Close

A Primer on Insurance Products

by Peter Katt

This column provides practical commentary on insurance products, issues and planning that I frequently encounter. I hope you can use it as a quick check to see whether the insurance or proposals you encounter make sense.

Long-Term Care Insurance

Long-term care insurance is a risk management asset designed to protect against the costs of needing care during old age. However, these policies do not cover medical or critical care situations. Long-term care workers assist insureds with the difficulties of daily living activities. Many plans pay a stipend, so it doesn’t matter whether the care is received in an institutional or home setting.

...To continue reading this article you must be registered with AAII.

Gain exclusive access to this article and all of the member benefits and investment education AAII offers.
JOIN TODAY for just $29.
Log in
Already registered with AAII? Login to read the rest of this article.

Register for FREE
to read this article and receive access to future AAII.com articles.
  
Peter Katt CFP, LIC, is sole proprietor of Katt & Co., a fee-only life insurance advising firm located in Kalamazoo, Michigan (269/372-3497); www.peterkatt.com.


Discussion

Thomas Herron from California posted about 1 year ago:

Katt is great. Run him more often. TH


David Simmons from North Carolina posted about 1 year ago:

I would like comments on a reasonably new product called indexed annuities. The annuity is held for a fixed period, one is guaranteed to not lose principal, you will earn approx. 3 to 4%/yr(depending on the index), the money is held for 10 yrs and there is a penalty for early withdrawal.


Alan Thelen from Michigan posted about 1 year ago:

Ditto to David Simmons comment. I also would like to hear Mr. Katt's take on "Hybrid" Indexed Annuities. I have looked at a couple which seem to have merit for at least a portion of one's retirement savings. However, its hard to know what you don't know.... if you know what I mean. :)


Craig Wilkey from Virginia posted about 1 year ago:

Are you saying that the "risk needle" is higher for guaranteed universal life products because of a greater risk of carrier insolvency or because these products have lower cash values? Term products also have no cash value. Carriers generally offer an array of products of which guaranteed products are but one type. If a carrier were to go into receivorship, wouldn't it impact all the policyholders of that company (both guaranteed and non-guaranteed alike)? I would think that policyholders with guaranteed contracts would fair better in receivorship than those with non-guaranteed elements. Has there been any real experience with this?


J Altenburg from New Jersey posted about 1 year ago:

Disability insurance - why would it be key to forego the tax deduction? Wouldn't a person be in a much higher tax bracket prior to the disability? The chances of being disabled for most people is relatively small. Why not take the tax break now rather than pay tax now and probably never recover it? In addition, the disability will likely entail deductible out of pocket medical related costs and home care, so the tax burden will be far less than pre-disability.


M Pierce from Nebraska posted about 1 year ago:

Another helpful article on insurance would be to cover the topics of 1)modified endowment contracts and 2) Whole Life policies with adjustable term protection.


Gerald Bauer from Ohio posted about 1 year ago:

I like whole life insurance. I have several policies performing very well.


Tristan Argenti from Arkansas posted about 1 year ago:

Katt gives a categorical imperative in his last two paragraphs concerning life settlements; he is just plain dead set against them. Too bad he doesn't advance the slightest reason for his prejudice other than claiming his clients find them "quite distasteful". He apparently doesn't realize that making money is sometimes exactly that but enterprising individuals do it any way they can.


George Ross from Virginia posted about 1 year ago:

I have an variable annuuity balance that has a significant untaxed gain and I don't plan on annuitizing the balance. Are there any alternatives to minimize the tax effects of my variable annuity.


John K from Kansas posted about 1 year ago:

George-

Have you looked at a 1035 exchange? You can transfer the balance of your annuity to another annuity or life insurance contract. One option is single premium whole life, if you don't have any need for the cash value immediately. If you would like to use the cash value, a 7 pay policy with a lump-sum premium may be an option. Check with lawyer, accountant, etc of course.


John K from Kansas posted about 1 year ago:

*correction
Annuities can't be exchanged for life insurance, only new annuities or long term care.


G Muren from Connecticut posted about 1 year ago:

In discussions of the tax consequences of annuities I wonder if the simplified method of computing the tax listed in the IRS brocure is used by those concerned. It seems to reduce the taxabe portion quite a bit.


Paul Campanella from Virginia posted about 1 year ago:

I would like to see a current analysis of what is happening in the area of Long Term Care. Lots of changes have occurred since you last discussed this area of insurance in any detail.


Mike R from Michigan posted 11 months ago:

Dear Mr. Katt, I was wondering if you had any information regarding Indexed Universal Life Insurance contract's. North America's "Rapid Builder" or Minnesota Life's "Eclipse" products. From the information that I have read,the above contract's appear intriguing. Because of their features, ie: indexing, minimum death benefit, tax free retirement income,& transfer of wealth, are these product's a prudent retirement vehicle? Thank-You for your time, Mike


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In