Robo-Advice Update for 2025: Continued Consolidation and Greater Customization

With the initial wave of users onboarded, leading robo-advisers are shifting their focus to profitability.

Featured Tickers:
  • Highlights robo-adviser industry trends, including closures, fee changes and specialty portfolios
  • Ranks top robo platforms based on cost, performance and features
  • Long-term returns show best-performing portfolios favored large-cap U.S. stocks and municipal bonds

Condor Capital Wealth Management publishes The Robo Report, a free, comprehensive quarterly newsletter covering the digital advice industry. The report currently tracks 33 live accounts across 24 robo-advice providers. Our mission at Condor Capital Wealth Management remains the same: to bring transparency to automated investment services and help investors understand how the major players stack up.

With a few exceptions, the portfolios we track represent moderate to moderately aggressive risk profiles, targeting roughly 60% equities and 40% fixed income. All portfolio performance commentary in this article is for the period ended March 31, 2025.

Robo-Advice Industry Highlights

Each spring, we review the prior year’s developments and provide AAII members with an update on robo-advice products, corporate activity and portfolio results. Since Betterment and Wealthfront launched in 2008, digital advice has moved from a start-up novelty to a mainstream channel, yet the past 12 months underscore how difficult it is to scale low-cost advice while earning a profit.

Major exits and acquisitions continued following the completion of robo-service Marcus’ sale of its investment accounts to Betterment and the closure of JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s (JPM) robo-adviser offering in 2024. Adding to this trend, Ellevest, a platform initially focused on women investors, announced the closure of its digital robo-adviser service earlier this year to concentrate on serving higher-net-worth clients. Most recently, UBS decided to sunset its Advice Advantage robo-adviser. Stand-alone robos without banking or brokerage cross-sell remain a rarity.

With the initial wave of adopters onboarded, leading robo-advisers are shifting their focus to profitability. After seven years of free service, SoFi implemented a 0.25% annual management fee in late 2024. While some robo-advisers increased fees, Vanguard sought to widen its reach by reducing the minimum for its Digital Advisor service to just $100. Meanwhile, Wealthfront recently announced that it has achieved profitability by maintaining its low-cost digital model and supplementing income with cash management services, demonstrating that a path to profit exists with the right strategy and scale.

As the industry matures, innovation is moving toward portfolio customization. Firms are adding more sophisticated options: For example, Betterment launched its Goldman Sachs Tax-Smart Bonds portfolio in July 2024, and Wealthfront introduced its Automated Bond Ladder in May 2024. SoFi began offering alternative investments, such as private credit and real estate funds. This expansion typifies a broader shift where features like direct indexing (owning the individual stocks instead of an index fund) and thematic tilts give seasoned investors more granular control while preserving a guided path for newcomers.

Artificial intelligence (AI) represents the next major battleground, but its deployment is constrained by strict fiduciary regulations. While firms like Robinhood—which acquired AI planner Pluto in July 2024 and launched its robo-adviser in March 2025—aim to build personalized strategies, these features are often framed as suggestions rather than formal advice. Regulators are watching closely, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) penalizing firms for “AI washing” in 2024 and making AI in portfolio management and marketing a 2025 examination priority. Consequently, firms must implement robust governance to manage algorithmic biases and prevent misleading claims.

Top Picks Among Robo-Advice Platforms

Our top pick this year for best overall robo-adviser is Vanguard Personal Advisor.

Vanguard offers a two-tier structure that strikes a balance between accessibility and depth. Vanguard Digital Advisor is a fully digital service that needs only a $100 opening balance and caps costs at 0.20% per year. Vanguard Personal Advisor is the hybrid solution that pairs investors depositing $50,000 or more with licensed advisers for just 0.30%–0.31% per year. Both tiers inherit Vanguard’s trademark focus on low fees and straightforward planning tools, with intuitive goal-tracking and clear progress reports that earned some of the highest feature scores in our Robo Ranking Winter Edition.

Vanguard dedicates the fixed-income sleeve to municipal bonds, a decision that has recently boosted aftertax returns as municipals outpaced corporates. Coupled with Vanguard’s legacy of broad, low-cost index exposure on the equity side, this mix has propelled Vanguard Personal Advisor near the top of our three- and five-year performance tables. The combination of disciplined asset allocation, cost efficiency and optional human guidance firmly establishes Vanguard Personal Advisor as the best overall robo-adviser for investors who want digital convenience without sacrificing comprehensive advice.

Best for First-Time Investors

Fidelity Go is our top pick for new investors.

It removes entry barriers with no management fee on the first $25,000, and it charges 0.35% only on accounts exceeding $25,000. Its clean, mobile-friendly dashboard simplifies goal-setting and progress-tracking, complemented by Fidelity’s extensive learning resources.

Substantial large-cap equity allocation has driven robust three- and seven-year performance. Low costs, an intuitive experience and a proven track record make Fidelity Go an ideal launchpad.

Best Digital Financial Planner

Robo-adviser Empower sets the benchmark for digital financial planning.

Its robust suite handles diverse goals (retirement, home purchases, college funding) with specialty modules like a retirement fee analyzer. Users can model multiple spending goals and debt paydown and view aggregated finances from linked accounts in one dashboard. The Investment Checkup feature diagnoses portfolio drift and suggests tax-aware rebalancing, even for external holdings. While detailed, its breadth and flexibility empower personalized road maps, making it this year’s best digital planner.

Best for Complex Financial Planning Needs

For individuals with complex financial planning needs, digital tools provide valuable insights, but combining robo-adviser services with access to live financial advisers often delivers the most comprehensive support.

Vanguard Personal Advisor remains the top choice for complex financial planning, offering a blend of digital and human advisory services for sophisticated needs. Vanguard’s hybrid model service tier is appealing for its affordability and accessibility. With a minimum investment of $50,000, clients can engage with a live adviser for a 0.30%–0.31% management fee. Investors allocating $500,000 or more gain a dedicated adviser, maintaining the same competitive fee structure. This approach allows investors to model multiple financial goals and manage assets more effectively at a significantly lower cost than the traditional 1% fee typically charged by human advisers.

Performance Returns for Robo-Advisers

Table 1 and Figure 1 show returns for the major robo-advisers over the trailing one-year, three-year, five-year and seven-year periods ended March 31, 2025, as tracked by The Robo Report.

TABLE 1 Returns for Major and Other Selected Robo-Advisers

Top Performers Over Three Years

Over the past three years ended March 31, 2025, Fidelity Go, SoFi and Wealthfront delivered the strongest total returns, largely due to their significant allocations to U.S. equities. The S&P 500 index returned an annualized 9.03% during this period, substantially outperforming the MSCI EAFE index’s 6.68% annualized return and the MSCI Emerging Markets index’s 1.84% annualized return. Notably, Wealthfront and SoFi each allocated 76% to domestic equities, while Fidelity Go allocated 69%, all of which are above the typical robo-adviser allocation of around 66%.

The interplay between growth and value stocks continued to influence returns, though the performance gap has narrowed in recent three-year periods. The Russell 3000 Growth index returned an annualized 9.62%, compared to 6.24% for the Russell 3000 Value index. SoFi, with a 31% allocation to growth stocks (above the peer average of 27%), benefited from this tilt. Fidelity Go and Wealthfront, holding around 25% in growth stocks, also captured upside from the relative strength of large-cap growth leaders, which dominated the broader U.S. market.

In fixed income, municipal bonds played a crucial role in bolstering portfolio performance for these leaders. This focus proved beneficial, as evidenced by the Bloomberg Municipal Bond index’s annualized return of 1.53% over the period. This contrasted favorably with the Bloomberg US Corporate Bond index, which posted a 1.14% annualized loss, underscoring the resilience and tax advantages municipal bonds offered during this time frame. All three top-performing portfolios incorporated significant municipal bond allocations.

FIGURE 1 Taxable Returns of Top-Performing and Prominent Robo-Advisers

Top Performers Over Seven Years

Over the past seven years, Fidelity Go, Wealthfront and Zacks Advantage were the standout performers, concentrating on large-cap U.S. stocks and anchoring their bond sleeves with municipal securities. This U.S.-centric approach proved highly advantageous, as the S&P 500 generated an impressive 13.21% annualized return, significantly outpacing the MSCI EAFE’s 5.96% return. Zacks Advantage held a prominent 81% in domestic equities, while Wealthfront and Fidelity Go, with 73% and 69% domestic allocations, respectively, also maintained strong U.S. tilts.

The dominance of large-cap equities over small caps was a persistent theme. The Russell 1000 index delivered a 12.92% annualized return, which was significantly higher than the Russell 2000 index’s 5.37% annualized return. Growth stocks also continued to outpace value over this extended period, with the Russell 3000 Growth returning 15.37%, versus 8.92% for the Russell 3000 Value. Interestingly, despite its 35% value allocation, Wealthfront still outperformed due to its U.S. mega-cap holdings. In comparison, Fidelity Go and Zacks Advantage’s more balanced growth/value exposure—25% growth/29% value for Fidelity Go, 25% growth/30% value for Zacks Advantage—underscored that broad U.S. large-cap exposure was key.

In the fixed-income arena, municipal bonds provided stability and competitive returns. The Bloomberg Municipal Bond returned 2.07% annually over seven years, outperforming the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond index’s 1.57% return, though it trailed the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield index’s 4.94% return over the same period. Fidelity Go (91% of fixed income in municipals), Zacks Advantage (97%) and Wealthfront (80%) all featured substantial municipal bond allocations. These tax-advantaged securities helped cushion portfolios against the impact of fluctuating interest rates and provided a steady income stream.

By combining a persistent tilt toward large-cap domestic equities with a disciplined municipal bond core, Fidelity Go, Zacks Advantage and Wealthfront effectively captured the upside of a long U.S. bull market while managing risk, solidifying their standing as leading robo-advisers over the past seven years. 

Discussion

BARRY J from TX posted about 1 year ago:

Ken, thank you for your very informative article in the long line of AAII articles you have provided previously. #1 This may be the 4th of 5th robo advisor report I have read in 1q-2q25. #2 The Condor report was the most informative because it (1) focused on the main anomaly factors deployed and relative results achieved, (2) the allocation decisions that made the difference in returns, and (3) provided industry and benchmark performance comparisons. #3 The fact that some big fintechs are bailing and AI technology is advancing foretells the fate these consolidations will bring for future costs of services. These consolidations remind me of the interplay of the competitive forces that turned the 1999-2000 internet boom into the 2001-2002 bust. #4 The information in the data trends in Table 1/Figure 1 resemble the zig-zag search of an ant forward, sideways, AND backward to find food that sustains the mound. #5 The evolutionary trend of the fintech industry since John Bogle and James Cloonan democratized individual investing 50 years ago is that individual investors will gravitate to companies that provide the best returns at lower costs. #6 This history provides an omen for financial advisors who will face increasing difficulty justifying the value of their “personalized “services provided through AI bots which will soon be licensed and commercially available as costs comparable to the learning curve ETFs used to compromise the value proposition of mutual funds. #7 Even fussbudget, bossy, and opinionated Lucy Van Pet got the price for her services down to 5 cents. There are clues in this screed as to WHO done it, HOW, WHERE, and WHEN in here somewhere, Clouseau.


ROBERT A from NC posted about 1 year ago:

A good low-expense-ratio domestic equity index ETF (SCHG and FTEC come to mind) compares favorably to these robos. And I don't know, but I suspect, that the after-tax returns make the ETFs look even better. I'll put the robos in the same category as "professional" advisors---and stay away from them.


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: