Figuring Taxes on Social Security Benefits
by Julian Block
Americans often dream about a simplification of the Byzantine Internal Revenue Code, only to awaken and find the tax laws becoming more complicated.
The rules for Social Security benefits are especially convoluted and confusing. Although most Social Security recipients escape income taxes completely on all of their benefits, middle- and upper-income level retirees have to count up to 85% of their benefits as reportable income.
In this article
- Gift of the MAGI
- Considerations for Couples Who File Separately
- Further Rules
- The Effect of Ignoring Inflation
Share this article
Facebook
Twitter
E-mail
SeekingAlpha
Stumbleupon
Delicious
LinkedIn
Gift of the MAGI
Taxes are triggered for Social Security recipients when their MAGI exceeds specified amounts. MAGI is an acronym for modified adjusted gross income, which in most instances is essentially the same amount as adjusted gross income.
To calculate whether MAGI surpasses the tax-triggering thresholds, retirees must consider income from various sources such as: salaries, pensions, dividends, capital gains, rents, Roth conversions (money moved out of traditional IRAs and into Roth accounts), and required minimum distributions RMDs starting at age 70½ from traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, and other retirement plans.
To read more, please become an AAII Registered User or CLICK HERE.
Discussion
This is an eye opener! But since when did "tax-exempt" income become taxable!
posted about 1 year ago by Martin from Georgia
Martin, is tax exempt interest income taxable or just used in calculating taxation of SS Benefits?
posted about 1 year ago by Richard from Georgia
I understand that MRD from IRA's are taxable, but how do they justify claiming it is additional income. It amounts to a transfer from one account to another. You have no more after the distribution than you had before.
posted about 1 year ago by Mark from Ohio
Do dividends earned by investments in a Roth IRA account get figured into MAGI?
posted about 1 year ago by Robert from Virginia
a huge penalty for being married. Everyone of you should be letting your senators and congressman know that married couples should receive twice the single persons 25,000. $50,000 whould be a lot fairer than $32,000. Talk to your church as the IRS is telling you to get divorced. Just so you know capital gains are not surposed to be taxed if you are in the 15% brackett. Guess again they are included in MAGI and make more of your social security taxable.
posted about 1 year ago by Dick from Vermont
I will use distributions from my traditional IRA to supplement Social Security income every other year. That way, I am taxed on social security only every other year. I would like to maximize those withdrawls because I believe that IRA's will be taxed in the future, contrary to the advice of "professionals". Already, the Michigan governor is planning to eliminate the state tax breaks for IRA's.
posted about 1 year ago by Fred from Michigan
get rid of the marriage penalty & the politicians who dont correct this dilemma.
posted about 1 year ago by Ronald from New Jersey
Did I miss this something? If one takes Social Security benefits at full retirement age then there is no limit to how much one can earn, and therefore no theshold amount for a taxable liability. Is this not true?
posted about 1 year ago by David from Texas
Mr. Bock has written an excellent article. It is this kind of information that makes membership in AAII so useful. Dick from Vermont cites the negative aspect of recognizing long term capital gains, i.e., it is included in the MAGI, but for those lucky enough to be in the 10 percent or 15 percent tax bracket and who have unrealized long term capital gains in taxable accounts, no Federal income tax is due on these gains if realized in 2011 or 2012. These gains can be lawfully excluded from taxable income thus potentially resulting in negative net taxable income i.e., no tax due. I plan to harvest these gains to the extent I can and still keep taxable income within the 15 percent bracket. The realized long term gains and qualified dividends, when subtracted from taxable income, potentially can result in a negative taxable income, i.e. no tax due. The realized gains can be held as cash to cover future needs with little or no future tax due or re-invested. Future taxes on new gains (or dividends) will probably be unavoidable but at least the tax will be less than doing nothing during the two tax years cited.
posted about 1 year ago by Thomas from Texas
Why should married couples get twice the deduction. We still pay the same utility and housing costs as married couples. Stop the discrimination against us. You will someday be in our shoes.
posted 3 months ago by Marion from Missouri
There is an addition issue to consider than Social Security. MAGI is also use to determine Medicare premiums. If MAGI for a married couple is between $170,000 and $214,000, then Medicare premiums increase $40 per month and Part D premiums increase $11.60. If MAGI is higher, then the premium increase is greater. This should be considered by many people when calculating a Roth Conversion.
posted 3 months ago by Terry from Arizona
The killer is the atrocious marginal tax rate that goes on as one say withdraws more and more taxable IRA as you step through the beginning of the taxing of SS until you get to taxing 85% of SS. The initial marginal tax rate starts at 15%, then moves to 27.75% then just before you get to the 85% of SS the marginal rate jumps to 48%, then after hitting the max taxable 85%, the marginal tax rate moves to 26%. This calculation was performed using TAXACT software. Interesting how the average pensioner with forced RMD can easily fall into the high marginal tax rate. At the worst point almost half of every dollar you withdraw goes for taxes. The guys that wrote that law knew exactly how to stick it to us.
posted 2 months ago by Norman from Washington
