Investors Have Difficulty Valuing Annuities

In an attempt to understand why investors do not usually see annuities as a viable risk-transfer option, the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR) looked for a cognitive bias.

Investors and economists do not share the same opinions about annuities. Economists like annuities because they transfer the risk of outliving one’s savings to a third party (meaning an insurer). Individual investors, however, commonly do not view these products in the same manner.

In an attempt to understand the reasons why, the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR) looked to see if there is a cognitive bias against annuities. Specifically, CRR researchers sought to determine if investors dislike annuities because they find them hard to value.

The researchers asked 2,210 individuals to value hypothetical changes in their monthly Social Security benefit. Study participants were asked how much they would pay to raise their monthly benefit by $100 and how much they would demand in exchange for a $100 decrease. In both instances, the initial offer was $20,000 and was adjusted based on the amount a respondent was willing to transact at. In theory, the transaction amount for receiving a $100 per month boost or accepting $100 per month reduction should be the same; the results proved otherwise.

The median price the study’s participants were willing to pay for an additional $100 monthly benefit was $3,000. On the other hand, participants demanded a median compensation of $13,750 in exchange for a $100 reduction. To put these numbers in perspective, the lifetime value of a $100 monthly Social Security benefit is $16,855. The researchers say this experiment shows the difficulty investors have in valuing annuities. By not comprehending the value of a future stream of income, investors lack the ability to determine if an annuity is a good choice or not.

The researchers further found that altering how the question was asked changed how participants valued the change in benefits. Specifically, offering an initial lump sum of $30,000, instead of $20,000, increased the median amount participants demanded for a $100 per month benefit cut. The researchers say this behavior is further evidence that many investors have difficulty assessing the actual value of an annuity.

Source: “Are Cognitive Constraints a Barrier to Annuitization?” Jeffery Brown, Arie Kapteyn, Erzo Luttmer and Olivia Mitchell, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, March 2015, Number 15-6.

Discussion

James Whaley from TX posted over 11 years ago:

The difficulty analyzing this problem straightforwardly is the uncertainty of the payout period. Social Security benefits cease at death, an unknown variable. Determining present values of annuity payments therefore represent a best guess, results of which are bound to be all over the board.


William Gaul from IL posted over 11 years ago:

Many (or most) of the experts in the media do not like annuities. They state all the costs, etc. However they rarely (or never) mention Vanguard. I have two variable annuities with them and they are great. No sales fees and no surrender charges. Also, with annuities, there are no RMDs and no required withdrawls until age 85, as opposed to IRAs.


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: