VMQ StocksFor the value investor looking to harness academic research in
an actively managed portfolio
Bits and BipsNewsletter delivering insights on linking traditional finance, macro trends and cryptocurrency opportunities to help investors build stronger, more diversified portfolios.
All premium products come with free basic membership.
This month’s Mutual Fund First Cut seeks domestic small-cap stock funds that have performed well compared to their peers over the last five years. The list of small-cap funds in the table is grouped by the small-cap stock categories of blended, growth and value and ranked by five-year return within each group. Because individual investors do not typically invest in funds for the short term, it is important to compare funds based on their longer-term performance.
Category averages were included to better compare each fund to its peers and to see how the different investing styles performed.
Funds without consistent and strong relative performance within their categories were eliminated by requiring five-year, three-year and one-year A+ Investor return grades of C or better. The screen excludes funds with loads and requires an expense ratio category rank below 50%. The passing funds are also open to new investors, with a minimum initial purchase no higher than $50,000.
To eliminate funds with excessive risk, funds with an A+ Investor category risk grade of F were excluded. Institutional funds were also excluded, in addition to funds with special share classes. In total, 21 funds made the First Cut.
The category risk index was included to assess the volatility of each fund. If you are going to invest in an actively managed mutual fund with higher risk relative to its peers, you should be properly compensated with higher relative returns.
Small-cap funds have high one-year returns due to the economic recovery from the 2020 bear market caused by the coronavirus pandemic. Additionally, value strategies outperformed growth and blend strategies in the last year; the types of sectors normally considered to be within the value category did well this year as the U.S. recovered strongly.
Thanks.
The limited size of the html table... it's cumbersome having to scroll all over the place to try to review and correlate the data with the ticker/fund. Can that table size be increased to expand in wide screens or pull up in a pop up window or excel?
What does the top section include? Growth? You have yellow headers for the lower sections.
Links do not work for many funds. Requires extra work to try to research and that makes the fund listings of questionable value. "The ticker AFDVX does not exist in our database. " "Sorry, that content wasn't found."
It would be of value to include a row for benchmark index returns in each category to compare the funds to.
Sharp ratio is of value to some of us.
Max drawdown or bear market (say Feb/March 2020) drawdowns are critical to consider when markets are so expensive and many of us are nearing or in retirement. It would be really nice to see if this could be generated especially for small cap funds which are generally more risky. That never seems to be part of normal mutual fund table data.
Other than extra work to select and combine them, I keep wondering why these things are always Mutual Funds OR ETFS but never combined. They are both valid investment options for most people.
You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting. Create an account
Daniel J from TX posted over 4 years ago:
You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Log InCreate an account