A Rules-Based Approach to Managing a Portfolio

by Charles Rotblut | April 06, 2017

A prelude to this week’s commentary: BlackRock made financial news headlines by announcing a change in how some of its active mutual funds will be managed. Rather than rely on human stock picking, the company is shifting to a heavy reliance on quantitative strategies. Commentary about the change was quick to use the word “robots” to describe the funds’ new managers.

BlackRock’s decision comes as the active versus passive debate continues. Just five days after BlackRock’s announcement, The Wall Street Journal ran an article headlined, “Active Managers Stage a Comeback.” The article, citing data from Morningstar, said that 45% of all active U.S.-based managers (including stock and bond fund managers) beat their respective index alternatives.

Those of you looking at this back-and-forth between the so-called quants and traditional active strategies should realize that you don’t need to have a proverbial dog in this fight. You can choose quantitative strategies or you can choose to use a blend of quant and active. You do this by following a rules-based approach to portfolio management. The checklist displayed to the right is a simplistic, though effective, example of how quantitative and active approaches can be combined into a followable strategy.

At the very top of the list is asset allocation. There are complex mathematical models for how to do this, but ultimately, the proper asset allocation for each person requires active involvement. No mathematical formula can convey the fear you will feel when a bear market causes your net worth to plunge. For most investors, the correct allocation involves an allocation to stocks just below breakpoint where they panic and abandon their strategy during a bear market. Strategies such as keeping a buffer in cash (e.g., one to four years of living expenses for retirees) can push this breakpoint upward, allowing you to allocate more to stocks.

The second step is to fill the portfolio with passive index funds, or at least benchmark to them if an active approach is preferred. Diversified, widely followed index funds (e.g., the S&P 500, the Russell 2000, etc.) should be the default choices unless you have a strategy for realizing high returns, more portfolio income or less volatility. If you are unable to achieve one of these three goals over the long term with an active fund or strategy, go passive. Index investing, which is a form of quantitative investing, has proven to a be a tough benchmark to beat over the long term.

If you want to use active strategies, create rules for how you will select and monitor investments. Regardless of whether you intend to buy individual securities or actively managed funds, have a clearly defined process for how you will identify them, analyze them and determine when it is time to sell them. These rules will take the emotions out of your decisions and will lead to higher returns. Quantitative figures (valuation, momentum, fundamental ratios, a fund’s long-term performance relative to its peers, etc.) work very well at making these rules effective.

Once the rules are created, you must follow them. This may seem like a silly thing to write, but rules only work if they are followed. The advantage of having software make decisions over humans is that software never hems and haws about whether a rules-based action should be taken. Humans can and do look for excuses. (And yes, there are times when it makes sense to break the rules, but those occurrences should be well-defined exceptions—such as selling in response to news about a company’s CEO cooking the books—and not the norm.)

The rules should also include guidelines for how and when your portfolio’s allocation will be adjusted. Fund families using quantitative strategies can have software do this for them. Individual investors can simplify the process by periodically checking allocations against the target. For example, if an asset class (or an individual holding) becomes too excessively weighted relative to your target, pare back your portfolio’s exposure to it.

Finally, think long-term. No approach to investing—be it quantitative, active or a rules-based blend—is going to work all of the time. Investing success comes from the discipline of sticking to a well-thought-out strategy regardless of whether market conditions are favorable or unfavorable.

More on AAII.com
AAII Sentiment Survey

Pessimism among individual investors about the short-term direction of stock prices rose to nearly 40%, according to the latest AAII Sentiment Survey. At the same time, optimism fell below 30%.

Bullish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will rise over the next six months, fell 1.9 percentage points to 28.3%. This is the 11th time out of the last 12 weeks that optimism is at or below its historical average of 38.5%.

Neutral sentiment, expectations that stock prices will stay essentially unchanged over the next six months, declined 0.3 percentage points to 32.1%. The historical average is 31.0%.

Bearish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will fall over the next six months, rose 2.2 percentage points to 39.6%. The increase keeps pessimism at or above its historical average of 30.5% for the eighth consecutive week and the 11th out of the last 12 weeks.

This week’s results put optimism very close to the bottom of its typical range and pessimism very close to the top of its typical range. A bullish sentiment reading below 28.1% would be unusually low (more than one standard deviation below average.) A bearish sentiment reading above 40.0% would be unusually high (more than one standard deviation above average). Of the two, unusually low bullish sentiment readings have a much stronger record as a contrarian indicator, with the S&P 500 realizing a median gain of 6.3% over the following six-month periods.

The potential impact that President Trump could have on the domestic and global economy continues to cause uncertainty or concern among some investors, while encouraging others. At the same time, the prevailing level of valuations and the lack of downside volatility have increased concern about the potential for a forthcoming drop in stock prices.

This week’s special question asked AAII members to explain how the success or failure of the Trump administration’s proposed policies influence their outlook for stock prices. Responses were mixed. Nearly one out of four respondents (24%) think the president’s policies will have a positive impact, particularly those policies that go beyond health care (tax reform, deregulation, etc.). Conversely, nearly 22% think Washington politics could have a negative impact on the market either by allowing his proposals to move forward or by having the proposals snagged in gridlock or otherwise not passed. An additional 11% say President Trump is causing them to be more cautious, with some of these respondents describing him as being too unpredictable. About 19% say the president is not influencing or otherwise factoring into their outlook. Some of these respondents described his rhetoric as just being noise, while others say they are more focused on fundamental factors. A little under 8% say that it is still too early to tell what impact the administration’s policies will have on the market.

Here’s a sampling of the responses:

  • “There should be success if taxes are lowered and regulations are reduced.”
  • “I believe something ‘crazy’ could happen and lead to investors panicking.”
  • “Not at this time—it’s all political hot air. Stock prices reflect relative value and earnings growth.”
  • “Success—good; failure—bad.”
  • “If he cannot break the legislative logjam, we are headed for a recession.”
  • “The outlook for stock prices is uncertain since the details of the Trump administration’s policies and how they will be implemented are yet unknown.”


This week’s Sentiment Survey results:

Bullish: 28.3%, down 1.9 points
Neutral: 32.1%, down 0.3 points
Bearish: 39.6%, up 2.2 points

Historical averages:

Bullish: 38.5%
Neutral: 31.0%
Bearish: 30.5%
Take the Sentiment Survey.

Discussion

No comments have been added yet. Add your thoughts to the discussion!

You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In