Warren Buffett’s instructions for allocating the cash bequeathed to his wife are 10% in short-term government bonds and 90% in a S&P 500 index fund. This simple allocation, though aggressive, has historically worked well for retirees who were willing to cope with higher levels of volatility.
Business school professor Javier Estrada tested Buffett’s suggested allocation globally using rolling 30-year retirement periods between 1900 and 2014. Because Buffett did not list any specific guidelines for how to implement and follow the suggested allocation, Estrada made a few assumptions. He used a 4% withdrawal rate, with the initial withdrawal rate adjusted upward for inflation. Withdrawals were made proportionately to the target allocation. The portfolios were rebalanced back to the 90/10 allocation after the withdrawals were made.
Failure—defined as outliving one’s savings—occurred during 28.1% of all 30-year periods across the 21 countries studied. In the United States, a retiree would have outlived savings during 2.3% of all 30-year rolling periods. (The failure rate was 0.0% for a 60/40 allocation.)
The variance of returns—as measured by standard deviation—increased as the proportion allocated to stocks rose, and fell as the allocation to stocks fell. This implies that a retiree takes on greater wealth uncertainty with a higher allocation to stocks. Nonetheless, wealth at the end of the 30-year periods (“terminal wealth”) was highest with the most aggressive allocations to stocks, a finding that held true for both the best and worst 30-year cycles. Though retirees bore greater uncertainty in terms of return with higher allocations to stocks, they were rewarded with higher levels of terminal wealth.
Estrada also tested a modified version of the 90/10 allocation strategy. Withdrawals were made either from stocks or from bonds depending on the five-year annualized return of stocks. If the five-year return of stocks was above the annualized return of stocks from the start of retirement to the current year, withdrawals were made from stocks and the portfolio was rebalanced. If not, withdrawals were made from bonds and the portfolio was not rebalanced. This tweak resulted in volatility and downside risk nearly identical overall to the aforementioned approach, while providing higher terminal wealth during good periods.
“Global Asset Allocation in Retirement: Buffett’s Advice and a Simple Twist,” Javier Estrada, SSRN, July 2016.
William from CA posted over 9 years ago:
John Perry from PA posted over 9 years ago:
DwarkaR from USA posted over 9 years ago:
Charles Rotblut from IL posted over 9 years ago:
Mitchell Meyers from AE posted over 9 years ago:
Dave Gilmer from WA posted over 9 years ago:
Dave Gilmer from WA posted over 9 years ago:
P Rathinasamy Pa from FL posted over 9 years ago:
P Rathinasamy Pa from FL posted over 9 years ago:
Gordon Robinson from NC posted over 9 years ago:
Gordon Robinson from NC posted over 9 years ago:
Samuel Shepard from LA posted over 9 years ago:
Jeff from NY posted over 9 years ago:
Ralph Rice from NJ posted over 9 years ago:
Vaidy Bala from AB posted over 9 years ago:
You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Log InCreate an account