Developing Sell Rules for Stocks Based on Your Buy Criteria

A clearly defined process for making sell decisions prevents emotions from taking over. One method is to base your rules on the criteria used for considering a stock.

Stock investing requires individuals and institutions to have a repeatable process. Much like a week of camping in a remote forest requires planning and strategy, so does investing in stocks. Both require research and discipline for success to occur. Too often people are so enamored by what could go right, they forget to think about an exit plan. Knowing what would cause you to sell a stock is critically important to a successful investment strategy.

The Importance of Well-Defined Sell Rules

Predefined sell rules help you answer the question of whether to hold or sell a stock. In addition, sell rules remove emotions from the decision. For example, say you follow a value-based strategy and bought a stock that rose 50% over the course of a year. Your continued analysis of the stock tells you that it is potentially overvalued, but given the stock’s performance, you believe that it still has some upside. What should you do?

It’s not unusual to become attached to a stock you own that’s having a good run. However, the decision to hold based on this emotional attachment ignores whether the stock actually has upside potential based on its investment characteristics. Though this is a hypothetical situation, many investors have experienced a version of it in their investing journeys. Well-defined sell rules can help you make better decisions when faced with such choices.

Not only can you limit the impact emotions have on your decisions with sell rules, but it is also easier to know what to do when you have concrete rules to follow. Once a stock is added to a portfolio, you continue to hold it until it meets one of your sell rules. The ultimate goal is to remove stocks when they no longer adhere to your strategy.

One Way to Set Your Sell Rules

Building sell rules doesn’t have to be tricky. A basic place to start is to model them on the initial considerations used in your stock purchasing strategy. In this context, a well-developed stock portfolio is constructed with three major steps: 1) determining a strategy that fits your investment needs, 2) developing a screen to find appropriate candidates for purchase and 3) creating sell rules for removing stocks when they no longer fit your strategy.

For the purpose of this discussion, a popular stock strategy from the AAII Stock Screens is used—the O’Shaughnessy Tiny Titans screen.

The strategy looks for micro-cap stocks (with market capitalizations between $25 million and $250 million). Additionally, these stocks must have price-to-sales (P/S) ratios below 1.0. In his book, “What Works on Wall Street,” James O’Shaughnessy found that a low price-to-sales ratio is a good way to identify “cheap” stocks and these lower ratios consistently produced higher returns. The screen filters the stock universe on these two factors and then ranks the results on their 52-week relative strength to the market and takes the top 25 stocks. Relative strength is a measure of momentum, with higher values indicating that a stock has been performing better than its peers.

To create sell rules for this strategy, you want to maintain the strategy and adhere to the criteria that allowed you to find the right stocks in the first place.

For example, since the strategy initially screens for stocks with price-to-sales ratios less than 1.0, a potential sell rule could be if the price-to-sales ratio exceeds 2.0. (This threshold is approximately the median price-to-sales ratio for all exchange-traded stocks in AAII’s Stock Investor Pro database.) Price relative to sales is a valuation metric; as it increases, the stock is likely to become overvalued. Valuation metrics are very useful for setting sell thresholds for value-based strategies. (They may not be appropriate as sell rules for other strategies such as pure growth.)

When setting the sell threshold, be careful not to make it too close to your purchase criteria (using, say, 1.25 in this case) or you will eliminate any room for the stock to appreciate in price.

Similarly, you could create a sell rule based on market cap. The strategy identifies micro-cap stocks with market caps up to $250 million. The AAII Model Shadow Stock Portfolio uses an upper threshold of $900 million as the dividing line between micro-cap and small-cap stocks. Once a stock reaches this size, it may no longer represent a Tiny Titan stock.

TABLE 1. Example Sell Rules Based on a Stock Screen

The AAII O’Shaughnessy Tiny Titans screen seeks micro-cap stocks trading at low price-to-sales (P/S) ratios. It then ranks those stocks based on their relative strength, favoring those with the strongest momentum. The example sell rules presented here are based on the inverse of those criteria. Stocks are eligible to sell when they no longer qualify as value or micro-cap stocks, or no longer exhibit strong relative strength (momentum).

Screening Criteria and Sell Rules

Another potential sell rule for this strategy is based on the relative strength required for purchase. With all momentum strategies, you want stocks that maintain their outperformance in comparison to the market. Though this screen ranks stocks meeting the valuation and market criteria based on their relative strength, you could use an absolute relative strength metric for determining when to sell. An A+ Investor Momentum Grade of D (weak) or F (very weak) is assigned when a stock’s weighted four-quarter relative price strength rank falls to 40 or 20, respectively.

Table 1 compares the initial screening criteria for the O’Shaughnessy Tiny Titans strategy to these possible threshold-based sell rules. This is just one example of how you might create sell rules based on a set of buy criteria; it is not necessarily the specific rules that O’Shaughnessy uses.

All AAII members have access to the criteria used for the passing companies list of each stock screen—see the Screening area of AAII.com (Figure 1). If you are using a particular screen to identify possible purchase candidates, you can use the initial criteria to construct sell rule thresholds that work for you.

All of the strategies used by AAII’s model portfolios—the Model Shadow Stock Portfolio, Dividend Investing, Growth Investing, Stock Superstars Report and VMQ Stocks—base their deletion rules on the criteria used for adding a stock, since it leads to a clearly defined process instead of relying on emotion or intuition. It also enforces following a disciplined, repeatable process.

FIGURE 1 AAII Stock Screens in Screening Area

All five AAII model portfolio strategies also use more than a single data point for deletion decisions, though meeting any deletion rule can prompt the removal of a stock. Each rule is well-defined to provide clarity on whether a change to the portfolio needs to occur. See the Model Portfolios area at AAII.com for a sample of each portfolio.

Keep in mind that there can be circumstances not covered by your initial set of sell rules that you will need to consider—for example, when a company you own receives an acquisition offer from another company. As these situations occur, add to your sell rules so you have guidelines to follow should something similar occur in the future.

Most importantly, keep in mind that the purpose of sell rules is to provide you with clarity about whether to sell or not. Without sell rules, an investment strategy has no direction, and you may find yourself struggling to make decisions in your portfolio.

Discussion

ROBERT A from NC posted over 3 years ago:

Do we have any objective research to prove that using such programmed sell rules results in higher returns for investors as opposed to using judgment and reasoning in the face of an ever-changing world? Or is this just something that "sounds good" because it's been bandied about as conventional wisdom for a long time? In the absence of objective research that leads me to a different conclusion, I prefer the rule that once I buy a stock, I hold it until either (1) I'm certain the company is going down the tubes or (2) I find something SUBSTANTIALLY better. Although I have no objective research to support my rule, 40+ years of experience have shown me that it PREVENTS me from selling good stocks, thereby allowing me to reap the ENORMOUS benefits of compounded growth over decades. And this strategy doesn't require one to be right all the time--or even most of the time. Just a few long-term winners can make one pretty wealthy.


JIMMIE S from GA posted over 3 years ago:

I am a long term wannabe. My only long term happened because i was busy working and didn't have much time to devote to stocks. I would like to know how you stayed in the market during all the ups and downs. Do you sometimes sell stocks so you have money to invest or do you add to your winners from another source of funds. Also. how many stocks do you hold long term at any given time. Thanks for any suggestions.


ROBERT A from NC posted over 3 years ago:

Jimmie, I don't know whether your questions are directed at me, but I'll answer them anyway. For my entire working life, the only stocks I sold were those that met the two-part rule I stated above. Then, when I retired, I sort of did a dumb thing. I sold off parts of good stocks in order to diversify for "safety." I paid a boatload of taxes in the process, and I used the proceeds to buy low-expense-ratio domestic equity index ETFs. My thought at the time was that I would just hold the ETFs forever, but after seeing my individual stocks outperform them in the following years, I concluded that I needed to start selling off my ETFs and buy individual stocks again. I think I can do better than the ETFs and maintain diversification by essentially making up my own, personal ETF(s). The only problem is that I don't want to eat another big tax bill, and I have so much gain built up in the ETFs that it will take years to sell them off in a tax-efficient manner (unless, God forbid, we see another crash like back in 1929-1932). Anyway, I now live on dividends and to a lesser extent, proceeds from the sales of ETFs. The ETF sales also fund my purchases of more stocks (which I will either hold for life or will sell according to my rule mentioned above). How did I stay in the market during ups and downs? I just did. I just hung on and rode them out. Even if the worst bear market imaginable came along now, I'd still hang on while selling only what I needed to get by. One benefit of selling in a down market is that you don't get hit with as big a tax bill, because your realized gains aren't as large a portion of what you pull out for living expenses. All this works because I spend way less than 4% of my net worth each year. How many stocks do I hold? Before I retired, more than 90% of my assets were in a half-dozen stocks. That wasn't by design; it just worked out that the few good companies I held for many years kept growing and growing. Now, about half of my net worth is in those same half-dozen stocks, and aside from the ETFs, I own stakes in about 70 other stocks, all of which are candidates to be lifelong holdings. I hope this adequately answers your questions. (You might be interested in reading my post on the AAII Community board for Asset Allocation entitled "Coffee Can Investing and Pareto's Principle.")


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: