Related
Behavioral Finance
Simple tools such as journals, checklists and rules can both make you more disciplined and help you to spot and avoid mistakes.
Charles Rotblut leads a class in AAII's new Essential Investing Video Course. Go to https://www.aaii.com/ves for more information and to subscribe.
Article Highlights:
“As in driving, the secret to success is not making big mistakes.”
—Charles Ellis, “My Investment Letter: Words of Advice for My Grandchildren,” AAII Journal, October 2013.
I start most of my presentations with this quote from Ellis, who authored the best-selling book, “Winning the Loser’s Game” (McGraw-Hill Education, 7th Edition, 2017).
The quote focuses on the biggest key to successful investing: not screwing up. As long as a person avoids making the big mistakes, they will have returns far in excess of the average investor.
The biggest mistakes are typically due to behavior. Investors allow a combination of emotions and mental shortcuts (heuristics) to significantly influence the decisions they make and the actions they take. Any step taken to interrupt the System 1 (quick and intuitive) mode of thought we humans often operate in can be beneficial. I believe the written word is a powerful tool for disengaging from System 1.
This article discusses common biases and behavioral mistakes along with pragmatic solutions based on using the power of the written word to your advantage. In some cases, there is more than one solution. As you read through the article, realize there is no one universal set of solutions that will work for every person. Use the suggestions as a starting to point to create a customized approach based on what you think will work best for you.
The human mind evolved to cope with a very different environment than what we currently face when engaging with the financial markets. The first financial bubble in recorded history—the tulip mania—started in 1636. The earliest settlements in Mesopotamia date back to approximately 10,000 B.C. according to History.com. Our ancestors’ survival depended on the ability to think and react quickly. If there was a rustling in the savannah, early humans had to quickly assess whether it was a dangerous predator or something harmless. It was better to flee first and ask questions later than it was to analyze the situation and then react accordingly. Pausing to think things through could get a person killed.
This survival-based reactionary thinking resulted in modern humans having two types of processes guiding cognitive reactions: System 1 and System 2. System 1 is intuitive thinking; it relies on heuristics (mental shortcuts) to form quick assessments and guide our initial reactions. System 2 is reflective, deliberate and slower. It uses up more energy and requires more effort. As such, most of the time, humans act on the decisions made by System 1. Meanwhile, much of System 2 thinking is spent creating rationales supporting those actions called for by System 1. Put another way, we’re programmed to act first and think second.
One way to interrupt the tendency to act upon snap decisions is to create and use a checklist. A checklist will slow you down and make you think through the decision process. It will force you to work through a specified set of steps before action can be taken. Designed correctly, a checklist will bring forth the objective information needed to make a decision.
What should be on a checklist? It should prompt you to do whatever is necessary to make an informed and well-thought-out decision. An investment checklist could include prompts to look at valuation metrics, financial statement ratios, revenue and earnings growth, credit quality, performance, allocation relative to your overall portfolio (position size) and/or known risks specific to the investment. Whatever you think is important to consider when analyzing an investment should go on your checklist.
However, merely creating a checklist is not enough. You must use it consistently and regularly. The more you do, the more it will become part of your routine and the less reliant you will be on snap judgments.
Another advantage of checklists is their ability to get you to focus on the process. Across fields, good processes improve the odds of achieving the best possible outcome. Another reason for focusing on the process and not the outcome is that humans, in aggregate, are bad when it comes to self-assessment.
One oft-cited study about self-assessment found that 80% of people rated their own driving abilities as being above average (“Comparative Perceptions of Driver Ability—A Confirmation and Expansion,” by Iain McCormick, Frank Walkey and Dianne Green; Accident Analysis & Prevention, June 1986). It’s not unreasonable to assume that most people would take issue with a statistic designating four out of five other drivers as having above-average driving skills.
Clifford Asness, the head of hedge fund company AQR Capital Management, has pointed out in conferences that if most investors are above average, then a small group must really be awful. His statement is based on simple math: If the overwhelming majority of the data points are higher than average, then a small subset has to be low enough to bring the average down below that of the majority.
What happens in driving, investing and other activities is that less skilled people tend not to recognize their weaknesses, while skilled people tend to underestimate their abilities. At the same time, we’re bad at attributing outcomes. This leads to behavioral errors, as Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman explained in the July 2012 AAII Journal (“Behavioral Errors Hurt Your Returns”): “In a rising market, individual investors tend to feel that they’re geniuses because the results are good. They blame the market when things collapse, but they take credit when things go well. This bias tends to make them overconfident and hyperactive.”
Objective feedback on your process will shed light on how you are actually doing. Compare your performance against the returns of appropriate benchmarks, taking a long-term view. Returns over a few weeks or a few months can be above or below that of the relevant benchmarks for reasons other than skill or lack thereof.
In addition, conduct a postmortem when selling an investment. Think about what part of your process worked right, what part of your process you didn’t follow and what you could have done differently based on the information known or that should have been known at a past point in time.
Some people find it helpful to keep a mistake book. As the name implies, this is a journal of past mistakes. It is intended to highlight errors so that they won’t be made again. As you identify the errors made, adjust your checklist or set of buy and sell rules to prevent the same errors from recurring.
Taking things a step further, combine a trading journal (a diary of the decisions you are making and the rationale for them) with postmortem analysis and a mistake book. The three will give you documented information about your process. This will allow you to discuss your process with someone you trust who is in a position to give you objective feedback, such as a financial planner or adviser.
If you haven’t previously documented your investing decisions, your brokerage statements can shed light on how you’ve reacted in the past. Pay particular attention to past periods of downward volatility, such as previous corrections and bear markets.
The reason why is that recency bias and availability bias collide with loss aversion to create harmful outcomes for many investors. This can be seen in the 10-year annualized investor returns for the Vanguard 500 Index fund
(VFINX). Morningstar calculates shareholders of this fund realizing a 5.06% annualized return for the 10-year period ended April 30, 2018. This compares to an 8.89% annualized return for the fund itself.
This 3.83 percentage-point difference is known as the return gap or behavior gap. It is the difference in returns that investors actually realize from their buy and sell decisions. In the case of the Vanguard 500 Index fund, had the average shareholder in the fund simply held onto their shares for the full 10-year period, they would have realized the same return as the fund itself (and very close to that of the S&P 500 index). Rather, by allowing their emotions to take over, they forfeited a large amount of wealth.
The gap occurred during the 2007–2009 financial crisis and the period afterward. The period’s negative headlines were front and center in investors’ minds and easy to access by System 1 thinking (availability bias). At the same time, investors were expecting the then-bear market to last for a prolonged period of time (recency bias). The falling markets created emotional discomfort, prompting a desire by System 1 to sell in order to limit the pain and avoid any further declines in portfolio value (loss aversion). It was a classic behavioral response to do what felt good at the time without considering the potential long-term implications.
If you’ve previously sold during down markets or otherwise stayed away from riskier investments out of concern about what could happen to your portfolio, think about what triggered your decisions at the time. Was it a certain decline in portfolio value? Was it the headlines? Was it fear about not achieving a financial goal? Whatever the reason(s), write it (them) down. Doing so will give you a starting point for developing a plan to handle similar situations in the future.
Then start developing systems to alter what you do when such triggers re-emerge. One example would be a simple ritual of getting up, walking to a different room, breathing slowly 10 times before taking any investment action. As silly as this may seem, it interrupts the flow of System 1 thinking. A study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found “that when people already have a goal that matters to them … rituals may enhance self-discipline to improve self-control,” (Allen Ding Tian, Juliana Schroeder, Gerald Häubl, Jane L. Risen, Michael Norton and Francesca Gino, 2018).
A ritual could include reviewing notes you’ve written in advance about how to react to such situations. These are guidelines you write while in a calm state about what to do during the periods when you are worried. Because they are your notes, you may be more likely to follow them—especially if you put thought into them.
What should these notes include? It depends on what triggers you to act and what prompts you not to act.
Some investors may simply need a reminder of what is normal and what is rare. For example, corrections and bear markets are not unusual. Between 1945 and 2016, 21 corrections and 12 bear markets occurred, according to Sam Stovall, the chief equity strategist for CFRA Research. While these drops have resulted in average declines of 14% and 33%, the S&P 500 fully recovered its losses within four months following the bottom of a correction and within about two years (25 months) following a bear market’s trough on average (“Stock Market Retreats and Recoveries,” AAII Journal, October 2017). Having this data written down in an accessible spot can provide much needed perspective.
Other investors may need a reminder of how their portfolio is structured, along with the safeguards built into it. Cash and cash-equivalent savings of six to 12 months’ worth of living expenses is suggested for workers; an amount equal to two to four years of living expenses are suggested for retirees. Being reminded of these buffers may reduce the urge to pull out of the market.
You could also write down the various financial goals you hope to achieve and how you’ve oriented your portfolio to achieve them. This is a version of the bucket strategy, which splits a portfolio’s allocation based on the timing of when the money will be needed. For each goal, list the rationale for your allocation to it and why you are willing to tolerate X% of downside volatility to achieve the goal. This may ground your emotions by reminding you of your well-thought-out plan.
Another alternative is to establish a system for channeling your emotions. If you expect that the urge to act is going to be strong once your emotions are triggered, write down instructions for how to act. Perhaps you allow yourself to sell a small percentage of your stock holdings—say, 5%, for every 10% drop in the S&P 500. Is this ideal from a long-term investing standpoint? No. Is it better than selling a much larger stake of your portfolio out of panic because you didn’t have this safety valve? Yes.
An even better strategy is to have a system that is designed to prompt you to buy when prices fall. Stovall has found that allocating money to stocks every time the S&P 500 falls by a 7% increment has historically been a profitable strategy. Alternatively, you could use rebalancing. Rebalancing means adjusting your allocations back to target when the major asset classes in your portfolio have strayed too far off target (e.g., by five or 10 percentage points). Write instructions to do this or have a checklist created for this purpose.
In all cases, the power of the written word comes into play by reminding you of what you need to do. Without written guidelines, you may forget the pact you made with yourself—especially when you are in an emotional state. None of this has to be in long prose; in fact, it’s better if it is written in bullet-point format. Even an “I’m Nervous” checklist can do wonders for limiting the impact that your emotions will have.
The return gap is emblematic of a bigger challenge many investors face: knowing when to sell. A preset list of rules to follow makes the process of deciding when to sell more disciplined and reduces the uncertainty associated with it.
At the most basic level, your sell rules should be the opposite of your buy rules. Value investors should sell when an asset’s valuation becomes high. Growth investors should sell when revenues or earnings stop rising. Dividend investors should sell when the quarterly payments are cut or when the yield falls to too low of a level.
The precise reasons for selling will depend on your strategy. Stock investors can include maximum limits for the valuation ratios (e.g., the price-earnings ratio, the price-to-book-value ratio, yield etc.); a decline or elimination of revenue, earnings or dividend growth; a loss of profitability; or a deterioration in a price momentum-based metric in their sell rules. Bond investors can act on deteriorations in the issuer’s underlying fundamental strength and ability to pay. Fund investors may act on changes in a fund’s objective, underperformance relative to a fund’s peers, a change in the manager or a significant increase in turnover. These are not comprehensive suggestions, but they should give you an idea of the types of things to build sell rules around.
Whatever rules you decide on, write them down before the decision to sell needs to be made.
Written sell rules are effective for two reasons. First, they provide much needed clarity about when to sell and when to hold. Secondly, they counteract the endowment effect. The endowment effect is the premium value we assign to something we own. It can cause us to succumb to other behavioral errors, including confirmation bias (only paying attention to information that supports our decision to own an investment and downplaying information that is counter to our opinions). Your sell rules counteract the endowment effect by reframing how you view the investment. The rules lead you to evaluate the investment based on the criteria you’ve specified.
Journals, checklists, guidelines and rules only work if you refer back to them regularly. It does little good to keep notes, establish rules and create checklists if you never look at them. On the other hand, the more you use these tools, the more they will become part of your investing routine. A well-thought-out checklist, for instance, can become so effective that you may find not relying on it is more time-consuming than using it is.
When starting the process of using the power of the written word, don’t try to get things perfect. Your strategy and knowledge will evolve over time; as should your rules, guidelines, systems and checklists.
If you find yourself making new mistakes or falling for the same behavioral mistakes, keep adjusting your approach as necessary. Over time, you’ll find that the incremental changes you make will end up having a big positive impact.
Behavioral Finance
Beginning Investor
Stock Strategies
Shuman from Maine posted over 7 years ago:
You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Log InCreate an account