The S&P 500 Outcasts: Picking Up the Dropped Stocks

As a starting point for investors, this First Cut lists stocks possibly neglected due to their removal from the S&P 500 index.

Featured Tickers:

While companies celebrate inclusion into the S&P 500 index, for every company added, one must be removed. Many have observed the “index effect,” the initial price boost after the announcement of a stock being added to the index, as well as the initial price decline for stocks removed from the index for reasons other than a buyout or merger.

However, William Hester of Hussman Funds observed that when you examine full-year performance, portfolios of stocks removed from the index for reasons other than buyouts outperformed those of added stocks. He points out that these neglected and underappreciated stocks may have “more life left in them than most investors expect.”

More recently, research by Rob Arnott of Research Affiliates found that companies dumped from major indexes fare surprisingly well on average. As it turns out, these discretionary dumped stocks are typically temporarily out-of-favor, unloved stocks priced attractively relative to the stocks replacing them in the index. As a whole, deletions have fallen by more than half relative to the market in the year prior to their removal from the index. Arnott’s research noted that deletions outperformed the market by more than 5% per year for the next five years after the change. The research led to the creation of the Research Affiliates Deletion ETF (NIXT).

This issue’s First Cut shows the most recent 20 firms that have been removed from the S&P 500 for reasons other than being bought out or taken private. The First Cut listing indicates when and why a stock was removed from the index. Market capitalization (price times share outstanding) is used by S&P to measure size, and companies must currently have a minimum market cap of $18.0 billion for inclusion in the S&P 500. Most companies were removed because they became too small. The listing also includes the earnings for the most recent year and the consensus earnings estimate for the current fiscal year to help measure near-term profitability. The ratio of total liabilities to assets is a simple measure of financial leverage. The 52-week price change highlights recent stock market performance.

Not all stocks removed from the S&P 500 go on to outperform the market. However, a contrarian investor may find a few true bargains among these outcast stocks.

Companies Removed From the S&P 500

Tudor Pop provided research assistance.

Discussion

ROBERT A from NC posted over 1 year ago:

NIXT has a 0.39% expense ratio. That nixes it for me.


JOHN L from NJ posted over 1 year ago:

Larry Swedroe just published an article titled the "Markets Becoming More Efficient: The Disappearing Index Effect" in which he shows that "The average effect of being removed from the S&P 500 was -4.6% in the 1980s, -16.1% in the 1990s, -12.4% from 2000-2009, and a statistically indistinguishable from zero -0.6% from 2010-2020." AAII spends too much time data mining in a effort to find historical opportunities for market beating returns. And misleads novice investors who naively believe these opportunities will continue in the future.


MARY M from CA posted over 1 year ago:

"deletions have fallen by more than half relative to the market in the year prior to their removal from the index" Half of what?


BARRY J from TX posted over 1 year ago:

I tried to find some clues as to why these 20 companies might be good prospects. Their only "crime" was that their mkt cap dropped below the 18B min to be in SPX. #1 Mkt cap has 2 parameters - price x volume. 4 improved 52-week price performance; 1 did not. Volume data was not provided. #2 Did EPS drop? No, 85% improved EPS YOY. #3 Only 3 have TA/TA "debtor" percentages. #4 Only 2 made more than one "positive" sort cutoff. Mystery solved: #5 Did sector matter? 50% were CD (6) or HC (4); 30% IND (3) or FIN (3); and 20% IT (2), MAT (1), COMM (1); 4 sectors not included. #5 No clues in the clues closet here, Clouseau. #6 Just as it was in Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes case "Silver Blaze," THE clue needed to solve this mystery was what did not happen. The omitted data we need to estimate the probability of recovery is how dependent each is on imported/exported good/services and USD and forex. Those will be precious data for the future near-term. Sacre Bleu. C'est résolu. Cue the Pink Pather theme.


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: