The Factors Driving Dividend Policy

An analysis of global dividend policies attributed the rationale for companies to pay and raise their dividends to many factors, including communicating information, so-called “agency costs,” tax policy and a company’s maturation.

An analysis of global dividend policies attributed the rationale for companies to pay and raise their dividends to many factors, including communicating information, so-called “agency costs,” tax policy and a company’s maturation.

Companies can use dividends to convey, or “signal,” information about their financial strength and prospects. For instance, a common perception is to view dividend-paying companies as having more financial stability or otherwise being less risky.

Reaction to changes in the dividend is long-standing evidence of signaling. Stocks of companies that raise or initiate dividends outperform over time, in aggregate. Conversely, stocks of companies that cut or suspend their dividends underperform. Such actions are viewed by investors as conveying strength (weakness) and optimism (pessimism).

In common law countries, such as the United States, shareholders have no legal right to dividend payments. Rather, dividends are paid solely at the discretion of the board of directors. This structure creates an “arms-length” separation between shareholders and corporate executives. It also creates what is known as an agency cost, by forcing a company to choose between holding onto its free cash and distributing it out to investors as an incentive to invest in the company. From the standpoint of shareholders, dividends reduce the agency cost by making the executives think more carefully about how they utilize free cash flow. Executives who know they have to make regular dividend payments should be more careful with their spending decisions.

The taxation of dividends should be unimportant to a company’s payout policy. Tax policies do matter to investors, however, and this in turn has an influence on a company’s dividend policy. Following the 2003 tax cut in the U.S., which lowered the dividend tax rate to a then top rate of 15% (the top tax rate is now 20% plus a 3.8% surtax), a large number of companies either initiated dividends or increased their dividends.

Finally, dividend policy is dependent on where a company is in terms of its “life cycle.” Established firms with greater retained earnings are more likely to pay dividends, in part because of demand by investors for more cash to be returned to them as retained earnings grow in size.

Source: “Dividend Policy: A Selective Review of Results From Around the World,” Laurence Booth and Jun Zhou, Global Finance Journal accepted manuscript.

Discussion

Thomas Hawkinson from IL posted over 7 years ago:

Interesting, but missing the point. The company's dividend policy for a solid long term investment should be management's decision about whether the company's earnings should be paid to shareholders as a dividend, or used by the company to add to it's asset base to produce additional earnings. The other possibility is to retain earnings for the purpose of buying back shares of the company. The bottom line for the decision is which of these alternatives will produce the highest rate of return to the shareholder.


Seetha Kasturi from AZ posted over 6 years ago:

Missing another point: Buybacks help goose earnings and executive compensation in less public ways. Dividends do not! This has been one the major considerations of dividend policy setting for the last decade or two.


Mary Murray from CA posted over 6 years ago:

However, companies that pay too high dividends are considered suspect. What is the balance point?


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: