Environmental Regulation Uncertainty Pushes Bond Yields Up

Uncertainty about future environmental regulatory changes is raising the perceived risk of bonds from issuers with poor environmental profiles or high carbon emissions. 

Uncertainty about future environmental regulatory changes is raising the perceived risk of bonds from issuers with poor environmental profiles or high carbon emissions. As a result, these bonds are assigned lower credit ratings and investors are demanding higher yields from them.

Researchers used two criteria to determine how the environmental profiles of corporations affected the perception of their credit risk. One was environmental, social and governance (ESG) from third-party ratings agency Sustainalytics. The second was carbon emissions data from the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). Companies were assigned a score of 0 to 100, with a higher numerical score indicating stronger environmental performance. Additionally, credit ratings were assigned on a range of 1 to 22. Each numerical value represented a specific Moody’s rating, with 1 matching the lowest rating of D and 22 matching the highest rating of Aaa.

Bond issuers with better environmental emissions scores tend to have stronger credit ratings. Specifically, an increase in an issuer’s environmental score of one point is associated with a statistically significant 0.027 increase in credit ratings (higher numbers indicate a better credit rating). The reverse is true for greater carbon emissions. A one-ton increase in carbon intensity per $1,000 of revenue decreases a firm’s credit rating by 0.514. The relationship signals pricing in of carbon risk by the bond markets.

Credit Ratings of High Carbon Emission Industries’ Bonds Before and After the Paris Agreement  (better credit ratings are designated by high numbers)

Following the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, a significant increase in perceived regulatory risk for companies with high emissions was observed. Consequently, firms located in states that have more restrictive environmental procedures showed a more significant association with the trend of decreased credit ratings and increased spreads.

When examining corporate bonds, potential environmental risk is a concern to both credit ratings analysts and investors. Increased environmental regulation is associated with increased costs, and those who are deemed the worst offenders in terms of emissions are more likely to see those costs reflected in their bond prices.

Source: “Climate Regulatory Risk and Corporate Bonds,” by Lee H. Seltzer, Laura Starks and Qifei Zhu; National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022.

Discussion

MICHAEL H from FL posted over 4 years ago:

To comply with the Paris Climate agreement, bureaucrats in the Netherlands, Germany, Canada and others are mandating that farmers reduce their use of fertilizers. This is misguided. At a time when hundreds of millions of people around the world are either experiencing hunger today or will experience hunger in the coming year, this policy will exacerbate the food crisis. Sadly, the proponents of the Paris agreement and ESG seem to have little concern for the poorest of the world. Most of them have incomes in the top 2%, so they would scarcely notice if food prices increased by 20-50%. The article referenced below states that "sustainability" and "ethics" are two different things. It appears that many leading proponents of sustainability believe the world has too many people. https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-03-06/esg-funds-ukraine-russia


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: