continue underperforming. Momentum is based on the price change of a stock over a specified period relative to all other stocks.

Typically, AAII looks at the weighted relative strength over the trailing four quarters. The weighted four-quarter relative strength rank is the relative price change for each of the past four quarters. The most recent quarterly price change is given a weight of 40% and each of the three previous quarters are given a weighting of 20%.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a Momentum Score of 65, which is Strong. Texas Pacific Land Corporation has a Momentum Score of 66, which is Strong.

The Momentum Grade Winner: It’s a Tie!

Looking at the Momentum Grade breakdown above, both Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation have a grade of B. For those who focus solely on a company’s momentum, further research will need to be conducted into both companies to see if they fit your individual needs as an investor.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation’s Estimate Revisions Grades

Company	Ticker	Earnings Estimate
Diamondback Energy, Inc.	FANG	C
Texas Pacific Land Corporation	TPL	na

Earnings estimate revisions scores consider the magnitude of a company’s earnings surprise in its last two reported fiscal quarters. Often, positive surprises beget further positive surprises‐or at least continued sales growth (the exact opposite is generally true, too).

Estimate revisions offer an indication of what analysts are thinking about the short-term prospects of a firm. Estimate revisions are based on the statistical significance of a firm’s last two quarterly earnings surprises and the percentage change in its consensus estimate for the current fiscal year over the past month and past three months.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. has a Earnings Estimate Score of 52, which is Neutral. Texas Pacific Land Corporation does not have a meaningful Earnings Estimate Score.

The Earnings Estimate Revisions Stock Winner: No Clear Winner

Neither Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Texas Pacific Land Corporation has an Earnings Estimate Revisions Grade that could be considered a “winner.” Investors considering these companies should do additional due diligence and research to see if either could be a good addition to their portfolios. It’s important to look at a wide range of financial metrics in order to determine if Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Texas Pacific Land Corporation is the better investment when it comes to estimate revisions.

Other Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation Grades

In addition to Momentum, Growth and Estimate Revisions, A+ Investor also provides grades for Value and Quality.

Successful stock investing involves buying low and selling high, so stock valuation is an important consideration for stock selection. Buying stocks that are going to go up typically means buying stocks that are undervalued in the first place, although momentum investors may argue that point.

AAII’s A+ Investor Quality Grade comes from the ranking of key metrics. Specifically, the quality grade is the percentile rank of the composite of return on assets (ROA), return on invested capital (ROIC), gross profit relative to assets, buyback yield, change in total liabilities to assets, accruals, Z double prime bankruptcy risk (Z) score and F-Score.

These 2 key factors, when combined with the above, provide a holistic view into a particular stock. Further, by joining A+ Investor you can see whether Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation pass any of our 60+ stock screens that have outperformed the market since their creation.

So, Which Is the Better Investment, Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Texas Pacific Land Corporation Stock?

Overall, Diamondback Energy, Inc. stock has a Growth Score of 59, Momentum Score of 65 and Estimate Revisions Score of 52.

Texas Pacific Land Corporation stock has a Growth Score of 59, Momentum Score of 66 and Estimate Revisions Score of .

Comparing Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation’s grades, scores and metrics can act as a solid basis to determine whether they may be a good investment or not. You’ll also want to look at your portfolio’s asset allocation as well as your risk tolerance and financial goals to see if either of these stocks would make a good fit for you. AAII can help you figure out which investments align with your individual needs and preferences.

Investors are encouraged to do their own due diligence and research. In this way, individuals can effectively become managers of their own assets‐without having to rely on others for financial independence. You can count on AAII for timeless articles on financial planning and stock-picking, unbiased research and actionable analysis.

A+ Investor adds to our qualitative teaching with a powerful data suite to help you whittle down investment choices to find stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or mutual funds that meet your needs.

AAII Disclaimer

We make no representations or warranties that any investor will, or is likely to, achieve profits similar to those shown, because past, hypothetical or simulated performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Before making an investment decision, you should consider your circumstances and whether the information on our content is applicable to your situation. This information was prepared in good faith, and we accept no liability for any errors or omissions. The full disclaimer can be read here.