Sequence Risk: Is It Really a Big Deal?

Sequence risk refers to the chance of running out of money in retirement due to a period of bad returns. While it can occur, Javier Estrada of Spain’s IESE Business School argues that sequence risk is commonly over-exaggerated, leading retirees to pursue overly conservative asset allocation strategies or reduce their standard of living.

Sequence risk refers to the chance of running out of money in retirement due to a period of bad returns. While it can occur, Javier Estrada of Spain’s IESE Business School argues that sequence risk is commonly over-exaggerated, leading retirees to pursue overly conservative asset allocation strategies or reduce their standard of living.

He defined the risk as “A sequence of low (typically large and negative) returns, early in (typically in the first half of) the retirement period, that leads to portfolio failure unless the withdrawal strategy is reconsidered (typically implying a substantial decrease in withdrawals).” To determine how significant this risk is, Estrada used S&P 500 index annual returns for 30-year retirement periods between 1900 and 2019. The initial portfolio was set at $1,000 and an initial withdrawal rate of 4% was used.

The analysis led Estrada to conclude that “what leads to failure is the combination of early low returns and inflexible withdrawals. Portfolio depletion can obviously be avoided if the retiree lowers his withdrawals enough to make it through the end of his retirement.”

One way to assess sequence risk is to use actual returns. This method compares annualized returns over the first three, five or 10 years of retirement to the averages of all the retirement periods considered. The lower the annualized returns relative to the averages, the more likely a retiree was a victim of sequence risk.

Another is to use a forecast returns approach. Estrada explains, “If an early sequence of low returns leads a retiree to lower his future inflation-adjusted withdrawals so that they remain sustainable, the next issue to be addressed is by how much.” A retiree has been a victim of sequence risk if the decline in withdrawals is larger than 10% to 15%. He added, “the advantage of this framework is that it enables a retiree to monitor in real time the sustainability of his withdrawal strategy and to dynamically introduce changes that lower, and in the limit eliminate, the probability of portfolio depletion.”

Source: “Sequence Risk: Is It Really a Big Deal?,” by Javier Estrada; IESE Business School, Barcelona, Spain; September 2020.

Discussion

RONALDO J from MD posted over 5 years ago:

This article reflects the abstract view to this risk. As a pending retiree who must rely on these funds there is a real psychological component to running out of money when you have no means (other than depending on the government or relatives) for survival. Seeing your retirement go down 30-40% will cause most people to panic. These real life reactions to this risk and how to avoid them should be the focus of the AAII.


ADAM G from MA posted over 5 years ago:

I explored this subject using quarterly S+P 500 data from 3/87 to 3/17. I iterated for the withdrawal rate that would result in zero shares after thirty years, allowing a 3% COLA annually. My results: For actual data, the rate was 5.97%. If the data was sorted high to low, 0.5%. Lowest to high, 7.11% I arbitrarily and manually mixed the data at random twice and got results of 5.89% and 6.95%. My interpretation is that in the abstract, sequence of returns could be heavenly or catastrophic, but in the real world probably not nearly as extreme.


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: