The Travel Stocks I Bought Early in the Coronavirus Pandemic
by Charles Rotblut | November 12, 2020
Featured Tickers:Ever since the U.S. began experiencing its first big surge of coronavirus cases in March, my wife and I have been maintaining a position in five travel stocks. We have been making a contrarian bet that the companies we hold shares in will recover once the pandemic ends.
Those of you who are regular readers may view this as being contradictory to the Individual Investor Wealth-Building Process I’ve been rolling out over the past several months. It’s not. Even within the context of a long-term plan for how you will invest, there can be room to speculate. The key is to do so in a defined manner.
I’ll share with you how I’ve gone about speculating in travel stocks. And, yes, I’ll name the stocks we were holding as well. Before I do so, I want to emphasize that this is not a recommendation to buy any of the five stocks. Rather, this week’s commentary simply provides a real-life example of how an individual investor can adhere to a long-term plan and still seek to take advantage of special situations.
Let’s start with our goals and tolerance for risk since both should drive all other investing decisions. Our primary goal is funding retirement. It’s still many years way. My willingness to tolerate market volatility and having a strategy for coping with it (portfolio rebalancing) plus my wife’s understanding of the benefits of long-term investing allows us to handle a high level of risk. We also have a combined high allocation to index mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). This gives us an additional ability to tolerate the risk of individual securities since we are getting “the market’s” return for a large part of our portfolio.
Nearly all of the individual stocks we hold are either very long-term holdings or follow the same strategy used for VMQ Stocks, which I oversee. It’s very rare for us to speculate on stocks.
A bit of background will explain why we chose to “sin a little.” We were both traveling regularly before the pandemic and had a cruise scheduled. When Norwegian Cruise Line offered to apply the cost of our late-March cruise toward a future booking, we canceled the trip and took the credit.
Our assumption—and the assumption of the friends we were supposed to take the trip with—was that the travel industry would bounce back once the pandemic ended. Furthermore, we assumed all of those cruise company credits would either be eventually used (leading to on-ship and excursion spending) or expire worthless. So, I decided to look at the valuations of travel stocks.
Using AAII’s Stock Investor Pro, I downloaded data for nearly 60 travel stocks using data as of March 6, 2020. I then whittled down the list to primarily U.S.-based hotels, airlines, cruise companies and travel agencies. The current versus historical average valuations (price to book, price to earnings and price to sales) for each stock were then looked at as well as their Z double prime scores. The latter measures whether a company is at risk of going into financial distress.
We settled on five stocks: Delta Air Lines Inc.
(DAL), Southwest Airlines Co.
(LUV), Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
(NCLH), Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) and Expedia Group Inc.
(EXPE). Of the five, Southwest is the primary airline we fly on and we have taken cruises on Royal Caribbean. As stated above, we have a credit for a future Norwegian cruise. We passed on hotel companies because their valuations at the time did not reflect significant discounts relative to their historical averages.
The mixture of industries and companies was purposeful. Investing in the travel sector was risky enough—we didn’t want to increase the risk by focusing on one company or industry.
Notice the date: March 6, 2020. We did not know the full extent of the coronavirus pandemic or its impact on travel at that time. So, we staggered our purchases. We bought shares for all five stocks on March 9. We then added to our positions with larger purchases on March 16 and 17 after their share prices and the overall market fell. Spreading out the purchase dates was something we planned to do before the first purchase was made.
Given the high level of risk, we took two other steps. The first was that we defined beforehand the maximum we would invest in these stocks. It was an amount small enough not to harm our goals if we were wrong but large enough to give our savings a boost if we were right. We also isolated the stocks to a single IRA account. Doing so made it easier to track how much is allocated to them.
Fast forward to today, and we still hold shares in all five stocks. They remain very risky, as can be evidenced by their A+ Investor Quality Grades of D or F. Air travel remains depressed. Just 596,475 people passed through TSA checkpoints on Tuesday versus 2.15 million a year ago. Royal Caribbean has offered limited sailings out of foreign ports, while Norwegian has canceled all sailing through the end of this year—and potentially longer.
In between March and now, these stocks have been very volatile. We have used the volatility to take some profits, given the risk of at least one of the companies going bankrupt. The proceeds from those sales have been put into a broad-market ETF. The combination of zero-dollar brokerage commissions and the tax advantages of an IRA made doing so feasible. Taking smaller profits was also part of our plan before we made the initial investments. The broad-market ETF is being used to maintain an equity allocation, in accordance with our broader allocation targets.
There are a few takeaways I’d like to leave you with. We went into these stocks with both a plan of action and an understanding of the potential downside. We determined how much we would allocate to all five stocks before we made the initial investments and have stuck to that number. We didn’t try to time our investments but did stagger the purchases. Perhaps, most importantly, we’ve neither panicked nor fallen in love with the stocks. They are risky and so the volatility has never bothered us. At the same time, if travel stays depressed for a longer-than-anticipated time after the pandemic ends, we’re prepared to walk away.
- The concept of nibbling at profits while holding out for bigger gains comes from “Being Wrong and Still Making Money,” which appeared in the 2016 AAII Journal.
- The Z double prime score, mentioned above, was created by New York University professor Edward Altman. Here’s his explanation of how to use the Z score to assess the risk of bankruptcy.
- For our November AAII Journal Big Question, we asked AAII members about the strategies they are using to make portfolio withdrawals. Many AAII retirees said they limit withdrawals to the RMD amount.
- The latest Quarterly ETF Update and Mutual Fund Update can also be found in this month’s AAII Journal.
Optimism among individual investors about the short-term direction of the stock market rose to its highest level in nearly three years. Meanwhile, both neutral and bearish sentiment declined.
Bullish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will rise over the next six months, rose 17.9 percentage points to 55.8%. Optimism was last higher on January 3, 2018 (59.8%). Prior to this week’s reading, bullish sentiment had been at or below its historical average of 38.0% for 35 consecutive weeks.
Neutral sentiment, expectations that stock prices will stay essentially unchanged over the next six months, fell by 11.3 percentage points to 19.3%. This is the lowest reading since April 8, 2020 (18.7%). Neutral sentiment is below its historical average of 31.5% for the 42nd time out of the past 44 weeks.
Bearish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will fall over the next six months, declined 6.6 percentage points to 24.9%. Pessimism was last lower on January 22, 2020 (24.8%). Prior to this week’s reading, bearish sentiment had been above its historical average of 30.5% for 37 consecutive weeks.
Optimism is now at an unusually high level. Neutral sentiment is at an unusually low level. Historically, both above-average readings for bullish sentiment and below-average readings for neutral sentiment have been followed by below-average six- and 12-month returns for the S&P 500 index.
We send out weekly reminders about taking the survey to a rotating group of AAII members every Monday. It seems likely that this week’s results were influenced by the coinciding news about the successful trials for the coronavirus vaccine being developed by Pfizer and BioNTech.
Also influencing individual investors’ sentiment are the outcome of the election, the economy, valuations and interest rates.

Bullish: 55.8%, up 17.9 points
Neutral: 19.3%, down 11.3 points
Bearish: 24.9%, down 6.6 points
Bullish: 38.5%
Neutral: 31.0%
Bearish: 30.5%
November 5, 2020 Summarizing Your Investing Plan
October 29, 2020 The Processes I Use for Managing My Portfolio
October 22, 2020 For Portfolio Reviews, Look at Only What You Need To
October 15, 2020 Two Simple Ways to Avoid Estate Planning Problems
Discussion
Barry C Johnson from TX posted over 5 years ago:
Confession: I do not share your enthusiasm for cruise ships. I much prefer a golf course. I get your point: you followed your wealth-building strategy step by step in this example. Point made. Well done. As Lucy's sign used to say for Charlie Brown: "Psychiatric Help 5 Cents." "The fat lady" in the Lido Deck cabin hasn't sung yet. Do I sense some emotional rationalization in the phrasing, tone, and timing of this article that seems to portend you already expect an unfavorable outcome from your emotion-driven decision to invest in one of your hobbies at a time when you are currently denied access because of very high risk to your health? Is it possible your investment decision is a compensation mechanism for the lost gratification of not being able to engage in your hobby directly?
Barry C Johnson from TX posted over 5 years ago:
Just in: This article in the 12/13/20 Wall Street Journal is on point here "Tourism Investors Missed Their Ticket to Paradise" https://www.wsj.com/articles/tourism-investors-missed-their-ticket-to-paradise-11605198535?mod=djemheard_t
vic smyth from Illinois posted over 5 years ago:
This week is the first time since the pandemic broke that the sentiment survey turned super bullish with twice as many bulls than bears; even those on the sidelines that voted neutral jumped in the bullish camp -- the ultimate sell signal that I've been waiting for.
John Lambert from NJ posted over 5 years ago:
Another take away: Speculation is hard!
Bud from Washington posted over 5 years ago:
Was there any particular reason you decided to write this article shortly after a MAJOR jump in travel related stocks?
Charles Rotblut from Illinois posted over 5 years ago:
Barry-Our decision to look at the travel stocks was based on the valuations and our expectation that travel would rebound once the pandemic ended. The big unknown was, and continues to be, is how big the chasm is between pre-virus travel and rebound. If valuations weren't as low as they were, we would have passed on the stocks.
Vic-We send out reminders to take the Sentiment Survey on Mondays. This week, the reminders were sent on the same day the vaccine news was making headlines.
John-Yes, speculation is hard, which is why I rarely do it.
Bud-Given the vaccine news, I thought there would be interest in travel stocks. But it was a good opportunity to discuss the process. As I stated in the article, I'm not recommending any of the five stocks. They were simply were being used as examples.
Thanks for reading,
Charles
M L Wass from Texas posted over 5 years ago:
The problem with airlines, and perhaps other travel companies, is that they have taken on so much debt. Lowering that debt will take several years and will inhibit profits, dividends and growth for a while. Watch the debt.
Steven Sears from Iowa posted over 5 years ago:
Money cannot buy love, but money can buy LUV. I bought Southwest Airlines right after 9/11 and I did ok. I bought Iberia Bank right after Katrina and not so good. There is a German word for taking comfort in the misery of others. Schadenfreude. Actually for me, I just liked to gamble. I am too old now, too close to the end. Good luck to you.
Claude from GA posted over 5 years ago:
The shame of it all is that this was all done in an IRA account, where (1) the losses cannot be used to good advantage on federal income tax returns, (2) the gains will all be taxed at ordinary income rates (higher than capital gain tax rates), and (3) the timing of the distributions after age 72 will cease to be under the owner’s full control, which means loss of control over the tax bracket the owner is in and possible Medicare premium surcharges. Those who inherit the IRA account will face the same sort of problems. Going for the fences is best done in Roth IRAs or in regular accounts.
Timothy from PA posted over 5 years ago:
On the subject of travel, how do you think this will effect MESA stock with the Virus get worse now?
You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account
