How I Find Lower Risk/Higher Reward Stocks
by Charles Rotblut, CFA
There are four key attributes I look for in a stock: an attractive valuation, good financials, a strong business model and the ability to add diversification to my portfolio.
These traits are based on some of the great investment literature that has been written over the past 100 years. For example, Benjamin Graham and David Dodd emphasized the importance of book value in “Security Analysis” (1934). Philip Fisher stressed the importance of a good business model in “Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits” (1958). And Harry Markowitz revolutionized portfolio management by showing that diversification can increase returns and lower risk at the same time.
In this article
Share this article
When you combine attractive valuations, strong financials, a good business model and the ability to add diversification, the result is a good risk-reward ratio for a stock.
What is the risk-reward ratio? It is a measure of the probability a stock will decrease in price (“risk”) versus the probability that a stock will increase in price (“reward”). The lower the amount of risk and the greater the potential for reward, the higher the probability that the stock will turn into a profitable investment.
To measure a stock’s risk-reward ratio, I developed a scorecard for my new book, “Better Good Than Lucky” (W&A Publishing and Traders Press Inc., 2010), based on these four key attributes. Since investing is messy as opposed to an exact science, I assigned a range of scores for each criterion instead of requiring that a stock meet specific characteristics. It is extremely difficult to find the perfect stock, but there are many stocks that are capable of helping you build wealth. Therefore, the goal is to find stocks whose potential rewards outweigh their potential risks.
To read more, please become an AAII Registered User or CLICK HERE.
Discussion
In Table 1, for the current ratio, the best score is given to a current ratio above 1.0 and below 2.0. Why isn't the best score for a current ratio above 2.0? Is this a typo, or am I missing something?
posted over 2 years ago by RD Walker from Alabama
R,
A current ratio above 2.0 requires additional investigation.
For example, a high current ratio can be a warning flag that a company has slowed payment of receivables (meaning its bills) or that inventory levels are rising. The current ratio can also be elevated by a high level of cash, which is a double-edged sword. A large amount of cash does provide flexibility, but if management uses the cash balance to engage in projects or mergers that adversely impact profitability, then shareholders will be harmed.
-Charles
posted over 2 years ago by Charles Rotblut from Illinois
I wonder what the author's return has been using this approach?
posted over 2 years ago by CSarahan from District of Columbia
This screen is interesting and I look forward to analyzing it further. However, it is good only in a context of top-down analysis of the market, it's sectors and it's industries. In order to reduce risk it is very important to know where investment money is flowing. A financially sound company is going down with the rest of the ships if investment money is moving out of company's industry or sector. It will just sink more slowly. Conversely, if money is flowing into it's industry it will rise more quickly than less sound compan ies.
posted over 2 years ago by James from New Jersey
Can you make available the code for the stock investor professional?
posted over 2 years ago by Rein from Massachusetts
