Based on key financial metrics such as the price-to-sales ratio, shareholder yield and the price-earnings ratio, the following 4 stocks made the list for top value stocks in the Investment Holding Companies industry. Those looking for value stocks to add to their portfolio may want to use this list as a starting point for further investment research.
Why Focus on Undervalued Investment Holding Companies Stocks?
Value investors seek to buy stocks at a discount to their intrinsic value. Long-term returns show that such strategies are advantageous. Value stocks, as a group, tend to outperform growth stocks over extended periods of time. Typically, value investors perform financial analysis of numerous metrics, don’t follow the herd and are long-term investors.
AAII’s A+ Investor Value Grade is derived from a stock’s Value Score. The Value Score is the percentile rank of the average of the percentile ranks of the price-to-sales ratio, price-earnings ratio, enterprise-value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio, shareholder yield, price-to-book-value ratio and price-to-free-cash-flow ratio. The score is variable, meaning it can consider all six ratios or, should any of the six ratios not be valid, the remaining ratios that are valid. To be assigned a Value Score, stocks must have a valid (non-null) ratio and corresponding ranking for at least two of the six valuation ratios.
What Goes Into AAII’s Value Grade?
Stock evaluation requires access to huge amounts of data as well as the knowledge and time to sift through it all, make sense of financial ratios, read income statements and analyze recent stock movement. AAII created A+ Investor, a robust data suite that condenses data research in an actionable and customizable way suitable for investors of all knowledge levels, to help investors with that task.
AAII’s proprietary stock grades come with A+ Investor. These offer intuitive A–F grades for more than just value. It is possible for a stock to appear cheap based on one valuation metric but appear expensive on another. It is also possible for one valuation ratio to be associated with outperforming stocks during certain periods of time but not others. Some stocks may even have null values for certain metrics like the price-earnings ratio or the price-to-book ratio but not others. An example of this would be a company with losses instead of profits or a negative book value because of heavy borrowing. Negative earnings or book value result in non-meaningful ratios that are left blank or null.
Click the button below to learn more about A+ Investor and subscribe today.
4 Undervalued Investment Holding Companies Stocks
Of course, there are countless value stocks that are worth mentioning, but this is a concise list of the top 4 undervalued stocks in the Investment Holding Companies industry for Monday, September 04, 2023. Let’s take a closer look at their individual scores to see how they measure up against each other and the Investment Holding Companies industry median.
| Company | Ticker | Price/Sales | Price/Earnings | EV/EBITDA | Shareholder Yield | Price/Book Value | Price/Free Cash Flow | Value Grade |
| Calethos Inc | BUUZ | na | 1.0 | 1.3 | 44.2% | na | na | A |
| Cannae Holdings Inc | CNNE | 2.40 | na | na | 9.7% | 0.58 | na | A |
| Next Meats Holdings Inc | NXMH | 1.15 | na | na | (0.4%) | 0.63 | na | B |
| RegenETP, Inc | RGTPQ | na | na | 0.1 | (117.6%) | 0.04 | na | B |
The Value Grade is assigned based on how each stock’s composite valuation compares to all other stocks.
The process for assigning grades starts with each variable for a given stock. The percentile rankings for all valid ratios that a stock has are calculated. So, for instance, a stock could have a price-to-book ranking in the 43rd percentile, a price-earnings ranking in the 67th percentile, a price-to-sales ranking in the 23rd percentile, etc. Then, those rankings are averaged for each stock. (A minimum of two valid variables are required, though all six will be used if available.)
Once the average of the individual variables is calculated, that average is ranked against all stocks. Put another way, each stock’s composite valuation is compared to all other stocks. These ranks are then sorted into quintiles from the cheapest 20% (a grade of A) to the most expensive 20% (a grade of F).
As always, we recommend that you conduct proper due diligence and research before investing in any security. We also suggest that investors utilize numerous grades, not just value, when it comes to deciding whether a company is a good fit for their allocation needs.
Calethos Inc’s Value Grade
Value Grade:
| Metric | Score | BUUZ | Industry Median |
| Price/Sales | na | na | 10.70 |
| Price/Earnings | 1 | 1.0 | 65.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4 | 1.3 | 6.5 |
| Shareholder Yield | 3 | 44.2% | 31.8% |
| Price/Book Value | na | na | 2.88 |
| Price/Free Cash Flow | na | na | 66.1 |
CalEthos, Inc. is focused on building a clean-energy-powered, modular immersion and liquid cooled data center that provides colocation data center services to enterprise information technology (IT) customers. In addition, the Company may acquire assets and all or part of other companies operating in the high-density computing industry or invest or joint venture with other more-established companies already in the industry.
Stocks with a Value Score from 81 to 100 are considered deep value, those with a score between 61 and 80 are value and so on.
Calethos Inc has a Value Score of 100, which is considered to be undervalued.
Calethos Inc’s price-earnings ratio is 0.96 compared to the industry median at 65.89. This means it has a lower share price relative to earnings compared to its peers. This could make Calethos Inc more attractive for value investors.
Now, let’s assess Calethos Inc’s EV/EBITDA ratio, also known as enterprise multiple. At 1.3, when compared to the industry median of 6.5, the company may be considered undervalued in relation to its peers. Value investors could use the enterprise multiple to identify stocks that are considered overvalued or undervalued relative to their industry.
Shareholder yield is the sum of a stock’s dividend yield (paid over previous 12 months minus special dividends) and the percentage of net share buybacks over the previous 12 months. Calethos Inc’s shareholder yield is higher than its industry median ratio of 31.77%. Value investors may look for an attractive shareholder yield because it can be a powerful tool for identifying if the company has a good management team.
Cannae Holdings Inc’s Value Grade
Value Grade:
| Metric | Score | CNNE | Industry Median |
| Price/Sales | 62 | 2.40 | 10.70 |
| Price/Earnings | na | na | 65.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | na | na | 6.5 |
| Shareholder Yield | 9 | 9.7% | 31.8% |
| Price/Book Value | 12 | 0.58 | 2.88 |
| Price/Free Cash Flow | na | na | 66.1 |
Cannae Holdings, Inc. is a diversified holding company, which is engaged in managing and operating a group of companies and investments, as well as making additional majority and minority equity portfolio investments in businesses. The Company operates through its wholly owned subsidiary, Cannae Holdings, LLC (Cannae LLC). Its segments include Restaurant Group, Dun & Bradstreet, Paysafe, Alight and Sightline. Its Dun & Bradstreet segment offers business decisioning data and analytics. Alight segment provides cloud-based integrated digital human capital and business solutions. Paysafe segment enables businesses and consumers to connect and transact through capabilities in payment processing, digital wallet, and online cash solutions. Restaurant Group segment consists of its operations of O'Charley's and 99 Restaurants. Sightline segment includes its Sightline Payments, which is a digital payments provider and mobile application developer to the sports betting and casino gaming market.
Stocks with a Value Score from 81 to 100 are considered deep value, those with a score between 61 and 80 are value and so on.
Cannae Holdings Inc has a Value Score of 87, which is considered to be undervalued.
Cannae Holdings Inc’s price-to-book ratio is higher than its peers. This could make Cannae Holdings Inc less attractive for value investors when compared to the industry median at 2.88.
You can read more about Cannae Holdings Inc’s key financial metrics like shareholder yield, price-to-free-cash-flow and EV/EBITDA ratio, or learn more about its Momentum and Growth Grades, by subscribing to A+ Investor.
Next Meats Holdings Inc’s Value Grade
Value Grade:
| Metric | Score | NXMH | Industry Median |
| Price/Sales | 38 | 1.15 | 10.70 |
| Price/Earnings | na | na | 65.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | na | na | 6.5 |
| Shareholder Yield | 54 | (0.4%) | 31.8% |
| Price/Book Value | 14 | 0.63 | 2.88 |
| Price/Free Cash Flow | na | na | 66.1 |
Next Meats Holdings, Inc., formerly Turnkey Solutions, Inc., is a shell company. The Company is created to affect an asset acquisition, merger, exchange of capital stock or other business combination with a domestic or foreign business. The Company has no operations. It has no revenues.
Stocks with a Value Score from 81 to 100 are considered deep value, those with a score between 61 and 80 are value and so on.
Next Meats Holdings Inc has a Value Score of 73, which is considered to be undervalued.
Next Meats Holdings Inc’s price-to-book ratio is higher than its peers. This could make Next Meats Holdings Inc less attractive for value investors when compared to the industry median at 2.88.
You can read more about Next Meats Holdings Inc’s key financial metrics like shareholder yield, price-to-free-cash-flow and EV/EBITDA ratio, or learn more about its Momentum and Growth Grades, by subscribing to A+ Investor.
RegenETP, Inc’s Value Grade
Value Grade:
| Metric | Score | RGTPQ | Industry Median |
| Price/Sales | na | na | 10.70 |
| Price/Earnings | na | na | 65.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0 | 0.1 | 6.5 |
| Shareholder Yield | 97 | (117.6%) | 31.8% |
| Price/Book Value | 1 | 0.04 | 2.88 |
| Price/Free Cash Flow | na | na | 66.1 |
PolarityTE, Inc. is a biotechnology company developing regenerative tissue products and biomaterials. Its first regenerative tissue product is SkinTE. Its SkinTE is intended for the repair, reconstruction, replacement, and supplementation of skin in patients who have a need for treatment of acute or chronic wounds, burns, surgical reconstruction events, scar revision, or removal of dysfunctional skin grafts. The Company's development projects include SkinTE Point-of-Care Device, SkinTE Cryo and Other Tissue Regeneration Products. SkinTE Cryo allows it to offer multiple deployments from one original harvest through a cryopreservation process. The core technology of SkinTE is minimally polarized functional units (MPFUs). MPFUs are multi-cellular segments created from a piece of the patient’s healthy skin.
Stocks with a Value Score from 81 to 100 are considered deep value, those with a score between 61 and 80 are value and so on.
RegenETP, Inc has a Value Score of 78, which is considered to be undervalued.
RegenETP, Inc’s price-to-book ratio is higher than its peers. This could make RegenETP, Inc less attractive for value investors when compared to the industry median at 2.88.
You can read more about RegenETP, Inc’s key financial metrics like shareholder yield, price-to-free-cash-flow and EV/EBITDA ratio, or learn more about its Momentum and Growth Grades, by subscribing to A+ Investor.
Other Investment Holding Companies Stock Grades
Value is just one of the five Stock Grades included in our A+ Investor service. AAII members can see the top-graded stocks—those with grades of A or B for value, growth, momentum, earnings estimate revisions and quality—on the A+ Stock Grades Screener.
Also, if you want full access to all of AAII’s premium services, you can subscribe to one convenient bundled plan called AAII Platinum where you can try out A+ Investor, AAII Dividend Investing, the Stock Superstars Report, Growth Investing and VMQ Stocks. With the other premium services, you can dive deep into additional metrics, portfolios, commentary and information about Investment Holding Companies stocks as well as other industrys.
Choosing Which of the 4 Best Investment Holding Companies Stocks Is Right for You
Choosing which value stocks to invest in will ultimately depend on your individual goals and allocation; however, comparing similar value stocks in the same industry can help you analyze which might be better investments for you in the long run. So, let’s take a look at the Value Grade for all of our stocks.
- Calethos Inc stock has a Value Grade of A.
- Cannae Holdings Inc stock has a Value Grade of A.
- Next Meats Holdings Inc stock has a Value Grade of B.
- RegenETP, Inc stock has a Value Grade of B.
Now that you have a bit more background about each of the 4 undervalued stocks in the Investment Holding Companies industry as well as their overall grades, it’s time for you to conduct additional research to see if these could fit your portfolio needs based on your goals and risk tolerance. AAII can help you figure out both and identify which investments align with what works best for you.
We do so through a program of education that teaches you to invest for yourself and become an effective manager of your own wealth—no more relying on others for your financial independence. You can rely on AAII for timeless articles on financial planning and stock-picking, unbiased research and actionable analysis that makes you a better investor.
A+ Investor adds to that qualitative teaching by giving you a powerful data suite that helps you whittle down investment decisions to find stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or mutual funds that meet your needs.
Additional Resources About Investment Holding Companies Stocks
Want to learn more about Investment Holding Companies stocks to see if they could be the right investment for you? Check out some additional resources and articles to help you on your financial journey.
- 4 Undervalued Investment Holding Companies Stocks for Monday, September 04
- 4 Undervalued Investment Holding Companies Stocks for Friday, September 01
- 4 Undervalued Investment Holding Companies Stocks for Wednesday, August 30
- 3 Undervalued Investment Holding Companies Stocks for Tuesday, August 29
AAII Disclaimer
We make no representations or warranties that any investor will, or is likely to, achieve profits similar to those shown, because past, hypothetical or simulated performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Before making an investment decision, you should consider your circumstances and whether the information on our content is applicable to your situation. This information was prepared in good faith and we accept no liability for any errors or omissions. The full disclaimer can be read here.
Included With AAII Platinum
Screen: 23.7%
Annual Gain Since Inception. Data as of 12/31/2024.
769.3% Stock Superstars Portfolio Total Return Since Inception
U.S. Index ETF (IYY)
SSR Group 3 O'Shaughnessy portfolio has a 411.2% gain since inception performance compared to IYY at only 119.1%% Performance as of 11/29/24.
FREE REPORT
BECOME A MEMBER FOR ONLY $2
Get access to powerful investment discovery tools and a wealth of investment education to help you achieve your financial goals.