Wiley’s 52-Week Low Strategy

Twenty-eight fundamentally strong stocks trading near their 52-week lows.

Luke Wiley’s problem-solving mantra revolves around “inversion,” or the attempt to avoid the factors that would result in the opposite of your desired action.

Wiley was looking at ways to avoid the behaviors, mindset, emotions, market noise and investment strategies that result in poor long-term investment performance.

His journey led to an investment strategy that looks to buy low and sell high, but only focuses on the shares of sound companies trading near their 52-week lows that have a competitive advantage, maintain a strong margin of safety, generate a consistent returns on their invested capital and are financially strong.

Wiley lays out his five-filter investment strategy in the book “The 52-Week Low Formula” (John Wiley & Sons, 2014), which is further discussed in Wiley’s article in this issue.

For this First Cut, we built a filter that captures the strategy using AAII’s Stock Investor Pro fundamental stock screening and research program.

If you wish to buy low and sell high, Wiley argues that you should look among the stocks hitting new 52-week lows, not 52-week highs. Stocks hitting new lows have more sellers than buyers, so it is easier to find bargains.

Wiley employs five primary filters to locate “structurally sound companies” that are currently unpopular.

The stock universe for our First Cut consists of 4,177 exchange-listed domestic firms. The first criteria seek companies possessing a durable competitive advantage by screening for stocks with recent and five-year average gross margins above their industry medians.

We then look for companies with a free cash flow yield (pre-dividend free cash flow divided by enterprise value) above 2.5%, which exceeds the current 10-year Treasury note yield of 2.1%.

Profitability is demanded by screening for return on invested capital (latest year and five-year average) above 10%.

Minimum financial strength is required by specifying that long-term debt not exceed pre-dividend free cash flow by a factor of three.

Finally, we screen for stocks trading within 10% of their 52-week low and that have undergone price declines of at least 20% over the last 52 weeks. Twenty-eight stocks made the First Cut, and they are ranked by their 52-week price change below.

—John Bajkowski, president of AAII

Table 1. Stocks Passing Wiley’s 52-Week Low Strategy (Ranked by Price Change)





Gross
Margin
Free
Cash
Flow
Yield
(%)
Return on
Invested
Capital
(5-Yr Avg)
(%)
LT Debt
to Free
Cash
Flow
(X)


Price
Change
(52-Wk)
(%)


Stock
Price
(52-Wk High-Low)
on 9/18








Industry



Co
(%)
Indus
(%)
Company (Ticker)
World Acceptance Corp. (WRLD) 96.1 57.9 21.1 13.8 2.3 (62.6) $27.41 (96.23-27.01) Consumer Financial Services
Alliance Holdings GP, LP (AHGP) 37.8 18.4 11.9 34.1 1.9 (51.0) $35.39 (72.17-34.30) Coal
Westlake Chemical Corp. (WLK) 29.1 20.5 6.8 15.6 1.2 (44.9) $52.11 (95.54-50.01) Chemicals - Plastics & Rubbers
PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) 59.5 38.4 5.7 13.5 0.0 (41.4) $11.15 (19.52-11.00) Semiconductors
Fossil Group Inc (FOSL) 56.2 27.3 8.1 25.9 2.2 (40.4) $58.74 (115.20-56.01) Jewelry & Silverware
Deckers Outdoor Corp. (DECK) 48.3 38.9 4.7 19.9 0.0 (37.8) $60.95 (99.88-59.62) Footwear
Ralph Lauren Corp. (RL) 57.1 35.9 3.8 17.3 1.2 (36.7) $109.38 (187.49-104.34) Apparel/Accessories
Saia Inc. (SAIA) 77.0 50.7 3.3 10.0 2.8 (36.0) $34.26 (62.31-34.13) Trucking
Raven Industries, Inc. (RAVN) 26.3 20.6 5.2 21.6 0.0 (35.0) $17.35 (27.24-16.30) Fabricated Plastic & Rubber
Tripadvisor Inc (TRIP) 96.3 46.6 2.7 20.6 0.9 (29.9) $68.64 (99.57-62.50) Recreational Activities
NVE Corp. (NVEC) 78.7 38.4 4.2 11.5 0.0 (29.1) $48.22 (81.55-48.14) Semiconductors
QUALCOMM, Inc. (QCOM) 59.9 41.1 4.3 14.1 2.3 (28.8) $54.45 (78.53-52.59) Communications Equipment
Dover Corp. (DOV) 37.7 26.5 6.8 11.7 2.5 (28.7) $60.86 (86.13-55.50) Misc. Fabricated Products
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) 88.9 79.0 5.9 25.6 0.0 (28.1) $28.96 (47.16-27.77) Investment Services
Gap Inc. (GPS) 37.5 36.2 7.0 27.9 1.2 (28.0) $31.57 (44.36-30.75) Retail (Apparel)
NetApp Inc. (NTAP) 62.2 33.8 11.9 11.6 1.5 (27.7) $31.36 (43.75-28.88) Computer Storage Devices
Vitamin Shoppe Inc. (VSI) 33.0 25.0 4.7 12.2 0.0 (27.5) $32.93 (49.04-32.85) Retail (Grocery)
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) 91.5 46.5 3.1 15.3 0.0 (26.7) $31.99 (46.17-29.87) Motion Pictures
MSC Industrial Direct Co. (MSM) 45.4 30.1 3.3 17.7 1.4 (26.1) $64.08 (87.31-63.97) Misc. Capital Goods
Monotype Imaging (TYPE) 81.5 61.1 5.0 11.5 0.0 (26.0) $21.46 (34.42-20.84) Software & Programming
Sun Hydraulics Corp. (SNHY) 39.8 26.5 5.9 21.2 0.0 (25.6) $28.64 (43.58-28.54) Misc. Fabricated Products
Mead Johnson Nutrition (MJN) 62.5 25.2 4.2 40.6 2.0 (23.8) $74.63 (105.45-73.10) Food Processing
Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 33.8 27.4 7.9 16.5 0.4 (23.4) $56.12 (75.49-52.30) Construction & Agricultural Equip
Tennant Company (TNC) 43.1 30.1 3.1 15.3 0.6 (23.0) $54.49 (75.01-54.35) Misc. Capital Goods
Dillard’s, Inc. (DDS) 36.6 35.9 7.8 13.3 2.2 (22.8) $89.87 (144.21-89.35) Retail (Department & Discount)
Coach Inc. (COH) 69.6 36.2 7.9 38.3 1.2 (22.1) $29.10 (43.87-27.62) Retail (Apparel)
Psychemedics Corp. (PMD) 49.6 36.3 4.0 26.4 1.2 (21.4) $10.54 (17.83-9.82) Healthcare Facilities
Tiffany & Co. (TIF) 59.9 35.1 4.1 12.7 1.7 (20.6) $79.35 (110.60-78.90) Retail (Specialty Non-Apparel)
Source: AAII’s Stock Investor Pro/Thomson Reuters. Data as of 9/18/2015.

Criteria for Stock Investor Pro Users


Field: Operator: Factor: Compare to:
  Exchange Not Equal   Over the counter
And ADR/ADS Stock Is False    
And Country Equals   United States
And Gross margin 12m >   Industry Gross margin 12m
And Gross margin - 5 year Avg. >   Industry Gross margin - 5 year Avg.
And FC - Free Cash Flow Yield >=   2.5
And FC - Free Cash Flw (w/o div) >   0
And Enterprise Value Q1 >   0
And Return on inv cap - 5 year avg >=   10
And Return on inv cap Y1 >=   10
And FC - LT Debt to FC Flow <=   3
And FC - LT Debt to FC Flow >=   0
And FC - Price Chg 52-wk Low <=   10
And Price Change 52 week <   -20
Custom Fields:
FC - Free Cash Flw (w/o div): [Cash from operations 12m]-[Capital expenditures 12m]
FC - Free Cash Flow Yield: ([Cash from operations 12m]-[Capital expenditures 12m])/[Enterprise Value Q1]*100
FC - LT Debt to FC Flow: [Long-term debt Q1]/([Cash from operations 12m]-[Capital expenditures 12m])
FC - Price Chg 52-wk Low: ([Price]/[Price--low 52 week]-1)*100

Discussion

Thomas Musselman from AZ posted over 10 years ago:

It would be nice to summarize compound annual growth and sharpe compared to the market in backtests.


Don Brockhage from NV posted over 10 years ago:

I agree with Thomas, I've done quite a bit of modeling and have found that, in general buying stocks making new 52 wk lows leads to under-performance!


Patrick Nicolas from CA posted over 10 years ago:

A stock may reach its 52 week low for some underlying reason that does not show on any screen. A screen does not replace a full-blown analysis. I had some success with a similar strategy with the following differences: - Price between 3 to 10% above 52-week low - I did not use LT debt - I used Y-to-Y earnings growth for the last two quarters.


Don Brockhage from NV posted over 10 years ago:

Hi Patrick, Thanks for your informative comments I would like to ask for your opinion, or anyone else's reading this post for that matter. Recently (about 1 year ago) I compared how I would have done if I went with screens versus screens + analysis and found that (for me) using just the screens provided the best results (Sharpe ratio). I have some back ground in finance, (MBA, accounting, CFA level 1 etc) so to be honest with you I was distraught to see that this was the case! The back test period was about 8 years. I've cut way back on analysis, any other thoughts than, "Don I guess you're just not that good of an investor..."? Thanks


Sundeep from TX posted over 10 years ago:

Is there any backtesting available for this strategy?


Don Brockhage from NV posted over 10 years ago:

Hi Sundeep, No straightforward back testing data that I am aware of. I spend quite a bit of cash to purchase several other data bases and along with "as released" data that I have been collecting for years run my own custom back tests. Its time consuming and takes a bit of programming. I'm, sure there are better ways but over the years I've developed my own system that works fairly well for me.


Doug from NY posted over 10 years ago:

Don B., does that mean that following the screen, but eliminating any stocks that your analysis "approves of" would produce an even better result than the screen alone? (A legend on Wall Street for generations has been the "small investors" who are the perfect contrary indicator.) (No insult intended. I just wonder if there's something interesting going on....)


Gail from MA posted over 10 years ago:

This is the exact opposite of the IBD CAN SLIM investment strategy. It would be interesting to compare the two to see which one has better returns!


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: