Sifting through countless of stocks in the Ground Transportation industry can be tedious, and sometimes two stocks are just too similar to judge which is the better investment. If you’re on the fence about investing in Uber Technologies, Inc. or Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. because you’re not sure how they measure up, it’s important to compare them on a few factors before making your decision.

Read on to learn how Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. compare based on key financial metrics to determine which better meets your investment needs.

About Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

Uber Technologies, Inc. develops and operates proprietary technology applications in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. The company operates through three segments: Mobility, Delivery, and Freight. The Mobility segment connects consumers with a range of transportation modalities, such as ridesharing, carsharing, micromobility, rentals, public transit, taxis, and other modalities; and offers riders in a variety of vehicle types, as well as financial partnerships products and advertising services. The Delivery segment allows consumers to search for and discover restaurants to grocery, alcohol, convenience, and other retailers, as well as order a meal or other items, and either pick-up at the restaurant or have it delivered; and provides Uber direct, a white-label delivery-as-a-service for retailers and restaurants, as well as advertising services. The Freight segment manages transportation and logistics networks, which connects shippers and carriers in digital marketplace, including carriers upfronts, pricing, and shipment booking; and offers on-demand platform to automate logistics end-to-end transactions for small-and medium-sized businesses to global enterprises. The company was formerly known as Ubercab, Inc. and changed its name to Uber Technologies, Inc. in February 2011. Uber Technologies, Inc. was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a freight transportation company in the United States and Mexico. The company operates through four segments: Truckload, LTL, Logistics, and Intermodal. The Truckload segment offers irregular route, dedicated, refrigerated, flatbed, expedited, and cross-border services. The LTL segment provides regional direct service and serves its customers' national transportation needs by utilizing key partner carriers for coverage areas outside of its network. The Logistics segment provides brokerage and other freight management services utilizing third-party transportation providers and equipment. The Intermodal segment offers transportation services, including arranging the movement of customers' freight through third-party intermodal rail services on its trailing equipment; and drayage services to transport loads between the railheads and customer locations. The company also provides repair and maintenance shop services, equipment leasing, warranty services, and insurance; and trailer parts manufacturing, warehousing, and certain driving academy activities. It serves retail, food and beverage, consumer and paper products, transportation and logistics, housing and building, automotive, and manufacturing industries. The company was incorporated in 1989 and is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.

Latest Ground Transportation and Uber Technologies, Inc., Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. Stock News

As of June 5, 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. had a $143.9 billion market capitalization, compared to the Ground Transportation median of $6.0 million. Uber Technologies, Inc.’s stock is down 13.5% in 2026, up 0.4% in the previous five trading days and down 15.27% in the past year.

Currently, Uber Technologies, Inc.’s price-earnings ratio is 17.5. Uber Technologies, Inc.’s trailing 12-month revenue is $53.7 billion with a 15.9% net profit margin. Year-over-year quarterly sales growth most recently was 14.5%. There are no analysts providing consensus earnings estimates for the current fiscal year. Uber Technologies, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend.

As of June 5, 2026, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. had a $12.8 billion market cap, putting it in the 81st percentile of all stocks. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.’s stock is up 50.3% in 2026, up 3.9% in the previous five trading days and up 75.85% in the past year.

Currently, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.’s price-earnings ratio is 375.9. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.’s trailing 12-month revenue is $7.5 billion with a 0.5% net profit margin. Year-over-year quarterly sales growth most recently was 1.4%. Analysts expect adjusted earnings to reach $1.898 per share for the current fiscal year. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. currently has a 1.0% dividend yield.

How We Compare Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. Stock Grades

Stock evaluation requires access to huge amounts of data and the knowledge and time to sift through it all, make sense of financial ratios, read income statements and analyze recent stock movements. AAII created A+ Investor, a robust data suite that condenses data research in an actionable and customizable way suitable for investors of all knowledge levels, to help investors streamline and work through such data.

AAII’s proprietary stock grades come with A+ Investor. These offer intuitive A‐F grades for each of five key investing factors: value, growth, momentum, earnings estimate revisions and quality. Here, we’ll take a closer look at Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.’s stock grades to see how they measure up against one another.

Learn more about A+ Investor here!

Sign Up to Receive a Free Special Report Showing How A+ Grades Can Help You Make Smarter Investment Decisions

Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. Growth Grades

Company	Ticker	Growth
Uber Technologies, Inc.	UBER	D
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.	KNX	A

The foundation of growth investing is seeking out stocks of companies exhibiting strong, consistent and prolonged growth that is expected to continue into the future.

In order to compute the growth score and assign it a letter grade, the percentile ranks for each of three components‐consistency of annual sales growth, five-year sales growth rankings adjusted for extreme levels, and consistency of positive annual cash from operations‐must be determined. These three rank figures are added together, and the sum is ranked against the entire stock universe to arrive at a company’s Growth Score to create an equal distribution of grades.

The companies in the bottom 20% of the stock universe receive Growth Grades of F, considered to be very weak, while those in the top 20% receive A grades, which are considered very strong.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a Growth Score of 40, which is Weak. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. has a Growth Score of 95, which is Very Strong.

The Growth Grade Winner: Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

As you can clearly see from the Growth Grade breakdown above, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. has a more attractive growth grade than Uber Technologies, Inc.. For investors who focus solely on how a company is growing relative to other companies in the same industry, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. could be a good stock to add to their portfolio. However, it’s important for investors to analyze multiple factors based on a wide range of metrics before deciding whether to buy.

Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.’s Quality Grades

Company	Ticker	Quality
Uber Technologies, Inc.	UBER	A
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.	KNX	B

Like the Value Grade, AAII’s A+ Investor Quality Grade comes from the percentile rank of key metrics. Specifically, the Quality Score is the percentile rank of the average of the percentile ranks of return on assets (ROA), return on invested capital (ROIC), gross profit relative to assets, buyback yield, change in total liabilities to assets, accruals, Z double prime bankruptcy risk (Z) score and the F-Score.

The score is variable, meaning it can consider all eight measures or, should any of the eight measures not be valid, the remaining measures that are valid. To be assigned a Quality Score, stocks must have a valid (non-null) measure and corresponding ranking for at least four of the eight quality measures.

The Quality Score is used to assess the underlying “quality” of a particular stock. A higher-quality stock possesses traits associated with upside potential and reduced downside risk. Backtesting of the Quality Grade shows that stocks with higher grades, on average, outperformed stocks with lower grades over the period of 1998 through 2019.

Stocks receive better grades (higher scores) for having higher scores for the quality subcomponents and worse grades (lower scores) for lower scores for the subcomponents.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a Quality Score of 88, which is Very Strong. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. has a Quality Score of 62, which is Strong.

The Quality Grade Winner: Uber Technologies, Inc.

As you can clearly see from the Quality Grade breakdown above, Uber Technologies, Inc. has a better overall quality grade than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.. For investors who are looking for companies with higher quality than others in the same industry, Uber Technologies, Inc. could be a good stock to add to their portfolios. However, it’s important for investors to analyze multiple factors based on a wide range of metrics before deciding whether to buy.

Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.’s Momentum Grades

Company	Ticker	Momentum
Uber Technologies, Inc.	UBER	D
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.	KNX	A

Momentum grades help to uncover stocks experiencing anomalously high rates of return; research finds that stocks with high relative levels of momentum tend to outperform, whereas those with low levels of momentum tend to continue underperforming. Momentum is based on the price change of a stock over a specified period relative to all other stocks.

Typically, AAII looks at the weighted relative strength over the trailing four quarters. The weighted four-quarter relative strength rank is the relative price change for each of the past four quarters. The most recent quarterly price change is given a weight of 40% and each of the three previous quarters are given a weighting of 20%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a Momentum Score of 28, which is Weak. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. has a Momentum Score of 85, which is Very Strong.

The Momentum Grade Winner: Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

As you can clearly see from the Momentum Grade breakdown above, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. is considered to have stronger momentum compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.. For those specifically looking for companies that have stronger momentum compared to other companies in the same industry, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. could be a good stock to invest in. However, it’s important for investors to analyze multiple factors based on a wide range of metrics before deciding whether to buy.

Other Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. Grades

In addition to Growth, Quality and Momentum, A+ Investor also provides grades for Value and Estimate Revisions.

Earnings estimate revisions scores take into account the magnitude of a company’s earnings surprise in its last two reported fiscal quarters. Often, surprises beget further surprises‐or at least continued sales growth (the exact opposite is generally true, too).

Successful stock investing involves buying low and selling high, so stock valuation is an important consideration for stock selection. Buying stocks that are going to go up typically means buying stocks that are undervalued in the first place, although momentum investors may argue that point.

These 2 key factors, when combined with the above, provide a holistic view into a particular stock. Further, by joining A+ Investor you can see whether Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. pass any of our 60+ stock screens that have outperformed the market since their creation.

So, Which Is the Better Investment, Uber Technologies, Inc. or Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. Stock?

Overall, Uber Technologies, Inc. stock has a Growth Score of 40, Momentum Score of 28 and Quality Score of 88.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. stock has a Growth Score of 95, Momentum Score of 85 and Quality Score of 62.

Comparing Uber Technologies, Inc. and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.’s grades, scores and metrics can act as a solid basis to determine whether they may be a good investment or not. You’ll also want to look at your portfolio’s asset allocation as well as your risk tolerance and financial goals to see if either of these stocks would make a good fit for you. AAII can help you figure out which investments align with your individual needs and preferences.

Investors are encouraged to do their own due diligence and research. In this way, individuals can effectively become managers of their own assets‐without having to rely on others for financial independence. You can count on AAII for timeless articles on financial planning and stock-picking, unbiased research and actionable analysis.

A+ Investor adds to our qualitative teaching with a powerful data suite to help you whittle down investment choices to find stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or mutual funds that meet your needs.

AAII Disclaimer

We make no representations or warranties that any investor will, or is likely to, achieve profits similar to those shown, because past, hypothetical or simulated performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Before making an investment decision, you should consider your circumstances and whether the information on our content is applicable to your situation. This information was prepared in good faith, and we accept no liability for any errors or omissions. The full disclaimer can be read here.