September Added to an Already Volatile Year
by Charles Rotblut | October 06, 2022
Oh boy, September was volatile. The S&P 500 index experienced daily gains or losses of at least 1% during 13 out of the month’s 21 sessions. There were two days with daily moves greater than 2%—including the 4.3% drop on September 13.
As I discussed in my VMQ Stocks commentary, the S&P 500 experienced far more volatility last month than the average September volatility. CFRA Research’s Sam Stovall described the average September since World War II as having just 21% of its trading sessions experience “closing volatility of 1% or more.”
It wasn’t just September that was volatile; volatility has been elevated throughout 2022. I’ll share some data to put the numbers into context, but before I do, I want to discuss what to do about the high level of volatility.
Let’s start with what volatility is. Though often thought of in terms of downside moves, it really refers to the magnitude of change—both positive and negative—when commonly discussed in terms of stock market movement. People rarely complain when there is a high level of upside volatility. It’s the big downward moves that unnerve investors.
We’re all familiar with the reasons why this year has been volatile: inflation, tightening monetary policy, the war in Ukraine, ongoing supply chain issues, the so-called “smart money” being awfully reactive, etc. How the market’s swings affect a given individual investor depends on their need for portfolio withdrawals.
Downside volatility is a gift to investors saving for long-term goals. The lower prices allow each dollar saved to buy more shares. If you are in this camp, be greedy. Your future self will thank you.
If you are at the other end and are taking withdrawals, look at your allocation. If you have a safe assets bucket (e.g., an allocation to cash equivalents), take your withdrawals from it. If this isn’t an option, see if your portfolio income (dividends, distributions from funds, coupon payments from bonds, etc.) is enough to support your withdrawal needs. Both may allow you to sidestep having to sell stocks (and bonds) when they are down. If that’s not possible, rely on your sell rules to determine which positions should be sold or pared.
In between contributing and withdrawing is the age-old advice of staying the course. Yes, it may sound like a broken record, but the alternative is attempting to time the volatility. This year has been marked by sizable moves in both directions. Such an environment increases the behavioral risk of getting the timing decisions wrong. Crystal balls are not just cracked; they’re cloudy and rolling across dirty floors. Good luck trying to get a decent reading from one. (The Magic 8 Ball we have at the office might just be more accurate.)
Putting This Year’s Volatility Into Perspective
Through Wednesday’s close (October 5), there have been 96 days so far this year with a daily change of at least 1% in the S&P 500. This compares with the post-financial crisis full-calendar-year average of 55 days (measured between 2010 and 2021).
The blue-chip index has also experienced 36 days with a gain or loss of at least 2% in 2022. This is well above the post-financial crisis average of 14 days.
Whether the S&P 500 will match 2020’s level of volatility remains to be seen. Right now, 2022 is essentially tied with 2011’s tally of 96 days with a move of at least 1% and 35 days with a move of at least 2%.
Depending on what happens in the fourth quarter, it’s possible that 2022 could even reach 2020’s level of volatility. The coronavirus pandemic’s first year saw the S&P 500 experience 109 days with daily changes of at least 1% and 44 days with moves greater than 2%. These moves made it the most volatile year since 2009.
-
Optimizing Retirement Withdrawals Using the Level3 Strategy
The Level3 withdrawal approach allows you to stay invested in assets that offer the greatest potential for long-term wealth growth while satisfying current funding needs and minimizing real risk. -
Double Your Lifetime Purchasing Power in 20 Minutes
Taking advantage of your workplace retirement plan can make a big difference in your end balance and spending capacity. -
The Bear Market Has Reduced Valuations for Most Sectors
Stocks go on sale when bear markets occur. The drop in prices gives investors the opportunity to pick up many stocks at reduced valuations. -
How Much Risk Can You Handle and Still Meet Your Goals?
An investor’s overall tolerance can be determined both by the timing of their goals and financial and psychological factors. -
Why You Should Consider Volatility When Building a Portfolio
One observation from looking at six model portfolios is that focusing on the volatility of your portfolio gives you a more reliable measure of how it is actually behaving.
Members are looking for your input. Can you help with this question from the Mutual Funds & ETFs Community?
“The AAII Journal recently released an article discussing diversified emerging markets mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). It talks about the pros and cons of these types of securities, including that it’s considered an aggressive strategy. How many of you have used emerging markets mutual funds or ETFs to reduce portfolio volatility?”
Tap the button and then choose the Join the Community button on the right to answer this question in the AAII Community.
Answer This Question in the AAII Community »
AAII Sentiment Survey
The results from the latest AAII Sentiment Survey show optimism rebounding but continuing to stay unusually low. Pessimism fell after moving above 60% on consecutive weeks but continues to be unusually high.
Bullish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will rise over the next six months, increased 4.0 percentage points to 23.9%. Optimism is below its historical average of 38.0% for the 46th consecutive week. It is also unusually low for the sixth consecutive week and the 29th time in 40 weeks. The breakpoint between typical and unusually low readings is currently 27.6%.
Neutral sentiment, expectations that stock prices will stay essentially unchanged over the next six months, rebounded by 2.1 percentage points to 21.3%. Neutral sentiment is below its historical average of 31.5% for the 22nd time in 24 weeks. It is also at an unusually low level for the third consecutive week. The breakpoint between typical and unusually low readings is 23.1%.
Bearish sentiment, expectations that stock prices will fall over the next six months, fell 6.1 percentage points to 54.8%. Pessimism is above its historical average of 30.5% for the 45th time out of the past 46 weeks and is at an unusually high level for the 30th time out of the last 38 weeks. The breakpoint between typical and unusually high readings is currently 40.6%.
The bull-bear spread (bullish minus bearish sentiment) is –30.8% and is unusually low for the 31st time in 37 weeks. This week’s reading ranks among the most negative in the survey’s history. The breakpoint between typical and unusually low readings is currently –11.0%.
Historically, the S&P 500 index has gone on to realize above-average and above-median returns during the six- and 12-month periods following unusually low readings for bullish sentiment and the bull-bear spread. Unusually high bearish sentiment readings historically have also been followed by above-average and above-median six-month returns in the S&P 500. The S&P 500 has underperformed following periods of below-average neutral sentiment, though the link is weaker.
Continued volatility in the major stock indexes along with inflation, corporate earnings and increased chatter about the possibility of a recession are all likely weighing on individual investors’ short-term expectations for the stock market. Also influencing sentiment are monetary policy, politics and the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by Russia.
Bullish: 23.9%, up 4.0 points
Neutral: 21.3%, up 2.1 points
Bearish: 54.8%, down 6.1 points
Bullish: 38.0%
Neutral: 31.5%
Bearish: 30.5%
See more Sentiment Survey results.
AAII Asset Allocation Survey
Despite downside volatility and unusually low levels of optimism, the September AAII Asset Allocation Survey only shows a modest decrease in individual investors’ allocation to equities.
Stock and stock fund allocations declined by 1.1 percentage points to 63.4%. Though at a two-year low, equity exposure remains above the historical average of 61.5% for the 28th consecutive month. Allocations to stocks and stock funds were last lower in November 2020 (63.2%).
Bond and bond fund allocations increased by 0.3 percentage points to 14.7%. This is the fourth time in five months that fixed-income allocations have increased. Nonetheless, bond and bond fund allocations are below their historical average of 16.0% for the 19th consecutive month.
Cash allocations rebounded by 0.7 percentage points to 21.9%. September was the 29th consecutive month that cash allocations have been below their historical average of 22.5%.
There were three weeks during September with bullish sentiment readings ranking among the 50 lowest in our Sentiment Survey’s history. At the same time, bond yields continued to rise—albeit with some increased volatility near September’s end. Yet, AAII members largely stuck to their allocations. This is because they follow a long-term approach to investing, as we encourage them to do so.
- Stocks and Stock Funds: 63.4%, down 1.1 percentage points
- Bonds and Bond Funds: 14.7%, up 0.4 percentage points
- Cash: 21.9%, up 0.7 percentage points
- Stocks: 29.9%, down 0.5 percentage points
- Stocks Funds: 33.5%, down 0.6 percentage points
- Bonds: 3.4%, up 0.4 percentage points
- Bond Funds: 11.4%, up 0.0 percentage points
- Stocks/Stock Funds: 61.5%
- Bonds/Bond Funds: 16.0%
- Cash: 22.5%
Take the Asset Allocation Survey.
September 29, 2022 The Upsides of High Inflation
September 22, 2022 Another Rate Hike as Concerns About a Recession Increase
September 15, 2022 Profit Margins Have Gained in Importance
September 8, 2022 401(k) Tips and Useful Information
Discussion
Barry J from TX posted over 3 years ago:
Charles, great and timely guidance in paragraphs 6-8. But you share a problem with POTUS, nobody is acting on your leadership. Data in the AAII Asset Allocation Survey referenced in this article indicates that only 1.1% of AAII members are responding to the data from over the last 9 months you reviewed. Do you have any past data on how long it takes AAII members to react to significant market changes, especially from the analogous years 1999 and 2007? Of course, the other possible scenario is that AAII members are so good at heeding AAII advice that they have already implemented your suggestions. NO worries. You are a shoo in for the 2022 AAII Paul Revere Award, an award I invented from a story that Cajun chef/comedian Justin Wilson told about a small Louisiana bayou town that needed money and decided to raffle off a horse to raise the money. It was a 1960’s version of “GoFundMe.” The only problem was that the only horse in the town was dead. When asked if anyone would get angry about winning a dead horse under his plan, the mayor replied, “Only the winner.” Keep leading. The 98.9% will catch up someday soon when the 2023-2024 recession shrinks all non-fixed income portfolios like they did in the example periods you referenced. In the meantime, ask the staff to shop for a dead horse in case we need a prize for AAII member who loses the most in their all equity portfolio. As the Cajuns say, "Lache Pas la Patate." Bonsoir, mon ami.
Kevin from NC posted over 3 years ago:
Very nice, Barry. Personally, I'm holding out for the lagniappe potential of future stock increases by converting more traditional IRA money to Roth accounts. If I knew where the bottom would hit I would wait, but now seems just fine. The fact that stock holdings only dropped 1.1% reflects that most AAII members stick with an allocation. Reducing the stock holdings in a downturn just locks in losses. I don't think America is over or a dead horse, yet, so I remain bullish on the future growth of our economy. Someday. The cash allocation can meet my needs until someday comes - as long as it is in the next 4 years or so.
Barry J from TX posted over 3 years ago:
Good plan, Kevin. Since I wrote this earlier today, I read Jason Zweig's "Intelligent Investor" column in today's WSJ. His thoughts support Charles observations. It is titled "How to Make Peace With Your Stock Market Losses." https://www.wsj.com/articles/selling-stock-in-down-market-11665153733?mod=djintinvestor_t Jason has a long series of articles with this theme. That tells me market turmoil is nothing new. It is a good time to have sources line Charles @ AAII and Jason @ WSJ to provide the perspective of their vast experience.
You need to log in as a registered AAII user before commenting.
Create an account
