Does It Make Sense for BlackRock to Add Annuities to Retirement Plans?
by Charles Rotblut | May 09, 2024
In a sign of what could be the future for 401(k) plans and similar defined-contribution retirement plans, BlackRock has begun offering target-date funds with an annuity component. I explain the role annuities can play, what we know so far about the BlackRock LifePath funds and why they could make sense for some workers.
The best place to start is the role of annuities in a retirement portfolio. Economists like annuities because they shift longevity risk from the retiree to an insurance company. Longevity risk is the chance of outliving your savings. Insurance companies can pool longevity risk across a large number of people. We individual investors can’t.
Longevity risk is a key reason why one school of retirement planning thought believes retirees should have all nondiscretionary expenses covered by guaranteed sources of income. Annuities are one such source of this type of income. The two other primary sources are Social Security and pension benefits.
The majority of individual investors don’t like annuities. Annuity contracts transfer wealth from the owner (and their heirs) to the insurance company. They are costly to get out of. Plus, the industry has a bad reputation, largely due to variable and complex annuities. Many sales representatives—oops, I mean “advisers and agents”—pitch high-cost annuity contracts because the commissions are good. All too often they do not understand the very products they are pitching.
This is unfortunate because annuities can be good products when used properly. Plain-vanilla immediate and deferred annuities are designed to simply provide a stream of income as opposed to offering some type of potential growth. Their fees are generally inexpensive as far as annuities go.
Plain-vanilla annuities are appropriate for those who have moderate levels of wealth and are concerned about longevity risk. Such investors typically do not have pensions and/or are otherwise not receiving enough in guaranteed income to cover their living expenses.
If you have more money than you can expect to spend, annuities are not necessary. The same applies if you receive more than enough cash from sources of guaranteed income or have enough income generated from your portfolio that a return to low interest rates and/or a severe bear market won’t hurt you. At the other end, those who have only modest amounts saved probably won’t benefit from annuities either. There just isn’t enough wealth to buy a significant level of income.
Getting back to BlackRock, its LifePath funds act like a traditional target-date fund until the employee reaches age 55. Then BlackRock begins to allocate a portion of the portfolio to “lifetime income,” which is an annuity. Once a 401(k) participant turns 59½, they will have the option to buy annuity contracts from a select group of insurance companies. About 30% of the employee’s LifePath investment at age 65 will be invested in the annuity contract if that option is chosen. The remainder can be invested as the employee sees fit.
Currently, these target-date funds will only be available through certain defined-contribution plans like 401(k)s. Other fund families may introduce similar types of target-date products in the future.
I think annuities can play a role, but they are not right for every person. There are many participants in 401(k) plans who know nothing about withdrawal strategies and likely aren’t familiar with asset allocation strategies. For these individuals, BlackRock’s LifePath funds could make sense. For someone who understands withdrawal strategies and has knowledge about how to allocate, using other mutual funds offered in the 401(k) plan could be a better option.
-
The Truth About Annuities and Inflation
While there is no annuity strategy that perfectly solves for inflation, specific types of annuities can lessen its sting. -
What Is a Longevity Annuity?
Longevity annuities provide a guaranteed source of income starting at a future date. One type, QLACs, can be held in 401(k) plans. -
Getting to the Bottom Line: How to Read the Income Statement
The May AAII Journal continues our new series on financial statement analysis. This installment explains how the income statement not only reports a firm’s profitability but also offers valuable insights on internal operations. -
The Carrie Finances: Honey, I Shrunk the Budget
In her latest My Investing Discoveries blog post, Anine Sus reports some recent challenges with her budget and looks at how her no-buy strategy is faring for the year.
AAII Sentiment Survey
Pessimism among individual investors about the short-term outlook for stocks fell in the latest AAII Sentiment Survey. Meanwhile, optimism and neutral sentiment increased.
Bullish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will rise over the next six months, increased 2.3 percentage points to 40.8%. Bullish sentiment is above its historical average of 37.5% for the 26th time in 27 weeks.
Neutral sentiment, expectations that stock prices will stay essentially unchanged over the next six months, increased 6.4 percentage points to 35.4%. Neutral sentiment is above its historical average of 31.5% for the third time in eight weeks. Neutral sentiment was last higher on September 14, 2023 (36.4%).
Bearish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will fall over the next six months, decreased 8.7 percentage points to 23.8%. Pessimism is below its historical average of 31.0% for the first time in four weeks.
The bull-bear spread (bullish minus bearish sentiment) increased 11.0 percentage points to 17.0%. The bull-bear spread is above its historical average of 6.5% for the first time in four weeks.
This week’s special question asked AAII members what they think about the Federal Reserve’s decision to keep interest rates unchanged.
Here is how they responded:
- It was the right decision: 76.9%
- They should have raised rates: 10.4%
- They should have cut rates: 5.4%
- Not sure/no opinion: 7.3%
Bullish: 40.8%, up 2.3 points
Neutral: 35.4%, up 6.4 points
Bearish: 23.8%, down 8.7 points
Bullish: 37.5%
Neutral: 31.5%
Bearish: 31.0%
See more Sentiment Survey results.
May 2, 2024 Reasons for Not Selling Stocks This May
April 25, 2024 The Benefits and Costs of Diversification in My 403(b)
April 18, 2024 April Charts of Interest: The S&P 500's Streak Ends
April 11, 2024 Why Large-Cap Super Micro Computer Is Still in the Small-Cap Russell 2000 Index
Discussion
John L from NJ posted over 2 years ago:
Black Rock is adding annuities to retirement plans because annuities have higher profit margins than mutual funds or ETFs. Insurance company slick sales techniques and dishonesty have poisoned the well for annuities. It is telling that only insurance company lobbying groups are fighting the new DOL fiduciary rule.
Barry from TX posted over 2 years ago:
Like bank robbery, annuities have a bad rep for good reasons. Charles lists a few in paragraph 4. Annuities can help retirees who do not want to do for themselves/or who believe themselves to be not competent enough to manage their retirement wealth or who know they will overspend their accumulated wealth on a “bucket list” of entertainment experiences and they know they need an outside agency to provide some discipline over how to manage their accumulate assets. Other than these segments, I do not see the advantage of annuities. Every time someone proposes an annuity to me, I listen and get the offer in writing so I can do the math. In EVERY case from EVERY wealth management company, the math behind the deal is about the same. (1) You turn over ALL your assets to strangers who recharacterize them as “assets under management.” (2) They invest it and charge you fees for their services. (3) They give you a “stipend” of some amount they calculate. (4) They don’t guarantee anything. It is a “best efforts” and “at will” contract. That’s the straight-up business deal. Here’s the rub. Having someone else manage your money ALWAYS costs more than you are told or what you think it will be. The amount of money you get is always LESS THAN HALF of what you could have done for yourself if you just invested in a low-cost US Total Market ETF or a set of diversified ETFs. There are several very good ones to choose from and ALL of them will return more money to you over the same time period than ANY annuity does. Essentially, you get back about LESS THAN HALF the total revenue stream that is generated. They provider gets a LARGER SHARE of ALL the revenue your accumulated wealth provides. It’s not that they don’t “earn” their end. It’s just that the total fees amount to a very expensive fee to fill a self-discipline deficiency. In paragraph 2, Charles justifies annuities as a hedge against longevity risk – living longer than your money lasts. YOU can achieve the same outcomes through simple planning and frugality. How do justify giving away HALF of the revenue stream you need for your retirement to a total stranger? Answer, you don’t see it coming.
You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account
