Six Steps for a Successful Midyear Portfolio Review

A midyear review differs from both the daily look you may give your portfolio and the more comprehensive annual review.

Charles Rotblut leads a class in AAII's new Essential Investing Video Course. Go to https://www.aaii.com/ves for more information and to subscribe.

  • Review your asset allocation targets
  • Check position sizes and sell rules
  • Compare savings contributions to your goal

Midyear portfolio reviews provide the opportunity to give your portfolio a checkup without the daily noise of the financial markets. When done right, they are fairly quick but provide useful feedback.

In this article, we go over the six steps of midyear portfolio reviews. A midyear review differs from both the daily look you may give your portfolio and the more comprehensive annual review that is part of the PRISM Wealth-Building Process. Midyear reviews are a check to see if any corrections are needed.

1. Ensure Your Allocation Is Reasonably Close to Target

The first half of 2024 has been favorable to individual investors. Large-cap stocks have set new record highs. Yields on cash equivalents—money market accounts, certificates of deposit (CDs), etc.—remain juicy. The economy continues to expand. S&P 500 index companies are reporting growth in both revenue and earnings.

It’s easy to get lulled into complacency. Successful investors take steps to prevent this from happening.

A simple exercise is to ask whether your current allocation is reasonably close to your target or if it has strayed off course. Vanguard suggests semiannual or annual rebalancing when one or more of your allocations to an asset class or asset class group are more than five or 10 percentage points off target.

If you’ve purposely raised your allocation to CDs, short-term Treasury bills, money market funds, etc., because of the higher yields, ask yourself if this fits into your long-term plan. If your long-term plan calls for allocating more to equities and bonds, create a strategy for rebalancing out of cash and into those assets.

2. Check the Relative Position Sizes of Your Investments

We believe in letting winners run within preset limits. When a particular stock or another investment like a sector/industry exchange-traded fund (ETF) in your portfolio has realized stellar gains, it may be time to pare it.

The key is determining whether the investment meets any of your sell rules. If it doesn’t, then determine whether the investment accounts for too large of a position in your portfolio. The strategies followed by the model portfolios for both AAII’s Stock Superstars Report (SSR) and VMQ Stocks consider trimming positions that have grown to 2.5 times more than the average position size for the entire portfolio. (Average position size is calculated by dividing the portfolio’s total dollar value by the number of positions held. Your threshold can be larger or smaller than 2.5 times the average.)

AAII’s My Portfolio tool can assist you with this process. For all members, it shows the percentage weight of each investment in your portfolio, as shown in Figure 1. A+ Investor subscribers can further use the Diversification Analyzer to determine if their portfolio allocations have strayed too far off track.

3. Use Your Sell Rules to Determine If an Investment Should Be Sold

Investments evolve over time. Those that evolve in a way that does not match your strategy are candidates for removal.

For stocks, your sell rules might include a minimum amount of earnings growth, an upper limit on valuation, a certain level of relative strength or meeting certain standards for fundamental strength. (The A+ Investor Stock Grades can help you track all of these.) Here are benchmarks that may help you:

  • Price-Earnings (P/E) Ratio—most expensive 20%: 40.0 and above
  • 12-Month Sales Growth—lowest 20%: –10.0% or below
  • Return on Assets—50th percentile: 0.2%

For relative strength, a simple rule used by many AAII model portfolios is to compare a stock’s return against a benchmark. If the stock has been held for a few years (two to four years, depending on the portfolio) and has underperformed, it is removed. This simple rule indicates the market doesn’t agree that the stock is attractive. (Exceptions may be made if the stock currently meets the portfolio’s addition rules.)

Mutual funds and ETFs should be compared against their peers. While we don’t encourage selling a fund based on its six-month performance, giving your fund holdings a quick overview may alert you to longer-term trends that are developing.

AAII members can view current grades on a mutual fund or ETF’s Evaluator page. Type a fund’s name or ticker symbol into the search box at the top-left corner of pages on AAII.com. Grades for mutual funds and ETFs tell you how the fund ranks compared to other funds in the same category.

4. Assess Your Tax Situation

Looking at your tax liabilities and deductions now gives you time to make any adjustments.

A good place to start is with your brokerage statements. Have you claimed any losses so far this year? What about capital gains? Excess losses can provide the opportunity to offset any capital gains realized later in the year. If you have excess capital gains, see if there are any losses you are carrying forward from past years. Those carryforward losses can be applied against capital gains realized this year up to a net maximum of $3,000.

If retired, check to see if you have taken your full required minimum distribution (RMD) yet. If not, ensure that an automatic withdrawal is set up for later in the year. Alternatively, make sure that a calendar reminder is set up. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) extended the waiver on RMDs from inherited individual retirement accounts (IRAs) through the end of 2024.

Then look at your income, deductions and, if applicable, estimated tax payments. Has there been a change in income that would move you to a different tax bracket, increase how much of your Social Security benefits will be taxed or increase what you will pay in future Medicare premiums? (See our tax guide for more information.) Have your deductible expenses been higher or lower than expected? Have your estimated tax payments been too low or too high? Consider whether there are opportunities to act before year-end if the answer to any of these questions is “yes.” Figure 2 shows the current income breakpoints for tax on capital gains and qualified dividends.

5. Give Your Savings Contributions and Spending a Once-Over

If you are saving for retirement or another goal, compare your actual savings contributions to your plan. Are you meeting your goals? If not, see if there is a way to get back on track.

This year, you can contribute up to $7,000 to a traditional IRA or Roth IRA. The limit for 401(k), 403(b) and 457(b) plan contributions is $23,000. Those who are age 50 or older have the higher limits of $8,000 and $30,500, respectively.

Retirees should check how much they are withdrawing. Basing your withdrawals solely on the RMD will ensure you don’t outlive your savings but will also lead to greater fluctuations in how much you can withdraw each year. If you adjusted your annual withdrawal amount for inflation, run a quick calculation to ensure that it isn’t creating strain on your portfolio.

6. Adjust for Any Life-Stage Changes

Finally, take a moment to consider what has happened in your life over the last six months. Is there anything that affects your financial situation, goals or beneficiary information? If so, make the appropriate adjustments.

Once you have completed this process, add a calendar reminder to conduct a more thorough review on or near New Year’s Day.

Discussion

ROBERT A from NC posted over 2 years ago:

"We believe in letting winners run within preset limits. When a particular stock or another investment like a sector/industry exchange-traded fund (ETF) in your portfolio has realized stellar gains, it may be time to pare it." Why on earth would you preset any limits on your winners' growth!? That's the sort of mindless conventional wisdom that drives me nuts! That's the sort of "logic" that will prevent you from ever having a 10,000% gain in a stock. I'm so glad I never listened to such "wisdom."


ROBERT A from NC posted over 2 years ago:

Imagine that in 1999, you buy a portfolio consisting of 10 stocks---100 shares of each. One of them is NVDA. Now, NVDA has had quite a volatile history, so it likely would have exceeded your "preset limits" at some point. If you'd sold in response to that, how would you feel about that now? If instead of selling, you simply held onto it, whatever your other 9 stocks did would not matter. They could have completely cratered, but your 100 shares of NVDA (now 48000 shares from splits) would have provided a comfortable retirement by themselves. That's why it is better to let your winners run and let the Pareto Principle do its thing. Be patient! Stay the course!


JOHN L from NJ posted over 2 years ago:

Robert A is correct (again). Regular 6 month reviews are a counter productive waste of time. The more trading and changing you do; the worse the long term results.


BARRY J from TX posted over 2 years ago:

Because I read a lot of the articles AAII publishes as my primary source of continuous learning, mId-year strikes me as an ill-timed point on the calendar to review a portfolio. It does qualify as a "disciplined" approach to rebalancing, but only because it is rigid. #1 The Gregorian calendar was designed without a single consideration for how stock markets perform since it was created 100 years before stock markets were organized. #2 AAII has published several articles that propose/discuss the idea of the statistical superiority of "seasonality" as a tool to schedule a disciplined approach for portfolio review and rebalancing. Some of the articles I remember are: The January Effect, The Best/Worst 6-months (Nov-Apr provides superior results than May-Oct), and my favorite because of its high data support, "Using Seasonal and Cyclical Stock Market Patterns" providing data on how presidential terms, calendar months, and a basket of January indicators provide insight into market direction by Jeffrey Hirsch in June 2013.


BARRY J from TX posted over 2 years ago:

Having tried to make the point that there are other known options to a mid-point review, I do see how taking a clear-eyed look at the potential market differences between the 2024 Jan-Jun markets and the 2024 Jul-Dec markets. I have read several articles (some AAII has written) that describe multiple existing market DISTORTIONS that beg for a correction/reversion to the mean. Let's compare Jan-Jun 2024 to Jul-Dec 2024. First, Jan-Jun 2024: #1 The high degree of INDEX CONCENTRATION in the (Top 3, T5, T10, etc.) of the market-weighted SPX vs an equal-weighted SPX distorts ETF holdings; #2 markets are OVERSOLD reflecting distorted VALUATIONS and BALANCE; #3 The Fed made no FFR rate cuts in Jan-Jun distorting market VOLUME and MOMENTUM; and #4 UST2/UST10 yields distorted the risk/return PREMIUMS. Now, potential changes in Jul-Dec #1 the Fed has committed to at least one FFR rate cut before year-end which will drive interest rates and borrowing costs down; causing #2 yield curves to revert to its mean restoring riak/cost premiums; #3 value and small-cap stocks with strong balance sheets (ie, not "zombie stocks") would likely be major beneficiaries of changes in #1, #2, and #3; #4 (the other shoe waiting to fall) the huge stack of increasing opposing tensions built up around the 2024 ELECTION OUTCOMES - POTUS, control of Senate (impeachments), control of the House (FISCAL POLICY and BUDGET allocations), etc. #5 related issues will resolve themselves with an accompanying "big bang" that will radiate enormous kinetic energies that will create the potential for CHANGE in to correct IMBALANCEs in current markets; and #6 Ex-US situations will continue to languor and vex EX-Us investments opportunities. Sometimes rebalancing at periods of high change may prove more aligned with opportunities for a strategy to "be greedy when others are fearful."


BARRY J from TX posted over 2 years ago:

All the “ifs” in the article – I counted over 20 –reminded me to reread Rudyard Kipling’s 1943 poem “If.” I post it here for those unfamiliar with it. Robert, John, and many other AAIIers follow the creed of steadfastness “If” proposes. “If” has been interpreted as a call for maintaining a balanced perspective. So “If” could support both “staying the course” or rebalancing to get back on course. The beautiful rhythmic meter gets lost in the limitation of the forced format here. --------------------------------------“If” by Rudyard Kipling -------------------------------- “If you can dream—and not make dreams your master; If you can think—and not make thoughts your aim; If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same; If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, And stoop and build ’em up with worn-out tools: If you can make one heap of all your winnings And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss, And lose, and start again at your beginnings And never breathe a word about your loss; If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew To serve your turn long after they are gone, And so hold on when there is nothing in you Except the Will which says to them: ‘Hold on!’ If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, Or walk with Kings—nor lose the common touch, If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, If all men count with you, but none too much; If you can fill the unforgiving minute With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run, Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it, And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!”


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: