‘Value’ Mutual Funds Aren’t Composed of ‘Value’ Investments

Mutual funds that claim to focus on investments having factors shown be associated with higher long-term returns are found to be doing the exact opposite.

Mutual funds that claim to focus on investments having factors shown to be associated with higher long-term returns—such as small size, low investment growth, high momentum and high book-to-market ratios—are found to be doing the exact opposite. Most of the mutual funds that portray themselves as ‘value’ funds are investing in growth-type investments, according to a recent study.

The researchers focused on fund-level characteristics, such as the popular book-to-market ratio. This ratio divides the book value of a stock by its market value (shareholder’s equity/market capitalization). A high book-to-market ratio (above 1.0) implies that the stock is undervalued, and a low book-to-market ratio (below 1.0) implies that the stock is overvalued (the book-to-market ratio is the inverse of the price-to-book-value ratio).

The study consisted of a sample of 2,638 mutual funds, where 574 identified as ‘value’ funds and 1,130 as ‘growth’ funds. The book-to-market ratios of the funds were ranked based on quintile scores that ranged from 1 to 5, corresponding to low to high book-to-market ratio quintiles, respectively.

Forty percent of all mutual funds have a book-to-market score between 1 and 2 (indicating book-to-market ratios ranking in the lowest 20% and 40%, respectively) and 51% score between 2 and 3. Only 9% of all funds have a book-to-market score between 3 and 4, and only 0.26% of the funds in the sample have a score higher than 4. The bulk of the ‘value’ funds have book-to-market scores between 2 and 3.5. This contrasts with the S&P 500 index, where 46% of stocks have a book-to-market score above 3 and 18% above 4, according to the study.   

The authors conclude that 95% of portfolios of ‘growth’ funds hold over a quarter of their portfolios in low book-to-market stocks, while ‘value’ funds hold a larger portion of their portfolio in stocks with low book-to-market ratios. This is in opposition to the definition of ‘value’ investing, which looks for high book-to-market investments.

Source: “Characteristics of Mutual Fund Portfolios: Where Are the Value Funds?,” by Martin Lettau, Sydney Ludvigson and Paulo Manoel; Centre for Economic Policy Research discussion paper, December 14, 2018.

Discussion

Jim from Kentucky posted over 7 years ago:

I do own a value fund. How/where can I acquire the book to market ratio of the fund that I own?


Doug from NY posted over 7 years ago:

Finance.yahoo.com has this sort of information (under the "Holdings" tab, along with other potentially-useful statistics).


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: