Spending Bills Affect Inherited IRAs and Medical Deductions
by Charles Rotblut | December 19, 2019
There is nothing the U.S. Congress seems to like more than must-pass legislation. The year-end spending bills passed this week are no exception. They contain a grab bag of amendments tucked in by various legislators. Among them are the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act and a reduction in the floor for deducting medical expenses. The bills had yet to be signed as of this morning, but President Trump is expected to do so according to news reports.
I’ll start with the medical deductions, because it’s quicker to explain than the SECURE Act, which effectively ends the ability to stretch IRAs over an extended period of time. Under existing law, qualified medical deductions cannot be deducted unless they exceed 10.0% of adjusted gross income. This floor has been lowered to 7.5% for “taxable years beginning before January 1, 2021.”
The floor for this year had been 10%. If you didn’t think you would reach this level and were intending to postpone realizing certain medical expenses until 2020, you may want to quickly rerun your numbers. With the lower threshold, it may make sense to realize those expenses by December 31 of this year. Qualified expenses include hearing aids (including batteries and maintenance), eyeglasses, contact lenses and even bandages. Mileage for medical treatment is also deductible. See IRS Publication 502 for the full list of qualified expenses.
Now onto the SECURE Act. This legislation had been stalled in the Senate for several months even though it had bipartisan support. It contains many positives but will throw a wrench into the estate plans for some of you by shortening the time withdrawals must be taken from inherited IRAs by most (but not all) non-spousal beneficiaries.
Non-spousal beneficiaries must withdraw the assets held in an inherited IRA within 10 years. Exceptions will exist for those who are minors, disabled, chronically ill or not more than 10 years younger than the deceased owner of the retirement account. These new rules apply to retirement accounts where the owner has died after December 31, 2019.
Previously, IRAs could be stretched by bequeathing the account to a younger relative. The inheritor would then stretch out withdrawals over their lifetime. Doing so extended the period of time the assets held in the account were not subject to taxation beyond mandatory withdrawals. The SECURE Act effectively ends this practice. While troublesome for estate planning, the U.S. Supreme Court did previously issue an opinion specifically describing inherited IRAs as not being retirement accounts.
I would suggest that those of you who could be affected by this change speak to your estate attorney, including those who have a trust listed as the IRA’s beneficiary. If you’re interested in reading more about the potential impact of the legislation on inherited IRAs, I suggest Jamie Hopkins’ commentary on Forbes.com and Jeff Levine’s thread on Twitter. (You don’t need to have an account on Twitter to access it. Be sure to scroll down after the first tweet, as Levine wrote 34 posts about the SECURE Act.)
The SECURE Act does contain several positives. Part-time workers will be allowed to participate in 401(k) and similar employer-sponsored retirement plans. The age limit for making contributions to a traditional IRA has been repealed. It is currently age 70; after December 31, 2019, there will be no age limitation. You will still need earned income, however. The age when required minimum distributions (RMDs) must start will be raised from 70½ to 72. This change in age will “apply to distributions required to be made after December 31, 2019, with respect to individuals who attain age 70½ after such date.” Notably, qualified charitable distributions (QCDs) will continue to be allowed once a person turns age 70½; the minimum age is not being raised.
After the legislation is signed into law, we’ll add an addendum to our tax guide. We’ll also update the mileage deductions for 2020 once the IRS releases them.
-
Inherited IRA Rules for Spouses, Heirs and Trusts – Written in 2017, this article explains the rules as they currently exist. The SECURE Act’s big change will be, as noted above, to require most non-spousal withdrawals to be taken within 10 years.
-
Health Savings Accounts – Dollars contributed to these accounts are tax deductible, and when spent on qualified medical expenses they can also be withdrawn tax-free—a double bonus.
Optimism among individual investors about the short-term direction of the stock market is at its highest level of the year. The latest AAII Sentiment Survey also shows an unusually low level of pessimism and a small decline in neutral sentiment.
Bullish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will rise over the next six months, jumped 6.5 percentage points to 44.1%. Optimism was last higher on October 3, 2018 (45.7%). Bullish sentiment is above its historical average of 38.0% for just the 11th time this year.
Neutral sentiment, expectations that stock prices will stay essentially unchanged over the next six months, is 0.9 percentage points lower at 35.4%. Even with the decrease, neutral sentiment remains above its historical average of 31.5% for the 30th time in 31 weeks.
Bearish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will fall over the next six months, plunged 5.6 percentage points to 20.5%. Pessimism was last lower on April 24, 2019 (20.2%). Bearish sentiment is below its historical average of 30.5% for the ninth consecutive week.
At its current level, pessimism is unusually low. Historically, the S&P 500 has gone on to realize below-average, though still positive, returns over the six- and 12-month periods following such readings. Both bullish sentiment and neutral sentiment are within their typical historical ranges.
The trade war has long been an issue affecting individual investors’ outlook for the stock market. The recent trade agreement between the U.S. and China combined with the recent highs in the stock market may have combined to boost optimism among AAII members. (For the survey period starting today, we’re asking respondents specifically about what impact the trade agreement is having on their sentiment toward stocks.) Also influencing individual investors’ market outlook is Washington politics, earnings growth, the economy and valuations.
This week’s special question asked AAII members what they thought about Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell having a higher threshold for raising interest rates than for cutting them. Nearly half (48%) of the respondents believe that the chairman’s actions are appropriate given global market conditions. On the other hand, 30% of respondents disagree with Powell. Many in this group cite inflation concerns and/or believe that rates are inappropriately low given the current U.S. economy. A small group of respondents (13%) believe Powell is caving to political pressure.
Here is a sampling of the responses:
- “It suits market expectations, so it’s good for the markets. But I think the Fed should gradually raise rates to have room for lowering in recession scenarios.”
- “I have no idea about Powell’s threshold for changing rates. I’m in favor of just letting the economy alone. Let it move under its own power.”
- “It makes sense when the U.S. already has the highest short-term rates of the world’s advanced economies.”
- “He’s influenced by the politics around him. Which, in the Oval Office and elsewhere, favor incurring low-cost debt to finance ventures and pumped economic indicators.”

Bullish: 44.1%, up 6.5 points
Neutral: 35.4%, down 0.9 points
Bearish: 20.5%, down 5.6 points
Bullish: 38.5%
Neutral: 31.0%
Bearish: 30.5%
December 12, 2019 The Bond Market Armageddon That Didn’t Happen
December 5, 2019 The Biggest Winners May Not Be the Stocks You Expect
November 28, 2019 Reasons for Individual Investors to Be Grateful
November 21, 2019 What the Proposed Change in RMDs Means for Investors
Discussion
Cliff B. from NY posted over 6 years ago:
Will 457 Deferred Compensation plans be treated the same way as IRA's by the SECURE act ? Thank You for keeping AAII subscribers up to date !
Charles Rotblut from IL posted over 6 years ago:
The law applies to qualified plans. So, if the plan allows for tax-differed retirement savings, the 10-year limit should apply. We’re waiting for the IRS to issue new regulations based on the new law. -Charles
You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account
