Social Security and Medicare Can Raise Retirees' Tax Rates

Higher levels of income not only affect the taxation of Social Security benefits, but can also lead to higher Medicare premiums.

Article Highlights:

  • The taxation of Social Security benefits affects many lower- and middle-income households, while the income-based structure of Medicare premiums affects many higher-income households.
  • Rising levels of provisional income can lead to $0.50 or $0.85 of each dollar of Social Security benefits being taxed, which in turn causes the effective marginal tax rate to spike.
  • Since Medicare premiums increase at certain thresholds, a Roth IRA conversion could lead to higher Medicare premiums being paid two calendar years after the conversion is made.

As we mentioned in our previous article, “Retirement Planning Strategies Following the 2017 Tax Act” (March 2018 AAII Journal), Social Security benefits and Medicare premiums can alter the effective marginal tax rate paid.

In this article, we explain in greater detail how the taxation of Social Security benefits and income-based Medicare premiums can cause a retiree’s effective marginal tax rate (the tax rate on the next dollar of income adjusted for the impact of Social Security benefits and Medicare premiums) to substantially exceed his or her tax bracket. The rules affecting the taxation of Social Security benefits affect many lower- and middle-income households, while the rules affecting the size of Medicare premiums affect many higher-income households.

The Taxation of Social Security Benefits

Here is an example to demonstrate how Social Security benefits are taxed. George is single, receives $25,000 per year in Social Security benefits and will be at least 65 years old at the end of 2018. This would equate to a single person having a primary insurance amount (PIA) of $2,083.33 ($25,000 ÷ 12) who began their benefits at full retirement age (FRA). The PIA is the benefit paid at full retirement age. The taxable portion of Social Security benefits depends on his level of provisional income (PI). For almost all taxpayers, provisional income is the sum of everything in adjusted gross income (AGI)—which includes, but is not limited to wages, dividends, capital gains and losses, traditional IRA distributions, pension income and annuity income—from their tax return except for the taxable portion of Social Security benefits. Added to AGI is half of Social Security benefits plus tax-exempt interest. The sum of these numbers is provisional income.

Table 1 shows how the taxation of Social Security benefits causes a major hump—a sharp rise and then a sharp fall—in effective marginal tax rates based on the 2018 tax brackets. For most taxpayers, “Other Income” in Table 1 includes everything in AGI except the taxable portion of Social Security benefits plus tax-exempt interest. (The calculations become more complex if some of this other income consists of long-term capital gains or qualified dividends. For simplicity, we assume these amounts are zero, but the hump in the marginal tax rate curve would remain even if there are long-term capital gains or qualified dividends.)

For provisional income below $25,000, no Social Security benefits are taxed. For most singles, the taxable level of Social Security benefits increases by $0.50 for each dollar of provisional income between $25,000 and $34,000. For each dollar of provisional income above $34,000, an additional $0.85 of Social Security benefits is taxable. However, the maximum amount of Social Security benefits that are taxable is 85% of benefits received. For married couples, the same process applies, but the income thresholds are $32,000 and $44,000 instead of $25,000 and $34,000.

For George, the first $13,233 (rounded to the nearest dollar) of other income would be taxed at 0%. His provisional income would be $25,733 ($13,233 + half of his $25,000 in Social Security benefits). So, $367 of Social Security benefits would be included in taxable income, (($25,733 – $25,000) × 0.5). Thus, his AGI would be $13,600, ($13,233 + $367), which would be offset by his standard deduction of $13,600, ($12,000 + $1,600 for being over 65). Despite the last few dollars of other income causing some of his Social Security benefits to be included in AGI, his marginal tax rate is 0%. (IRS Publication 915 has worksheets for determining your taxable Social Security benefits.)

Table 1. Hump in Marginal Tax Rates Based on 2018 Tax Brackets

The effective marginal tax rate is the increase in taxes due for each additional dollar of other income earned within provisional income ranges. The effective marginal tax rate is the ordinary income tax bracket times the increase in taxable income. The math is ordinary income tax bracket × (1 + percentage of Social Security benefits taxed).
Other Income* Ordinary Income Tax Bracket (%) Increase in Taxable Income ($) Effective Marginal Tax Rate (%)
$0 to $13,233 0 1.50 0.0
$13,233 to $19,583 10 1.50 15.0
$19,583 to $21,500 12 1.50 18.0
$21,500 to $35,716 12 1.85 22.2
$35,716 to $41,206 22 1.85 40.7
$41,206 to $74,850 22 1.00 22.0
$74,850 to $149,850 24 1.00 24.0
*The other income ranges differ from the income levels shown in the 2018 ordinary income tax tables because of how Social Security benefits are taxed. See IRS Publication 915 for more information on the taxation of Social Security benefits.

For other income between $13,233 and $19,583, each dollar of income causes taxable income to rise by $1.50 ($1.00 of other income plus $0.50 of taxable Social Security benefits). For this other income range, George is in the 10% tax bracket, but 10% of $1.50 is $0.15, which represents a 15% effective marginal tax rate.

At other income of $19,583, George’s taxable income would be $9,525. So, his tax bracket would rise to 12%. Each dollar of other income between $19,583 and $21,500 results in an additional $0.50 of Social Security benefits to be taxed. Thus, each dollar of other income in this range causes taxable income to rise by $1.50. Since George is in the 12% tax bracket, his effective marginal tax rate is 18% (12% × 1.50).

At other income of $21,500, his provisional income is $34,000, [$21,500 + half of Social Security benefits]. So, additional income beyond this point causes an extra $0.85 of Social Security benefits to be taxed. Between $21,500 and $35,716 of other income, George’s tax bracket is 12%. Each additional dollar of other income between these income levels causes George’s taxable income to rise by $1.85, so his effective marginal tax rate is 22.2% [12% × 1.85].

At $35,716 of other income, George’s taxable income would be $38,700. So, his tax bracket would rise to 22%. Each dollar of other income between $35,716 and $41,206 results in an additional $0.85 of Social Security benefits to be taxed. Since George is in the 22% tax bracket, his effective marginal tax rate is 40.7% (22% × 1.85).

At other income of $41,206, 85% of George’s Social Security benefits are taxed, which is the maximum allowed. Any other income above this amount does not increase the taxable portion of his Social Security benefits and thus his effective marginal tax rate is the same as his tax bracket.

Notice that the taxation of Social Security benefits causes a sharp rise and sharp fall in effective marginal tax rates. In this example, for levels of other income between $13,233 and $41,206, George’s effective marginal tax rate is either 150% or 185% of his tax bracket. This hump in marginal tax rates is sometimes called the tax torpedo. Higher-income taxpayers usually have other income levels that are too high, especially after required minimum distributions (RMDs) begin, to avoid paying taxes on less than 85% of Social Security benefits. However, as we explain in the next section, these higher-income taxpayers should be concerned with how they withdraw funds from their savings in retirement because their withdrawal strategy can affect the future Medicare premiums they must pay.

Before leaving this section, it is important to note that if we return to the 2017 tax structure (adjusted for cost of living adjustments) as is scheduled to occur in 2026, many lower- and middle-income retirees will have much of their other income taxed at an effective marginal tax rate of 46.25%. Based on the 2017 tax structure, each dollar of other income within an income range $34,419 to $41,206 causes an additional $0.85 of Social Security to be taxed. Since the taxpayer would be in the lower end of the 25% tax bracket, federal taxes alone effectively increase by $0.4625 per each dollar of additional other income [25% of $1.85]. Thus, if we return to the 2017 tax structure, the tax torpedo will actually become worse for many lower- and middle-income taxpayers.

A Primer on Income-Based Medicare Premiums

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) instituted higher Medicare premiums for retirees as their income level increases. In general, Medicare premiums for one calendar year are based on modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) levels from two calendar years earlier. For Medicare premiums, MAGI is defined as adjusted gross income plus tax-exempt interest. Tables 2 and 3 show how Medicare premium levels increase as MAGI levels in 2016 breach income threshold levels.

Table 2. Medicare Premiums Levels Increase as MAGI Increases for Married Couples

This table shows how Medicare premiums increase as MAGI rises above certain thresholds for married couples filing joint returns. The standard monthly Part B premium for 2018 is $134 per person, or $268 for the couple. The standard Part D premium is determined by the cost of the plan chosen. The far-right column, labeled Additional Annual Premiums, denotes the additional amount a married couple taking Part B and D must pay with higher levels of income. For example, consider a married couple filing jointly taking Part B and D with a MAGI of $214,001 in 2016. Their 2018 joint annual premium would be $4,020 ([$267.80 + $67.20] times 12 months) higher than it would have been had their MAGI been $170,000 or less. Moreover, that last dollar of MAGI caused their 2018 annual premiums to rise by $2,424 ([($267.80 – $107.00 per month for Part B) + (67.20 – $26.00 per month for Part D)] times 12 months).
Married MAGI Part B Premium and Surcharge Part D Premium and Surcharge Additional Monthly Premiums Additional Annual Premiums
Less than $170,000 $268 Plan Premium (PP) na na
$170,000 to $214,000 $268 + $107.00 PP + $26.00 $133.00 $1,596.00
$214,000 to $267,000 $268 + $267.80 PP + $67.20 $335.00 $4,020.00
$267,000 to $320,000 $268 + $428.60 PP + $108.40 $537.00 $6,444.00
More than $320,000 $268 + $589.20 PP + $149.60 $738.80 $8,865.60


Table 3. Medicare Premiums Levels Increase as MAGI Increases for Single Filers

This table shows how Medicare premiums increase as MAGI rises above certain thresholds for a single person. The standard monthly Part B premium for 2018 is $134 per person. The standard Part D premium is determined by the cost of the plan chosen. The far-right column, labeled Additional Annual Premiums, denotes the additional amount the single person taking Part B and D must pay with higher levels of income. For example, consider a single person taking Part B and D who had a MAGI of $107,001 in 2016. This person’s 2018 annual premium would be $2,010 higher than it would have been had their MAGI been $85,000 or less. Moreover, that last dollar of MAGI caused the person’s 2018 annual premiums to rise by $1,212 ([($133.90 – $53.50 per month for Part B) + ($33.60 – $13 per month for Part D)] times 12 months).
Married MAGI Part B Premium and Surcharge Part D Premium and Surcharge Additional Monthly Premiums Additional Annual Premiums
Less than $85,000 $134 Plan Premium (PP) n/a n/a
$85,000 to $107,000 $134 + $53.50 PP + $13.00 $66.50 $798.00
$107,000 to $133,500 $134 + $133.90 PP + $33.60 $167.50 $2,010.00
$133,500 to $160,000 $134 + $214.30 PP + $54.20 $268.50 $3,222.00
More than $160,000 $134 + $294.60 PP + $74.80 $369.40 $4,432.80


The income threshold levels for MAGI in 2018 are $170,000, $214,000, $267,000 and $320,000 for married couples filing jointly. The respective threshold levels are 50% lower for single taxpayers. We explain how MAGI affects monthly Medicare premiums for couples, though the same logic applies to singles.

For MAGI of $170,000 or less, the standard premium for Part B and plan premium for Part D (drugs) apply. Everyone enrolled in Medicare must take Plan B, but Plan D is optional. If the MAGI level exceeds $170,000 by a single dollar, the monthly Part B premium increases by $53.50 for each spouse covered by Medicare, while the Part D premium, if applicable, increases by $13.00 per spouse per month. If both spouses are covered by Part B, but not Part D, their monthly premiums rise by $53.50 per spouse (or $1,284 annually for the couple). This is precisely like a $1,284 tax increase since they must pay this additional amount to the federal government or face penalties. For jumps in Medicare premiums at MAGI thresholds of $214,000, $267,000 and $320,000, their joint Part B annual increase is approximately $1,929. The joint annual Part B and D premium increase at these income thresholds is approximately $2,424. The annual premium increases for singles are half these amounts, but they still represent substantial increases in “taxes.”

[Due to these income-based rises in Medicare premiums, a taxpayer’s marginal tax rate can far exceed 100%. For example, a married couple’s final $100 withdrawal from their 401(k) in late 2018 could push their income above the $214,000 Medicare threshold. If so, their monthly Medicare premiums could rise by $101 per person, which is equivalent to a $2,424 rise in taxes for the couple on a full-year basis. If the couple pays $32 in income taxes on this last $100 withdrawal based on the 32% income tax bracket, then their effective marginal tax rate on the withdrawal would be ($32 + $2,424) ÷ $100 = 2,456% once the additional Medicare premium increase is factored in.]

The Effect of Roth IRA Conversions on Medicare Premiums

Consider John and Jan. Jan is retired and John expects to retire within the next two years. They will both be on Medicare by 2020. John’s 2018 income affects their 2020 premium levels. He can and should file Form SSA-44 with the Social Security Administration to note his specific life-changing event, which for him is his retirement and thus lower earned income. The Social Security Administration will adjust John’s 2018 income to reflect his work stoppage at retirement. Other life-changing events include divorce/annulment, death of a spouse, work reduction, loss of income-producing property due to a disaster, loss of pension income and situations where income for a year was due to a settlement with an employer for the employer’s bankruptcy or reorganization.

Suppose John converts $100,000 from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA to fully use the top of the 24% tax bracket. Since a Roth conversion is not a life-changing event, it would increase the couple’s MAGI for the current year, assuming the couple files a joint return. The conversion will potentially lower their MAGI in future years by reducing the size of John’s RMDs. If John were to make this Roth IRA conversion in, say, 2018, the couple should estimate how it would affect their 2020 Medicare premiums.

Suppose John and Jan only take Part B insurance and the $100,000 Roth conversion will cause their joint monthly premiums two years later to be $267.80 higher than if John does not make the Roth conversion. In this example, John and Jan should consider three amounts. First, they should consider the lower taxes on the current year’s Roth conversion (e.g., 24% compared to the tax rate they or their heirs would pay on the amounts held in the tax-deferred accounts that were not converted). If the couple would pay a 28% marginal tax rate on average for the $100,000 in question in future years instead of 24% if the Roth conversion is completed in, say, 2018, then their tax savings would be $4,000. Second, they should consider the additional Medicare premiums they would have to pay in two calendar years (e.g., 2020) from when John makes the Roth conversion (e.g., 2018). If they would jointly pay an additional $267.80 per month, then the additional annual cost two calendar years later would be $3,213.60. However, if they jointly had to pay an additional $107 per month for one year, then the additional cost would be $1,284. Third, they should consider the lower Medicare premiums they might pay for calendar years more than two years beyond conversion date (e.g., 2021 and beyond for a Roth IRA conversion made in 2018). For instance, if John makes the Roth conversion in 2018, his required minimum distributions will be smaller in subsequent years. These smaller RMDs could cause the couple’s Medicare premiums to also be lower in future years than if John does not make the Roth conversion.

Do the benefits of paying a lower marginal tax rate this year relative to future years and paying lower Medicare premiums starting three calendar years and beyond the conversion date exceed the additional Medicare premiums owed two calendar years beyond the conversion date?

Possibly. The actual answer requires running a scenario analysis with several assumptions being made, including future income, tax rates and Medicare premiums. Such analyses could be done with a spreadsheet, though many may find it easier work with an adviser or to use software such as we offer on our company’s website at www.socialsecuritysolutions.com.

Discussion

Dave Gilmer from WA posted over 8 years ago:

In the first place the title of this article struck me as somewhat odd. "Social Security can raise my tax rate"? I am not sure that is what the authors meant as SS can NEVER raise your tax rate any more than any other ordinary income. In fact since SS can at best be taxed at 85% of its gross amount, it is an income that is in fact preferable to ordinary income. While I understand the point the authors are trying to make I see no practical use for it. When you are in retirement what you need to know is how much tax you are going to need to pay on your gross income. In affect you need to parse out your income into the various tax brackets. So let me do that by applying some real world tax to a couple of the authors table rows. First let’s look at $19,583 of other income, for which the authors say the marginal tax rate is 15%. That is not really true. Below are the real results: $44,583 of spendable income has a $953 tax bill ($35,058 in the zero % bracket & $953 in the 10% bracket. Effective tax rate on the $44,583 is 2.1%. The retiree is getting a great break on taxes, so why does he care SS is taxed at a supposed 15% rate when his effective tax rate is 2.1%. Second let’s look at $41,206 of other income, which the authors claim produces a 40.7% marginal rate. In this case $66,206 of spendable income has a $6688 tax bill. Much more substantial because now 85% of the SS will be taxed, but once again let’s break it down: $17,350 in the 0% tax bracket, $953 tax from the 10% bracket, $3501 tax from the 12% bracket, and $2234 tax from the 22% bracket. Effective tax rate for this retiree is 10.1%. Could I have ever worked during my career and made $66,000 dollars and paid only 10% income tax on it. Not unless I put a chunk of it in a pre-tax account. Bottom line – Don’t get hung up on a negative viewpoint of how SS is taxed. Think of the positive aspect that it will never be taxed as much as your IRA withdrawals.


John Lambert from NJ posted over 8 years ago:

The title may be odd but this article contains valuable information. The message here is that you can avoid or reduce social security income taxes and the medicare income surcharges by converting some or all of your regular IRA to a Roth. The taxation of social security and medicare income surcharges need to be taken into account when making the IRA to Roth conversion decision. Bottom line: With good planning you can reduce the amount of taxes you pay.


Dave Gilmer from WA posted over 8 years ago:

John, One thing to remember is that your goal is not necessarily to reduce your taxes but to have more spendable money in retirement. What I did not see in this article is any attempt to address the long term affects of making a large Roth IRA conversion with your IRA money. Social Security taxes and Medicare surcharges are two completely separate issues. Retirees with low income and savings could be in the range of less than 85% of SS being taxed. High income retirees could be in the Medicare surcharge zone. These are basically the 1-2% of the population. It is either / OR for the above (one person can't have both problems) and they require different solutions. You don't do Roth conversions to keep yourself from having to pay tax on SS. That math just won't work out for most people as you will have less spendable income in retirement. Anything that pays tax at a higher rate on the front end of the Roth, as compared to your withdrawal rate in retirement will essentially reduce your retirement after-tax spendable income. Remember, in the case described where the SS was $25,000, the most tax ever paid on that for a single person over age 65 in 2018 is $765 - basically 3% of the SS payment. The math is such: 85% of the SS is $21,250 and it is what I would call the first tier income that can't be changed so when you apply the standard deduction of $13,600 to this income you are left with $7650 of taxable income taxed at 10% or $765 of tax. Does it make any sense to convert your IRA to Roth to save $765 of tax? Just what length is a person willing to go to in order to save $765 of tax? If you did go to those lengths by using a Roth conversion I can pretty much guarantee you that you would have less spendable money in retirement.


Wilbert Guilford from AZ posted over 8 years ago:

Even though I'm a CPA and CFP I am bewildered by all the calculations and assumptions. I'm kind of old school. Do you have a budget or spending plan? You should! Yes, consider whether an increase in Medicare premiums will break your budget or negatively impact your standard of living. And also consider what your values are: Are you trying to avoid paying taxes or are you trying to maintain your current standard of living? Can you do both? I guess I lean on the side of living comfortably and perhaps leaving a legacy to my loved ones. If I have to pay some taxes along the way but they do not conflict with those goals then I will pay the additional tax. If the Roth conversion helps me achieve those goals then do the Roth conversion. I lean more to maximizing my earnings and covering my expenses than I do on avoiding taxes. Focusing too much on avoiding taxes could cause me to lose sight of my other goals.


John Lambert from NJ posted over 8 years ago:

Dave I agree the goal is more spendable income in retirement and perhaps future benefits for your children. When you do a Roth conversion, both the potential medicare surcharges and social security taxation need to be considered along with the progressive federal and state tax rates. And maybe even other factors. In some States having no or little income other than Social Security (as the money you pull from a Roth would not count) might permit you to apply for low income assistance or property tax relief. I have a relative who has a goal of converting all his retirement money to Roth's just for this purpose. It all depends on your circumstances. Rather than be philosophical about taxes, I am using a spreadsheet and building a model to calculate the impact of Roth conversions and understand the trade offs. And I would advise everyone to do the same.


Kevin V from CA posted over 8 years ago:

While I derive some satisfaction over lowering my tax bill, it really can't be the only goal. It is like buying a house to get a tax deduction - is Wells Fargo more (or less) deserving of my money than Uncle Sam or Jerry? Any government payment will have some tax cliff implications. At the end of the day, it still matters more if what you have supports your standard of living than it does if what you spend minimizes your taxes.


Thomas T from NJ posted over 8 years ago:

I think what the author is getting at is the effect that Social Security (SS) benefits have on the next dollar, and thus marginal tax rate, of OTHER INCOME (non SS). What's actually happening is that for each additional $1 of Other Income (wages, dividends, capital gains, etc.), it's effectively adding potentially $1.50 or $1.85 (depending on which bracket you happen to be in) to taxable income. You can't do much to control SS benefits, other than to defer until age 70 1/2 if you don't need them (but even then you're just kicking the can down the road with respect to what this article is trying to point out), but you might be able to do something with respect to your OTHER INCOME. I agree that one's effective tax rate is probably a more meaningful figure, but it's often useful to be aware of what that "next dollar" of income is being taxed at. In the example of "George" above, if his OTHER INCOME is projected to be $35,716 for the year, and assuming he's retired, does he really want to enter the workforce again with the prospect that every $1 he earns will increase his federal tax bill $0.407? Perhaps, as there are social and mental benefits to working as well as economic. But if his motive is purely economic, this might change his mind.


Steven Sears from IA posted over 8 years ago:

One certain strategy to reduce taxes on retirement income is to die young.


William Dinner from NY posted over 8 years ago:

Though I worked on Wall Street for 35 years as a data scientist I can follow most convoluted mathematical scenarios. Yet this article is so lost in the menuchah that the focus of the authors is easily lost. Does one really care that one more dollar will really result in a 40% increase in taxable rate or it's called the "tax torpedo". Please give me a break. Were you paid for this article by the number of words you wrote? Yet there is substance buried away. The important aspect is how to manage your AGI, if you can, by taking out appropriate amounts from your retirement accounts. Another item that the authors fail to mention is the effect of state income taxes on the total bill. Many states provide an exclusion of taxes on all or some retirement funds. For instance, NY allows each individual to exclude the first $20,000 of retirement funds from their NYS income. $40,000 state income tax free, saving the about 7% in taxes, is not insignificant, even if it adds to ones AGI.


S Alexander from OH posted over 7 years ago:

I read this article in print, and am surprised to see how the comments here represent such confused thinking about basic investment and tax issues. This suggests that readers would benefit from a series of basic articles that could form a better foundation for thinking about these topics. This article addresses an important issue and deserves better reviews. There is some necessary complexity from the multiple factors that necessarily enter the tax calculations, and resulting simplification of the treatment. No reasonable length article can address all the specifics & cases. One problem I've found in using this information is that the Federal medicare "torpedo" tax trip-wire amounts vary by Medicare commission action making the calculation dependent on an unknown. For example the figure of $214k of joint income, which roughly doubles medicare premiums, was announced in mid-2017, and applies to 2018 premiums based on 2016 MAGI. An investor cannot(?) revise their 2016 MAGI after the tripwires are announced a year later! The Federal government could eliminate this sort of uncertainty and trip-wire penalty scheme easily, but since it apples to only ~6%-7% of filers - the reviled high-income lot - this seems unlikely.


RICHARD S from AZ posted over 5 years ago:

The Article needs updating The MAGI Income threshold in 2020 for married is $174,000 (based on 2 years prior tax return i.e 2018) and the threshold now increases each year with the rate of inflation. There are higher MAGI brackets from $218k and upwards where the premiums increase further.


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: