Three Pillars for Successful Dividend Investing

A look at a total-return strategy that seeks stocks that have the potential to rise in price and make larger dividend payments in the future.

Derek Hageman leads a class in AAII's new Essential Investing Video Course. Go to https://www.aaii.com/ves for more information and to subscribe.

Since 1926, dividends have accounted for more than 40% of the return realized by investing in large-cap stocks. The frequently cited 9.9% historical annual return for stocks is significantly impacted by the payment of dividends. Ibbotson Associates, which tracks long-term historical returns, says that if dividends were taken out of the equation, the long-term annual return for stocks would fall to a more modest 5.5%

How do you become a successful dividend investor? For our AAII Dividend Investing (DI) newsletter, we seek stocks that have the potential to rise in price and make larger dividend payments in the future—a total-return strategy. To achieve these goals, our approach focuses on three pillars for dividend investment decisions.

Our three pillars of dividend investing are a firm’s growth trends, financial strength/quality and valuation. Successful dividend-paying stocks must possess good business models, strong balance sheets, growth in sales and earnings, positive free cash flow, attractive valuations and a history of rising dividend payments. In this article, we explain each of the three pillars.

Pillar I: Growth Trends

There are several characteristics to consider when assessing the growth trends of dividend-paying stocks. The DI approach analyzes a company’s record of growth in revenue, earnings and cash flow. Also examined are profit margins, earnings surprises and estimates, dividend history and dividend growth trends. These growth trends are used because a company’s success is driven by its ability to generate sales and convert the revenue into earnings and cash flow.

Strong sales growth is meaningless if management allows costs and expenses to grow disproportionately. Therefore, it is useful to analyze the profitability of a company by calculating and tracking various profit margin ratios—gross margin, operating margin and net margin. Net margin is the “bottom line” profit that is generated from all phases of the business, including interest and taxes. The net margin compares net income to sales.

Profit margins are expressed as percentage ratios to facilitate the comparison of a wide range of companies that vary in size. The term for comparing a company to other firms is cross-sectional analysis, and ratios such as profit margins make comparisons across companies meaningful. However, it is important to note that margins can differ from industry to industry, so it is vital to compare firms in similar lines of business. Profit margins provide a great window into company and industry trends, the competitive environment and management’s ability to manage costs.

Pillar II: Financial Strength/Quality

In order to determine the financial strength and quality of a company, you need to understand its underlying financials and its ability to generate cash flow, pay its obligations and return capital to shareholders. The DI approach looks at a company’s leverage ratios, cash flows, payout ratios (earnings and cash flow) and capital returned to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks. These items are monitored to ensure that a company can continue raising its dividends.

One of the key characteristics that dividend investors look for in a company is free cash flow. Free cash flow is calculated by deducting capital expenditures (capex) from cash from operations (both are listed on the cash flow statement). Free cash flow indicates whether a company is generating enough cash from its normal business operations to fund its capex and still have money available to pay a dividend, buy back shares or make acquisitions.

One way to evaluate the safety of a company’s dividend is by examining its free cash flow relative to its dividend—its free-cash-flow payout ratio. This ratio analyzes how much cash a company is paying in dividends as a percentage of free cash flow. Investors should look to the free-cash-flow payout ratio to understand if a company is generating enough cash to cover its dividends year to year. If it is not, the dividend payment may not be sustainable.

Pillar III: Valuation

Valuation is another key component in seeking attractive dividend-paying stocks. Stock prices tend to fluctuate between high and low extreme valuation levels; these relationships can be used to determine a stock’s value range. The DI approach looks at two valuation metrics: dividend yield and the trailing price-earnings ratio (P/E).

The primary valuation measure is relative dividend yield (annual indicated dividend per share divided by price per share). The dividend yield can be used to calculate a valuation estimate, indicating if a stock is expensive relative to its historical norm. The DI approach seeks out undervalued dividend-paying stocks with current yields above their five-year historical average, yet that are expanding their dividend payments at a greater-than-average rate. Overvalued stocks whose current yields are below their five-year averages are avoided.

The price-earnings ratio is another cornerstone measure of value used in dividend investing. The price-earnings ratio is determined by dividing a stock’s price by its earnings per share reported over the most recent four quarters. It is called a trailing price-earnings ratio when historical earnings are used in the calculation. It is important to see how trailing price-earnings ratios compare with historical averages. A price-earnings ratio lower than its historical average would be a potential sign that the stock is undervalued and vice versa.

Formulas for calculating the measures mentioned here are given in Table 1.

A version of this article originally appeared in the June 14, 2019, AAII Dividend Investing Weekly Update.

Discussion

Steve P from GA posted over 7 years ago:

One can't help but wonder if applying the analysis described herein would have warned the investor of the recent fiasco's with GE and Dow Dupont? Much of the data mentioned would seem not to be available other than quarterly. By such time, does it provide warning, or merely confirmation? I am a strong believer in the value of dividend stocks, so the analysis is worth the effort if it provides sufficient signal relevance. I will be working on a spreadsheet soon.


Jim Treonis from FL posted over 6 years ago:

Thanks for the Interesting article. How about some examples. How about some numbers to look for. For example, debt-to-total-capital-ratio less than 30%, ideal.


Jean from AAII posted over 6 years ago:

Jim, you can see a sample of stocks that daily meet the basic criteria for AAII Dividend Investing at the Stock Ideas area: www.aaii.com/stockideas. Scroll down to section titled "Ideas From Our Premium Portfolios."


Dave G from WA posted over 6 years ago:

Derek, I am not sure I can reconcile the fact that Ibbotson Associates claims if dividends were "taken out of the equation" then the annual return of stocks would drop by 4.5%. Do they mean that if every company stopped paying dividends then those companies would be worth less? Does that then mean that on a relative basis, companies that never paid a dividend such as Amazon would then be worth more? Look at it from your own analysis of the balance sheet fundamentals. What happens when a company stops paying a dividend? They have more cash on the balance sheet than they had before. Is having more cash in the current year than the year before a problem of concern or is it possibly helpful for the company to pay down debt?


Dave G from WA posted over 6 years ago:

One other point to understand is the parameter that all Financial Analysts are concerned about (or at least should be) is the Total Return of the investment. Whether that investment Total Return includes a dividend or not does affect its worth to the investor over the time period in question. What does hurt the investment is that the investor is not in control of when all of the total return is paid out and often companies continue to pay out that total return (in the form of dividends) when they probably should be conserving their cash. Bottom line, while much of the analysis of how to find good companies in this article makes a lot of sense, whether they pay a dividend or not does nothing to further the business needs of running the company and only decreases the amount of cash they have on hand to run the business.


John VK from California posted over 6 years ago:

Very nice article discussing the 3 pillars of Div Investing (Company Growth Trends, Company Financial Strength (Quality) and Share Valuation) Growth includes Net Revenue grw, Net Earnings grw, EPS grw, and Div/Sh grw. Financial Strength usually includes Liquidity Ratios, Solvency Ratios, and Profitability Ratios (like Net Profit Margin, ROA, ROE), Valuations covers EPS fwd grw, PE chg over time, Div yld, and the classic P/S, P/B, P/Cash flow, and PEG ratios. But what specific parameters do you use to measure "Quality"? Quality is used also in the new A+AAII investing tool, and in other newsletters. Logically if it were the same as Financial Strength, it would not need be listed as a separate category, and if there criteria (parameters) overlap with Financial Strength, one would erroneously be measuring the same criteria twice. To make a long question "short", are there specific criteria one uses to measure the "Quality" of an Investment that are readily available?


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: