Ways to Boost Returns Following a Change to the S&P 500 Index

Passive funds tracking market-capitalization-weighted indexes like the S&P 500 index generally buy high and sell low as they attempt to mimic changes made to the index.

Passive funds tracking market-capitalization-weighted indexes like the S&P 500 index generally buy high and sell low as they attempt to mimic changes made to the index.

This trading can lead to tracking error, which is the difference between a fund’s returns and the index’s returns. Tracking error can be positive (better returns than the index) or negative (worse returns).

Seeking alternatives to this buy high/sell low phenomenon, researchers proposed three strategies: Trading ahead of index funds, delaying fund reconstruction by three months to 12 months, or straying away from direct replication of an index fund.

During the period of October 1989 to June 2021, stocks added to the S&P 500 outperformed by 46.5%, on average, in the 12 months leading up to the index announcement date. Stocks removed from the index trailed the index by an average of 36.3% over the same period. Fund managers who could trade the shares of the discretionary deletions on the day after the announcement would have gained a 12-basis-point (0.12%) advantage over the S&P 500.

S&P 500 Additions and Discretionary Deletions’ Performance Relative to Market, Oct 1989–Jun 2021

Another strategy involves delaying a portfolio change until three months and 12 months after the index announcement. This strategy outperforms the S&P 500 by 13 basis points (bps) and 23 bps, respectively. By not tracking the index fully, the fund is able to avoid the buy high/sell low phenomenon.

The third strategy is cap-weighting stocks based on fundamental size. Fundamental size is “a blend of company book value adjusted for intangibles, past five-year-average sales adjusted for company debt-to-asset ratio, past five-year-average cash flow adjusted for company R&D expenses and past five-year-average of dividends plus share repurchases, each measured as a percentage of the publicly traded universe.” Such a strategy would have outperformed by 46 bps.

Source: “The Avoidable Costs of Index Rebalancing,” by Rob Arnott, Chris Brightman, CFA, Vitali Kalesnik, Ph.D., and Lillian Wu; Research Affiliates, 2022.

Discussion

Greg F from AR posted over 3 years ago:

This article has confused me a bit. It seems to me that holding individual sector funds should perform about the same as the aggregate S&P 500 funds because their buy/sell behavior should be about the same. So sector rotation seems to be the best way to adjust the portfolio to give a chance for better growth to me. What say you?


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: