Choosing an Equity Portfolio You Can Live With—for Life

The path matters as much as the returns themselves. The goal is to find a path smooth enough that you will stay on it.

Paul Merriman leads a class in AAII's new Essential Investing Video Course. Go to https://www.aaii.com/ves for more information and to subscribe.

  • Investing success depends on emotional resilience—the ability to stay invested through volatile markets
  • Traditional risk metrics miss real risk; portfolios should be evaluated by behavioral challenges
  • Choosing a sustainable portfolio mix helps investors endure downturns and achieve long-term financial success

For most investors, the challenge of investing sounds deceptively simple: find the best returns and build a portfolio that delivers them. But after more than 60 years in this business, I’ve learned that returns are not the real challenge. The real challenge is surviving the journey required to earn them.

Investors don’t fail because they chose the wrong asset class or missed the top-performing fund. Investors fail because, at the worst possible moment, they abandon a strategy they can no longer endure.

That moment rarely shows up in average returns. It doesn’t appear on long-term charts, and it’s almost never captured in traditional measures of risk. Yet, it is the moment that determines financial success or failure.

The Problem With How We Measure Risk

For decades, the investing industry has relied on statistics like standard deviation to define risk. While useful, these numbers often miss what matters most to real investors.

Risk isn’t a number. Risk is the moment an investor says, “I can’t take it anymore.” It’s the sleepless nights, the second-guessing and the overwhelming urge to sell. Even well-informed investors make decisions during these moments that permanently damage their long-term results.

Here’s the irony: Portfolios with similar long-term returns can feel completely different to live with. Some demand a level of emotional resilience that few investors actually possess. Others offer a smoother path—one that investors are far more likely to stay on. Understanding that difference is where wisdom begins.

The Pains and Gains of Investing

In my April 2022 AAII Journal article, “The Pains and Gains of Investing,” I introduced a simple but powerful idea: Evaluate portfolios not just by their returns, but by the “pain” required to earn them.

I examined measures such as:

  • Number of profitable years
  • Average gain during profitable years
  • Best single-year gain
  • Number of losing years
  • Average loss during losing years
  • Worst single-year loss

These measures revealed an essential truth: The path to returns matters as much as the returns themselves. Two portfolios may arrive at similar long-term destinations, but the journey they take can be dramatically different—and that journey may determine whether investors actually stay on board.

A Simple Test: Which Portfolio Would You Choose?

Before we go further, try this exercise. Look at Figure 1, which shows three portfolios. I won’t tell you what they are yet. All you’ll see is their history of returns, profitability and losses. Now, answer this simple question: Which one would you choose for the equity portion of your portfolio—for the rest of your life?

Review Figure 1 and select a portfolio before continuing to read more.

Figure 1 Which Portfolio Would You Choose? If you had to choose just one of these all-equity portfolios to hold for the rest your life, which would you choose based on the information below?

What Most Investors Do

When investors study this kind of information, they tend to fall into one of the following three groups.

  1. The Return Chasers: They choose the portfolio with the strongest decade returns.
  2. The Comfort Seekers: They choose the portfolio with the most consistent gains and the fewest losing years.
  3. The Balancers: They split their money—half in what feels safest, half in what looks most rewarding.

The Reveal

Here’s what the portfolios in Figure 1 actually are.

  • Portfolio A: The S&P 500 index
  • Portfolio B: A Worldwide All Value portfolio
  • Portfolio C: A Worldwide Small-Cap Value portfolio

The Lesson That Changes Everything

Now comes the most important lesson to take away: The best-looking portfolio is not always the best-lived portfolio.

The Worldwide All Value portfolio may deliver higher long-term returns than the S&P 500, but it also demands greater emotional resilience. Value stocks can underperform for years, even a decade, at a time. The S&P 500 may feel safer, but it may not deliver the same long-term outcome. And for many investors, the best answer isn’t choosing between them—it’s combining them in a way they can actually live with.

Why This Exercise Matters

This simple exercise does something most investing advice fails to do: It forces you to face the reality of investing before you commit. It prompts you to ask not just “What return can I earn?” but “What must I endure to earn it?”

Understanding the Building Blocks

Behind every portfolio are specific equity asset classes, each with its own return profile and risk characteristics. Every portfolio outcome in Figure 1 is the product of the following 10 building blocks.

  • U.S. large-cap blend (the S&P 500)
  • U.S. large-cap value
  • U.S. small-cap blend
  • U.S. small-cap value
  • U.S. real estate investment trusts (REITs)
  • International large-cap blend
  • International large-cap value
  • International small-cap blend
  • International small-cap value
  • Emerging markets

Table 1 shows the allocations for the Merriman Financial Education Foundation’s Sound Investing Portfolios.

table 1 Sound Investing Portfolios The Sound Investing Portfolios are built on decades of research and real-world application, offering investors a range of diversified strategies tailored to different preferences and goals.

From Theory to Real Life

Investors don’t experience averages. They experience life—one year at a time.

For investors still in the accumulation phase, the tables we publish at the Merriman Financial Education Foundation website show the impact of contributing regularly through both good and bad markets. Investors can see how dollar-cost averaging works across each of our recommended portfolios and why staying invested, even through downturns, can be the most powerful financial decision they make.

For investors in retirement, the tables show the impact of different withdrawal rates—both fixed withdrawals adjusted for inflation and flexible withdrawals without adjustments. In every scenario, the tables reveal how long money lasts, how early losses affect outcomes and what may be left for children and charities.

The Three Rs of Investing

Three “Rs” determine your success as an investor.

  • Returns: The reward for having the discipline to save.
  • Risk: The cost of exposing your money to market volatility.
  • Resilience: The ability to stay the course.

Most investors understand returns. Some understand risk. Very few prepare for resilience. And yet, resilience is what ultimately determines success.

Investors don’t fail because they lack information. They fail because they weren’t prepared for the experience. They didn’t know how bad it could feel, how long it could last or how difficult it would be to stay invested.

A Better Way Forward

The goal isn’t to find the perfect portfolio. The goal is to find a portfolio you can live with for a lifetime.

Once investors understand the trade-offs, the next step is implementation.

We at the Merriman Financial Education Foundation recommend evidence-based equity portfolios using funds from Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA) and Avantis Investors. These firms are built on broad diversification, factor-based investing, low costs and decades of academic research. Our best-in-class recommendations are listed in Table 2.

table 2 The Merriman 2026 Best-in-Class Equity ETF Recommendations Updated February 2026

The Myth of “There Is No Alternative”

Investors are often told that they have no choice: React to the coming bear market, go to cash and chase what’s been working.

But there is a clear alternative. It’s called discipline.

Building the Conditions for Success

Success in investing doesn’t come from prediction. It comes from preparation—from understanding history, accepting uncertainty and making wise decisions in advance.

Our mission is to help investors make better decisions that lead to more money in their pockets and less in someone else’s. We’re committed to presenting the evidence clearly, including the good periods and the bad, and helping investors build the emotional resilience to stay the course.

The hopeful outcome? Better returns at similar or lower risk—and the commitment to see it through.

Final Thought

When markets fall and fear rises, you’ll hear it again: “There is no alternative.”

But there is. There’s a better plan, better information and the discipline to follow it.

This isn’t just about investing. It’s about behavior. And for those who prepare—not just intellectually, but emotionally—it has the power to change your financial future. 

Discussion

BARRY J from TX posted 3 months ago:

Paul, #1 It is always great to get additional reinforcement from your MEF missives to be mindful, especially when so timely. #2 Just as we investors "experience life one day at a time,” we also experience variation (price movements and overall valuation) in our portfolios AND variation in our goals and plans as our life experiences introduce variation. That's life." "C'est la vie." #3 Both journeys take the same skills you named – preparation, discipline, and resilience. That’s a 3-legged stool. You need all 3 legs to stay balanced ... and seated. #4 I would have appreciated side-by-side comparisons of the 10 equities by Total Expense Ratios and past returns performance of the funds you recommend here, so I can compare the same characteristics you recommend for investors to pursue with the past performance of the fund providers. I was bemused by the absence of Vanguard funds and ETFs as choices. Regards, please keep making AAII a regular stop on your educational itinerary.


ROBERT A from NC posted 3 months ago:

The general message of this article is fantastic. As a buy-and-hold investor for more than 45 years, I know first-hand that staying the course with a sound, 100%-equities methodology leads to a very comfortable retirement. Every time I have allowed myself to be sidetracked from my methodology, I have regretted it.


ROBERT A from NC posted 3 months ago:

But looking at the author’s recommendations in Table 2 makes me want to pull my hair out! The expense ratios are too high, and the performances are too low. Most of these ACTIVELY MANAGED ETFs were created after 2020, so they don’t have much of a track record on which one can depend, but few of them appear to have kept up with the S&P500 over their lives. Only ONE of them has an expense ratio at or below 0.1% (DFUS, which has past performance similar to that of an S&P500 ETF like IVV, except that IVV’s expense ratio is 1/3 that of DFUS). I humbly suggest that one should do some comparison shopping before buying one of those expensive models. Vanguard, Schwab, and Fidelity all have index ETFs that offer more for less. (Just my humble opinion.)


JOHN L from NJ posted 3 months ago:

Seriously agree with Robert A. Any cost that detracts from returns impacts the compounding of returns. Even small differences in return become very very large differences in portfolio value over 20 year periods.


Paul M from FL posted 3 months ago:

Thank you all for your thoughtful comments. For those who have a problem usiing DFA or Avantis ETFs (commission free at Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab) I hope you will read my earlier AAII article about non-traditional index funds. Supercharge Your Portfolio With a Nontraditional Index Fund by Paul Merriman | July 2025 I do recommend Vanguard ETFs as well but the performance has not been as productive as similar DFA and Avantis ETFs. DFA has been managing factor based index funds for over 30 years. Compare the long term returns of DFFVX and DFSVX since their inceptions in 1993 and 2000. Both of these are small cap value funds. While I have used DFA funds since 1994, they weren't available to the public until they introduced ETFs several years ago. Avantis was formed in 2019 by a group of people who were with DFA for many years. I totally agree with the importance of expenses but I also know there are other considerations. Vanguard funds are driven by the size of the companies and others consider value, quality, momentum as well as size. I suggest you compare the returns of AVUV and DFSV with the Vanguard small cap value funds (VBR, VIOV, and VTWV). I find the easiest way to compare is using the Morningstar Chart Function. Of course you will find the longer term returns of DFA mutual funds favorable as well. But you can't invest directly into the DFA mutual funds.


ROBERT A from NC posted 2 months ago:

Paul, I appreciate the response. It's impossible to make an apples-to-apples comparison of returns since inception among funds with different start dates. But looking at 10-year returns for DFFVX and DFSVX in comparison to IVV, the first two are seriously lagging IVV (which is essentially the S&P500). That certainly doesn't lead me to conclude that the much higher expense ratios of the first two are worth it. As for AVUV and DFSV, one can compare them with your selected Vanguard funds over only 5 years or so, although AVUV and DFSV have outperformed over that period. Nevertheless, both AVUV and DFSV have lagged the S&P500 since their inceptions, which would not induce me to pay their higher expense ratios.


Paul M from FL posted 2 months ago:

The good news is we have over 25 year results for DFFVX and DFSVX. Both of them have far outperformed VOO or other S&P 500 and TMI funds over the last 25 years. If we believe that higher risk equity asset classes are going to out perform less risky indexes, my focus is how the similar equity asset classes have done. In other words, I don't spend a lot of time comparing small cap value funds with large cap blend funds. That doesn't help us select the best small cap value fund. My question is not do I want to compare S&P 500 to small cap value but how do I select the best small cap value fund if I think I should have small cap value in my portfolio. If that is the goal I think there is ample evidence that non tradtional index funds at DFA and Avantis are far superior to the traditional index funds in the same asset class.


DAVID S from TN posted 2 months ago:

Paul, I suggest 2 additional pain measures: 1. Average number of years to recover from a losing year. 2. Longest number of years to recover from a losing year. Thoughts?


Paul M from FL posted 2 months ago:

Hi David, I hope you will check out the chart function on Morningstar to compare the recovery from the 2000-2002 and 2007-2009 bear markets. I think you will find the recovery from losses were much better using DFFVX vs. VFINX. It is also interesting to see the returns during the 2000-2002 bear market. DFFVX almost broke even. And yes when we look at 1928 through present returns of the S&P 500 and small cap value, there were many 15 year periods that small cap underperformed large cap blend, which is one reason the asset class isn't for everyone. I waited on one investment for 30 years to mature. It turned out to be the best investment I ever made but through the 26th year it was one of the worst! Real buy and hold investing isn't easy!


You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account

Log In

Get your free copy of our special report analyzing the tech stocks most likely to outperform the market.

Download the FREE Report Here: